Wembley fan86.. you are dead right!
dont pay attention to ignorant fools like some of the people here, they know NOTHING about music
Thread
Posts in chronological order
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Atheist wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Wembley fan86.. you are dead right!
dont pay attention to ignorat fools like some of the people here, they know NOTHING about music[/QUOTE]
OH, right, mozart man.
dont pay attention to ignorat fools like some of the people here, they know NOTHING about music[/QUOTE]
OH, right, mozart man.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=6600f>Vishnu.<h6>A Scientist wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Atheist wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Wembley fan86.. you are dead right!
dont pay attention to ignorat fools like some of the people here, they know NOTHING about music[/QUOTE]
OH, right, mozart man.[/QUOTE]
im not saying mozart is bad coz he isnt and he has a couple of tunes that are great BUT he is NOTHING compared to the almighty Freddie Mercury and that is a FACT
dont pay attention to ignorat fools like some of the people here, they know NOTHING about music[/QUOTE]
OH, right, mozart man.[/QUOTE]
im not saying mozart is bad coz he isnt and he has a couple of tunes that are great BUT he is NOTHING compared to the almighty Freddie Mercury and that is a FACT
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Wembley fan86 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=6600f>Vishnu.<h6>A Scientist wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I don't think the two can be compared. The Beatles' style of music was very different from Queen's. They were both great in their own ways.
And it's just plain ignorant to say that the Beatles' music is "baby music". I mean, they're considered the greatest band ever. [/QUOTE]
I never said they weren't. But seriosuly, a lot of their songs don't have a point. Just for easy listening. Back in their time, they were considered a miracle. But now, as everyone looks back at all the great music acts after them, The Beatles are just pioneers. Their music is not that stellar. [/QUOTE]
Naw I'd have to disagree, because every generation of new teenagers still get into the Beatles...they did have musical qualites unlike other bands after them. Otherwise they'd just be part of a music history course, rather then something young people still listen to on a regular basis (which they do). There's more to it than people simply respecting the Beatles' pioneering impact; people actually still like the songs. Many Queen songs don't have a point either but we still listen to Queen.
And it's just plain ignorant to say that the Beatles' music is "baby music". I mean, they're considered the greatest band ever. [/QUOTE]
I never said they weren't. But seriosuly, a lot of their songs don't have a point. Just for easy listening. Back in their time, they were considered a miracle. But now, as everyone looks back at all the great music acts after them, The Beatles are just pioneers. Their music is not that stellar. [/QUOTE]
Naw I'd have to disagree, because every generation of new teenagers still get into the Beatles...they did have musical qualites unlike other bands after them. Otherwise they'd just be part of a music history course, rather then something young people still listen to on a regular basis (which they do). There's more to it than people simply respecting the Beatles' pioneering impact; people actually still like the songs. Many Queen songs don't have a point either but we still listen to Queen.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Atheist wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=6600f>Vishnu.<h6>A Scientist wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Atheist wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Wembley fan86.. you are dead right!
dont pay attention to ignorat fools like some of the people here, they know NOTHING about music[/QUOTE]
OH, right, mozart man.[/QUOTE]
im not saying mozart is bad coz he isnt and he has a couple of tunes that are great BUT he is NOTHING compared to the almighty Freddie Mercury and that is a FACT[/QUOTE]
Why the hell are you people comparing MOZART and FREDDIE MERCURY!? Is it even possible?
dont pay attention to ignorat fools like some of the people here, they know NOTHING about music[/QUOTE]
OH, right, mozart man.[/QUOTE]
im not saying mozart is bad coz he isnt and he has a couple of tunes that are great BUT he is NOTHING compared to the almighty Freddie Mercury and that is a FACT[/QUOTE]
Why the hell are you people comparing MOZART and FREDDIE MERCURY!? Is it even possible?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Atheist wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
im not saying mozart is bad coz he isnt and he has a couple of tunes that are great BUT he is NOTHING compared to the almighty Freddie Mercury and that is a FACT[/QUOTE]
Mozart is a fucking prodigy. He started to learn his first compositions at the age of four and had already begun to compose at the mere age of five.
Read a book and absorb some information before opening your mouth.
im not saying mozart is bad coz he isnt and he has a couple of tunes that are great BUT he is NOTHING compared to the almighty Freddie Mercury and that is a FACT[/QUOTE]
Mozart is a fucking prodigy. He started to learn his first compositions at the age of four and had already begun to compose at the mere age of five.
Read a book and absorb some information before opening your mouth.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Wembley fan86 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=6600f>Vishnu.<h6>A Scientist wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I don't think the two can be compared. The Beatles' style of music was very different from Queen's. They were both great in their own ways.
And it's just plain ignorant to say that the Beatles' music is "baby music". I mean, they're considered the greatest band ever. [/QUOTE]
I never said they weren't. But seriosuly, a lot of their songs don't have a point. Just for easy listening. Back in their time, they were considered a miracle. But now, as everyone looks back at all the great music acts after them, The Beatles are just pioneers. Their music is not that stellar. [/QUOTE]
What is wrong with songs that don't have a "point"?! Since Mozart was mentioned, does any of his music have a "point"? Other than, music for the sake of beautiful music? (I hate Mozart, but that's irrelevant). You speak like a damn Philistine.
And it's just plain ignorant to say that the Beatles' music is "baby music". I mean, they're considered the greatest band ever. [/QUOTE]
I never said they weren't. But seriosuly, a lot of their songs don't have a point. Just for easy listening. Back in their time, they were considered a miracle. But now, as everyone looks back at all the great music acts after them, The Beatles are just pioneers. Their music is not that stellar. [/QUOTE]
What is wrong with songs that don't have a "point"?! Since Mozart was mentioned, does any of his music have a "point"? Other than, music for the sake of beautiful music? (I hate Mozart, but that's irrelevant). You speak like a damn Philistine.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Atheist wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=6600f>Vishnu.<h6>A Scientist wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I don't think the two can be compared. The Beatles' style of music was very different from Queen's. They were both great in their own ways.
And it's just plain ignorant to say that the Beatles' music is "baby music". I mean, they're considered the greatest band ever. [/QUOTE]
considered by retards yeah but in truth they are just another mediocre band, there are millions of them [/QUOTE]
I am not a retard, and having heard most of the Beatles 200 odd songs, I can tell you they're not mediocre.
They just seem bland in comparison to the real heavyweights of music... (Treasure Moment). But I'm telling you - as you obviously haven't done any research... they aren't mediocre.
And it's just plain ignorant to say that the Beatles' music is "baby music". I mean, they're considered the greatest band ever. [/QUOTE]
considered by retards yeah but in truth they are just another mediocre band, there are millions of them [/QUOTE]
I am not a retard, and having heard most of the Beatles 200 odd songs, I can tell you they're not mediocre.
They just seem bland in comparison to the real heavyweights of music... (Treasure Moment). But I'm telling you - as you obviously haven't done any research... they aren't mediocre.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Wembley fan86 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Atheist wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=6600f>Vishnu.<h6>A Scientist wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Atheist wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Wembley fan86.. you are dead right!
dont pay attention to ignorat fools like some of the people here, they know NOTHING about music[/QUOTE]
OH, right, mozart man.[/QUOTE]
im not saying mozart is bad coz he isnt and he has a couple of tunes that are great BUT he is NOTHING compared to the almighty Freddie Mercury and that is a FACT[/QUOTE]
Why the hell are you people comparing MOZART and FREDDIE MERCURY!? Is it even possible?[/QUOTE]
its very possible and freddie is actually alot better musician and of course singer, also more important than mozart
dont pay attention to ignorat fools like some of the people here, they know NOTHING about music[/QUOTE]
OH, right, mozart man.[/QUOTE]
im not saying mozart is bad coz he isnt and he has a couple of tunes that are great BUT he is NOTHING compared to the almighty Freddie Mercury and that is a FACT[/QUOTE]
Why the hell are you people comparing MOZART and FREDDIE MERCURY!? Is it even possible?[/QUOTE]
its very possible and freddie is actually alot better musician and of course singer, also more important than mozart
Who the hell is "Treasure Moment" !? Zebonka, I presume that's sarcasm, though I don't who you were referring to...
>> "its very possible and freddie is actually alot better musician and of course singer, also more important than mozart"
That underlines the fact that either Atheist is remarkably stupid, or that he/she simply enjoys provoking some people. My guess is the latter, for I find it difficult to believe that people can actually be that stupid!
>> "its very possible and freddie is actually alot better musician and of course singer, also more important than mozart"
That underlines the fact that either Atheist is remarkably stupid, or that he/she simply enjoys provoking some people. My guess is the latter, for I find it difficult to believe that people can actually be that stupid!
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]~-:Moet et Chandon:-~ wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Who the hell is "Treasure Moment" !? Zebonka, I presume that's sarcasm, though I don't who you were referring to...
>> "its very possible and freddie is actually alot better musician and of course singer, also more important than mozart"
That underlines the fact that either Atheist is remarkably stupid, or that he/she simply enjoys provoking some people. My guess is the latter, for I find it difficult to believe that people can actually be that stupid![/QUOTE]
tell me whats so stupid about this? who do you think mozart is? god? he was a human and overrated as hell
Freddie is alot better musician, wrote many more catchy and good songs than him, i dont care if mozart had more skills. Freddie is also the best singer of all time and cant be beaten
conclusion.. Freddie=God of all music
>> "its very possible and freddie is actually alot better musician and of course singer, also more important than mozart"
That underlines the fact that either Atheist is remarkably stupid, or that he/she simply enjoys provoking some people. My guess is the latter, for I find it difficult to believe that people can actually be that stupid![/QUOTE]
tell me whats so stupid about this? who do you think mozart is? god? he was a human and overrated as hell
Freddie is alot better musician, wrote many more catchy and good songs than him, i dont care if mozart had more skills. Freddie is also the best singer of all time and cant be beaten
conclusion.. Freddie=God of all music
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]~-:Moet et Chandon:-~ wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Who the hell is "Treasure Moment" !? Zebonka, I presume that's sarcasm, though I don't who you were referring to...[/QUOTE]
Haha sorry, I assumed you might know. Treasure Moment is Atheist's band.
And, up until now I sort of believed Atheist was being serious in his generous comments about his band, but the post just above mine clearly demonstrates he's just kidding...
It was a lot more fun when I thought he was genuine :/
Haha sorry, I assumed you might know. Treasure Moment is Atheist's band.
And, up until now I sort of believed Atheist was being serious in his generous comments about his band, but the post just above mine clearly demonstrates he's just kidding...
It was a lot more fun when I thought he was genuine :/
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Zebonka12 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]~-:Moet et Chandon:-~ wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Who the hell is "Treasure Moment" !? Zebonka, I presume that's sarcasm, though I don't who you were referring to...[/QUOTE]
Haha sorry, I assumed you might know. Treasure Moment is Atheist's band.
And, up until now I sort of believed Atheist was being serious in his generous comments about his band, but the post just above mine clearly demonstrates he's just kidding...
It was a lot more fun when I thought he was genuine :/[/QUOTE]
im not kidding anything, i seriously mean everything i write
Haha sorry, I assumed you might know. Treasure Moment is Atheist's band.
And, up until now I sort of believed Atheist was being serious in his generous comments about his band, but the post just above mine clearly demonstrates he's just kidding...
It was a lot more fun when I thought he was genuine :/[/QUOTE]
im not kidding anything, i seriously mean everything i write
Back to Queen vs Beatles: have you noticed how both bands changed their music at the same time as their hair?
Teehee. Queen always looked decent though. Beatles, circa Abbey Road/Let It Be/etc. looked downright ridiculous! Ten points to Queen :D