here's what i think:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qm-WinwI9HE
yeah.
plus, it just goes to show that you are naive enough to agree with this guy, who obviously wants to evade tax. sounds desperate to me.
and then you're gonna go... "oh, youre such a stupid sheep... baaah baaaah baaah."
Thread
Posts in chronological order
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color=666600>Music Man wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I think this is a joke thread.[/QUOTE]
the only joke here is you
the only joke here is you
^ You make so many good signature quotes I can't work out which one to use. It's genius.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color=009966>?Freya? wrote: [/QUOTENAME]^ You make so many good signature quotes I can't work out which one to use. It's genius.[/QUOTE]
you dont have the mind to understand the brilliance of treasure moment, you are a stupid sheep!
you dont have the mind to understand the brilliance of treasure moment, you are a stupid sheep!
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Atheist wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=FF0033 face=symbol>Freddie wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Atheist wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=FF0033 face=symbol>Freddie wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Are you ever going to shut up? Use your brain, not what you see on the internet.[/QUOTE]
use my brain? not what i see on the internet? you mean i should trust the biased media on tv instead? the mainstream media that is owned by the same people who want to control us?[/QUOTE]
No, acquire your own opinion and stop relying on what you're being told on the internet. [/QUOTE]
what has internet to do with anything? you can find everything on the internet in opposite on the biased view of the world you see on tv.
I dont care if its on the internet, thats not the issue, the important thing is if it makes sense which it does if you open your eyes a little and listen a little instead of being a brainwashed sheep like you seem to be[/QUOTE]
I'm going to be reasonable with you one last time. And I mean ONE *LAST* TIME.
I can present you with a solid case, full of perfectly fitting arguments to prove to you that George Bush is a Martian, that he is not, that Canada is secretly controlling the US government, or the other way around. Simply put, I can prove *anything* to you with solid arguments.
However, what that would call for, is twisting the evidence. Using untrue facts. Incorrect quotes, citations or slanted material. To quote Richelieu: "give me one page written by the most honest man in France, and I will find you something in there to hang him for."
These 'documentaries' you keep giving us are based on faulty information, incorrect deductions and often, lies. But you don't have to take my word for it! That's the best part! You don't HAVE to believe me. Just take any of these documentaries you wish, and grab a notebook. Whenever they present you evidence, write down EXACTLY what they present you with. Then, after you finish, look up the sources they gave you. Check them. Compare them. You will find that even if the sources they quote EXIST (which is often not the case), they will have jerked parts of it out of context.
I'll give you an example:
In NSC-68, a US government document for national security dating to April 1950, the US outlines policy regarding the Kremlin. In that document, we find the following:
"For us the role of military power is to [...] attack [...], to use military force aggressively if that course is expedient in the achievement of its design."
The US frankly admits to wanting to dominate the planet with its army? No.
This is the complete quote: "For us the role of military power is to serve the national purpose by deterring an attack upon us while we seek, by other means, to create an environment in which our free society can flourish, and by fighting, if necessary, to defend the integrity and vitality of our free society and to defeat any aggressor. The Kremlin uses Soviet military power to back up and serve the Kremlin design. It does not hesitate to use military force aggressively if that course is expedient in the achievement of its design. The differences between our fundamental purpose and the Kremlin design, therefore, are reflected in our respective attitudes towards, and use of, military force."
Quite a difference, huh?
You keep yelling about biased media. The ones creating your so-called documentaries are biased too, just in the other direction.
use my brain? not what i see on the internet? you mean i should trust the biased media on tv instead? the mainstream media that is owned by the same people who want to control us?[/QUOTE]
No, acquire your own opinion and stop relying on what you're being told on the internet. [/QUOTE]
what has internet to do with anything? you can find everything on the internet in opposite on the biased view of the world you see on tv.
I dont care if its on the internet, thats not the issue, the important thing is if it makes sense which it does if you open your eyes a little and listen a little instead of being a brainwashed sheep like you seem to be[/QUOTE]
I'm going to be reasonable with you one last time. And I mean ONE *LAST* TIME.
I can present you with a solid case, full of perfectly fitting arguments to prove to you that George Bush is a Martian, that he is not, that Canada is secretly controlling the US government, or the other way around. Simply put, I can prove *anything* to you with solid arguments.
However, what that would call for, is twisting the evidence. Using untrue facts. Incorrect quotes, citations or slanted material. To quote Richelieu: "give me one page written by the most honest man in France, and I will find you something in there to hang him for."
These 'documentaries' you keep giving us are based on faulty information, incorrect deductions and often, lies. But you don't have to take my word for it! That's the best part! You don't HAVE to believe me. Just take any of these documentaries you wish, and grab a notebook. Whenever they present you evidence, write down EXACTLY what they present you with. Then, after you finish, look up the sources they gave you. Check them. Compare them. You will find that even if the sources they quote EXIST (which is often not the case), they will have jerked parts of it out of context.
I'll give you an example:
In NSC-68, a US government document for national security dating to April 1950, the US outlines policy regarding the Kremlin. In that document, we find the following:
"For us the role of military power is to [...] attack [...], to use military force aggressively if that course is expedient in the achievement of its design."
The US frankly admits to wanting to dominate the planet with its army? No.
This is the complete quote: "For us the role of military power is to serve the national purpose by deterring an attack upon us while we seek, by other means, to create an environment in which our free society can flourish, and by fighting, if necessary, to defend the integrity and vitality of our free society and to defeat any aggressor. The Kremlin uses Soviet military power to back up and serve the Kremlin design. It does not hesitate to use military force aggressively if that course is expedient in the achievement of its design. The differences between our fundamental purpose and the Kremlin design, therefore, are reflected in our respective attitudes towards, and use of, military force."
Quite a difference, huh?
You keep yelling about biased media. The ones creating your so-called documentaries are biased too, just in the other direction.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Atheist wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color=009966>?Freya? wrote: [/QUOTENAME]^ You make so many good signature quotes I can't work out which one to use. It's genius.[/QUOTE]
you dont have the mind to understand the brilliance of treasure moment, you are a stupid sheep![/QUOTE]
Yes, that's indeed a good one, thanks!
you dont have the mind to understand the brilliance of treasure moment, you are a stupid sheep![/QUOTE]
Yes, that's indeed a good one, thanks!
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Atheist wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color=009966>?Freya? wrote: [/QUOTENAME]^ You make so many good signature quotes I can't work out which one to use. It's genius.[/QUOTE]
you dont have the mind to understand the brilliance of treasure moment, you are a stupid sheep![/QUOTE]
baaa, baaa, black sheep, have you any wool?
yes sir, yes sir, three bags full.
one for my master, one for the maid, one for the little boy who lives down the lane...
baaa, baaa, black sheep, have you any wool?
yes sir, yes sir, three bags full.
you dont have the mind to understand the brilliance of treasure moment, you are a stupid sheep![/QUOTE]
baaa, baaa, black sheep, have you any wool?
yes sir, yes sir, three bags full.
one for my master, one for the maid, one for the little boy who lives down the lane...
baaa, baaa, black sheep, have you any wool?
yes sir, yes sir, three bags full.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Atheist wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=FF0033 face=symbol>Freddie wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Atheist wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=FF0033 face=symbol>Freddie wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Are you ever going to shut up? Use your brain, not what you see on the internet.[/QUOTE]
use my brain? not what i see on the internet? you mean i should trust the biased media on tv instead? the mainstream media that is owned by the same people who want to control us?[/QUOTE]
No, acquire your own opinion and stop relying on what you're being told on the internet. [/QUOTE]
what has internet to do with anything? you can find everything on the internet in opposite on the biased view of the world you see on tv.
I dont care if its on the internet, thats not the issue, the important thing is if it makes sense which it does if you open your eyes a little and listen a little instead of being a brainwashed sheep like you seem to be[/QUOTE]
I'm going to be reasonable with you one last time. And I mean ONE *LAST* TIME.
I can present you with a solid case, full of perfectly fitting arguments to prove to you that George Bush is a Martian, that he is not, that Canada is secretly controlling the US government, or the other way around. Simply put, I can prove *anything* to you with solid arguments.
However, what that would call for, is twisting the evidence. Using untrue facts. Incorrect quotes, citations or slanted material. To quote Richelieu: "give me one page written by the most honest man in France, and I will find you something in there to hang him for."
These 'documentaries' you keep giving us are based on faulty information, incorrect deductions and often, lies. But you don't have to take my word for it! That's the best part! You don't HAVE to believe me. Just take any of these documentaries you wish, and grab a notebook. Whenever they present you evidence, write down EXACTLY what they present you with. Then, after you finish, look up the sources they gave you. Check them. Compare them. You will find that even if the sources they quote EXIST (which is often not the case), they will have jerked parts of it out of context.
I'll give you an example:
In NSC-68, a US government document for national security dating to April 1950, the US outlines policy regarding the Kremlin. In that document, we find the following:
"For us the role of military power is to [...] attack [...], to use military force aggressively if that course is expedient in the achievement of its design."
The US frankly admits to wanting to dominate the planet with its army? No.
This is the complete quote: "For us the role of military power is to serve the national purpose by deterring an attack upon us while we seek, by other means, to create an environment in which our free society can flourish, and by fighting, if necessary, to defend the integrity and vitality of our free society and to defeat any aggressor. The Kremlin uses Soviet military power to back up and serve the Kremlin design. It does not hesitate to use military force aggressively if that course is expedient in the achievement of its design. The differences between our fundamental purpose and the Kremlin design, therefore, are reflected in our respective attitudes towards, and use of, military force."
Quite a difference, huh?
You keep yelling about biased media. The ones creating your so-called documentaries are biased too, just in the other direction.[/QUOTE]
TQ, youre wasting your time with this idiot, he probably didnt even read the first sentence. hes just gonna call you stupid because he himself is not intelligent enough to come up with a better name calling list to compensate for his lack of knowledge. :p
i cant remember who said it but its turning into a joke thre
use my brain? not what i see on the internet? you mean i should trust the biased media on tv instead? the mainstream media that is owned by the same people who want to control us?[/QUOTE]
No, acquire your own opinion and stop relying on what you're being told on the internet. [/QUOTE]
what has internet to do with anything? you can find everything on the internet in opposite on the biased view of the world you see on tv.
I dont care if its on the internet, thats not the issue, the important thing is if it makes sense which it does if you open your eyes a little and listen a little instead of being a brainwashed sheep like you seem to be[/QUOTE]
I'm going to be reasonable with you one last time. And I mean ONE *LAST* TIME.
I can present you with a solid case, full of perfectly fitting arguments to prove to you that George Bush is a Martian, that he is not, that Canada is secretly controlling the US government, or the other way around. Simply put, I can prove *anything* to you with solid arguments.
However, what that would call for, is twisting the evidence. Using untrue facts. Incorrect quotes, citations or slanted material. To quote Richelieu: "give me one page written by the most honest man in France, and I will find you something in there to hang him for."
These 'documentaries' you keep giving us are based on faulty information, incorrect deductions and often, lies. But you don't have to take my word for it! That's the best part! You don't HAVE to believe me. Just take any of these documentaries you wish, and grab a notebook. Whenever they present you evidence, write down EXACTLY what they present you with. Then, after you finish, look up the sources they gave you. Check them. Compare them. You will find that even if the sources they quote EXIST (which is often not the case), they will have jerked parts of it out of context.
I'll give you an example:
In NSC-68, a US government document for national security dating to April 1950, the US outlines policy regarding the Kremlin. In that document, we find the following:
"For us the role of military power is to [...] attack [...], to use military force aggressively if that course is expedient in the achievement of its design."
The US frankly admits to wanting to dominate the planet with its army? No.
This is the complete quote: "For us the role of military power is to serve the national purpose by deterring an attack upon us while we seek, by other means, to create an environment in which our free society can flourish, and by fighting, if necessary, to defend the integrity and vitality of our free society and to defeat any aggressor. The Kremlin uses Soviet military power to back up and serve the Kremlin design. It does not hesitate to use military force aggressively if that course is expedient in the achievement of its design. The differences between our fundamental purpose and the Kremlin design, therefore, are reflected in our respective attitudes towards, and use of, military force."
Quite a difference, huh?
You keep yelling about biased media. The ones creating your so-called documentaries are biased too, just in the other direction.[/QUOTE]
TQ, youre wasting your time with this idiot, he probably didnt even read the first sentence. hes just gonna call you stupid because he himself is not intelligent enough to come up with a better name calling list to compensate for his lack of knowledge. :p
i cant remember who said it but its turning into a joke thre
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Sparrow wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Atheist wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=FF0033 face=symbol>Freddie wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Atheist wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=FF0033 face=symbol>Freddie wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Are you ever going to shut up? Use your brain, not what you see on the internet.[/QUOTE]
use my brain? not what i see on the internet? you mean i should trust the biased media on tv instead? the mainstream media that is owned by the same people who want to control us?[/QUOTE]
No, acquire your own opinion and stop relying on what you're being told on the internet. [/QUOTE]
what has internet to do with anything? you can find everything on the internet in opposite on the biased view of the world you see on tv.
I dont care if its on the internet, thats not the issue, the important thing is if it makes sense which it does if you open your eyes a little and listen a little instead of being a brainwashed sheep like you seem to be[/QUOTE]
I'm going to be reasonable with you one last time. And I mean ONE *LAST* TIME.
I can present you with a solid case, full of perfectly fitting arguments to prove to you that George Bush is a Martian, that he is not, that Canada is secretly controlling the US government, or the other way around. Simply put, I can prove *anything* to you with solid arguments.
However, what that would call for, is twisting the evidence. Using untrue facts. Incorrect quotes, citations or slanted material. To quote Richelieu: "give me one page written by the most honest man in France, and I will find you something in there to hang him for."
These 'documentaries' you keep giving us are based on faulty information, incorrect deductions and often, lies. But you don't have to take my word for it! That's the best part! You don't HAVE to believe me. Just take any of these documentaries you wish, and grab a notebook. Whenever they present you evidence, write down EXACTLY what they present you with. Then, after you finish, look up the sources they gave you. Check them. Compare them. You will find that even if the sources they quote EXIST (which is often not the case), they will have jerked parts of it out of context.
I'll give you an example:
In NSC-68, a US government document for national security dating to April 1950, the US outlines policy regarding the Kremlin. In that document, we find the following:
"For us the role of military power is to [...] attack [...], to use military force aggressively if that course is expedient in the achievement of its design."
The US frankly admits to wanting to dominate the planet with its army? No.
This is the complete quote: "For us the role of military power is to serve the national purpose by deterring an attack upon us while we seek, by other means, to create an environment in which our free society can flourish, and by fighting, if necessary, to defend the integrity and vitality of our free society and to defeat any aggressor. The Kremlin uses Soviet military power to back up and serve the Kremlin design. It does not hesitate to use military force aggressively if that course is expedient in the achievement of its design. The differences between our fundamental purpose and the Kremlin design, therefore, are reflected in our respective attitudes towards, and use of, military force."
Quite a difference, huh?
You keep yelling about biased media. The ones creating your so-called documentaries are biased too, just in the other direction.[/QUOTE]
TQ, youre wasting your time with this idiot, he probably didnt even read the first sentence. hes just gonna call you stupid because he himself is not intelligent enough to come up with a better name calling list to compensate for his lack of knowledge. :p
i cant remember
use my brain? not what i see on the internet? you mean i should trust the biased media on tv instead? the mainstream media that is owned by the same people who want to control us?[/QUOTE]
No, acquire your own opinion and stop relying on what you're being told on the internet. [/QUOTE]
what has internet to do with anything? you can find everything on the internet in opposite on the biased view of the world you see on tv.
I dont care if its on the internet, thats not the issue, the important thing is if it makes sense which it does if you open your eyes a little and listen a little instead of being a brainwashed sheep like you seem to be[/QUOTE]
I'm going to be reasonable with you one last time. And I mean ONE *LAST* TIME.
I can present you with a solid case, full of perfectly fitting arguments to prove to you that George Bush is a Martian, that he is not, that Canada is secretly controlling the US government, or the other way around. Simply put, I can prove *anything* to you with solid arguments.
However, what that would call for, is twisting the evidence. Using untrue facts. Incorrect quotes, citations or slanted material. To quote Richelieu: "give me one page written by the most honest man in France, and I will find you something in there to hang him for."
These 'documentaries' you keep giving us are based on faulty information, incorrect deductions and often, lies. But you don't have to take my word for it! That's the best part! You don't HAVE to believe me. Just take any of these documentaries you wish, and grab a notebook. Whenever they present you evidence, write down EXACTLY what they present you with. Then, after you finish, look up the sources they gave you. Check them. Compare them. You will find that even if the sources they quote EXIST (which is often not the case), they will have jerked parts of it out of context.
I'll give you an example:
In NSC-68, a US government document for national security dating to April 1950, the US outlines policy regarding the Kremlin. In that document, we find the following:
"For us the role of military power is to [...] attack [...], to use military force aggressively if that course is expedient in the achievement of its design."
The US frankly admits to wanting to dominate the planet with its army? No.
This is the complete quote: "For us the role of military power is to serve the national purpose by deterring an attack upon us while we seek, by other means, to create an environment in which our free society can flourish, and by fighting, if necessary, to defend the integrity and vitality of our free society and to defeat any aggressor. The Kremlin uses Soviet military power to back up and serve the Kremlin design. It does not hesitate to use military force aggressively if that course is expedient in the achievement of its design. The differences between our fundamental purpose and the Kremlin design, therefore, are reflected in our respective attitudes towards, and use of, military force."
Quite a difference, huh?
You keep yelling about biased media. The ones creating your so-called documentaries are biased too, just in the other direction.[/QUOTE]
TQ, youre wasting your time with this idiot, he probably didnt even read the first sentence. hes just gonna call you stupid because he himself is not intelligent enough to come up with a better name calling list to compensate for his lack of knowledge. :p
i cant remember
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color=009966>?Freya? wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Treasure Moment are shit.[/QUOTE]xDDDDDDDDD
If I weren't a merciless gay sex machine, I'd marry you
If I weren't a merciless gay sex machine, I'd marry you
Merciless gay sex...heh, that makes me laugh.
You know...I'm still laughing my ass off about this thread.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Valensian Sky Surveillance wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color=009966>?Freya? wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Treasure Moment are shit.[/QUOTE]xDDDDDDDDD
If I weren't a merciless gay sex machine, I'd marry you[/QUOTE]
Good title for an album! "Merciless gay sex machine".
If I weren't a merciless gay sex machine, I'd marry you[/QUOTE]
Good title for an album! "Merciless gay sex machine".
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Atheist wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Sparrow wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Atheist wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=FF0033 face=symbol>Freddie wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Atheist wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=FF0033 face=symbol>Freddie wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Are you ever going to shut up? Use your brain, not what you see on the internet.[/QUOTE]
use my brain? not what i see on the internet? you mean i should trust the biased media on tv instead? the mainstream media that is owned by the same people who want to control us?[/QUOTE]
No, acquire your own opinion and stop relying on what you're being told on the internet. [/QUOTE]
what has internet to do with anything? you can find everything on the internet in opposite on the biased view of the world you see on tv.
I dont care if its on the internet, thats not the issue, the important thing is if it makes sense which it does if you open your eyes a little and listen a little instead of being a brainwashed sheep like you seem to be[/QUOTE]
I'm going to be reasonable with you one last time. And I mean ONE *LAST* TIME.
I can present you with a solid case, full of perfectly fitting arguments to prove to you that George Bush is a Martian, that he is not, that Canada is secretly controlling the US government, or the other way around. Simply put, I can prove *anything* to you with solid arguments.
However, what that would call for, is twisting the evidence. Using untrue facts. Incorrect quotes, citations or slanted material. To quote Richelieu: "give me one page written by the most honest man in France, and I will find you something in there to hang him for."
These 'documentaries' you keep giving us are based on faulty information, incorrect deductions and often, lies. But you don't have to take my word for it! That's the best part! You don't HAVE to believe me. Just take any of these documentaries you wish, and grab a notebook. Whenever they present you evidence, write down EXACTLY what they present you with. Then, after you finish, look up the sources they gave you. Check them. Compare them. You will find that even if the sources they quote EXIST (which is often not the case), they will have jerked parts of it out of context.
I'll give you an example:
In NSC-68, a US government document for national security dating to April 1950, the US outlines policy regarding the Kremlin. In that document, we find the following:
"For us the role of military power is to [...] attack [...], to use military force aggressively if that course is expedient in the achievement of its design."
The US frankly admits to wanting to dominate the planet with its army? No.
This is the complete quote: "For us the role of military power is to serve the national purpose by deterring an attack upon us while we seek, by other means, to create an environment in which our free society can flourish, and by fighting, if necessary, to defend the integrity and vitality of our free society and to defeat any aggressor. The Kremlin uses Soviet military power to back up and serve the Kremlin design. It does not hesitate to use military force aggressively if that course is expedient in the achievement of its design. The differences between our fundamental purpose and the Kremlin design, therefore, are reflected in our respective attitudes towards, and use of, military force."
Quite a difference, huh?
You keep yelling about biased media. The ones creating your so-called documentaries are biased too, just in the other direction.[/QUOTE]
TQ, youre wasting your time with this idiot, he probably didnt even read the first sentence. hes just gonna call you stupid because he himself is not intelligent enough to come up with a better name calling list to compensate for his
use my brain? not what i see on the internet? you mean i should trust the biased media on tv instead? the mainstream media that is owned by the same people who want to control us?[/QUOTE]
No, acquire your own opinion and stop relying on what you're being told on the internet. [/QUOTE]
what has internet to do with anything? you can find everything on the internet in opposite on the biased view of the world you see on tv.
I dont care if its on the internet, thats not the issue, the important thing is if it makes sense which it does if you open your eyes a little and listen a little instead of being a brainwashed sheep like you seem to be[/QUOTE]
I'm going to be reasonable with you one last time. And I mean ONE *LAST* TIME.
I can present you with a solid case, full of perfectly fitting arguments to prove to you that George Bush is a Martian, that he is not, that Canada is secretly controlling the US government, or the other way around. Simply put, I can prove *anything* to you with solid arguments.
However, what that would call for, is twisting the evidence. Using untrue facts. Incorrect quotes, citations or slanted material. To quote Richelieu: "give me one page written by the most honest man in France, and I will find you something in there to hang him for."
These 'documentaries' you keep giving us are based on faulty information, incorrect deductions and often, lies. But you don't have to take my word for it! That's the best part! You don't HAVE to believe me. Just take any of these documentaries you wish, and grab a notebook. Whenever they present you evidence, write down EXACTLY what they present you with. Then, after you finish, look up the sources they gave you. Check them. Compare them. You will find that even if the sources they quote EXIST (which is often not the case), they will have jerked parts of it out of context.
I'll give you an example:
In NSC-68, a US government document for national security dating to April 1950, the US outlines policy regarding the Kremlin. In that document, we find the following:
"For us the role of military power is to [...] attack [...], to use military force aggressively if that course is expedient in the achievement of its design."
The US frankly admits to wanting to dominate the planet with its army? No.
This is the complete quote: "For us the role of military power is to serve the national purpose by deterring an attack upon us while we seek, by other means, to create an environment in which our free society can flourish, and by fighting, if necessary, to defend the integrity and vitality of our free society and to defeat any aggressor. The Kremlin uses Soviet military power to back up and serve the Kremlin design. It does not hesitate to use military force aggressively if that course is expedient in the achievement of its design. The differences between our fundamental purpose and the Kremlin design, therefore, are reflected in our respective attitudes towards, and use of, military force."
Quite a difference, huh?
You keep yelling about biased media. The ones creating your so-called documentaries are biased too, just in the other direction.[/QUOTE]
TQ, youre wasting your time with this idiot, he probably didnt even read the first sentence. hes just gonna call you stupid because he himself is not intelligent enough to come up with a better name calling list to compensate for his