[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]John S Stuart wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
I have already stated that I have no problems with negotiations - I think that should be safe enough - but I expect, if I treat you with respect, than you could at least return the same common courtesy.
Now it matters not who is right - or who is wrong here. Perhaps we both are to an extent. But surely the main thing is to remove all obstacles without any creating more?[/QUOTE]
I´ve read the other topics, and i realise that you´re open to negotiations, and it´s up to them to accept the terms.
But, what type of deal have you pourposed to QP?
I know that after so many replys from both of you, it´s not easy to find it, but what are the conditions you want, from now on to "guive" some recordings to QP?
I´m sorry if you´ve already answered this, but i can´t read all of it again to find it : )
Take care
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Hmmm...so a word like "Sibelius" will be the deciding factor in why GG will never get released offically? Thanks GB and JSS. Is this also why other shit, like Hammy 75 and 79, Earls Court, etc will never get released??? FOR FUCKS SAKE!!! Stop thinking about yourselves and do what's best for Queen and the music. GET IT OUT TO THE FANS.
Re: Brooks' proposal -
Yes, by all means, eliminate the self-aggrandizing and antagonizing middle man and let the real parties in interest get down to brass tacks.
Yes, by all means, eliminate the self-aggrandizing and antagonizing middle man and let the real parties in interest get down to brass tacks.
Now seriously...
Do you really think that Queen Productions would even CONSIDER releasing Golders Green?
This discussion is completely senseless.
Do you really think that Queen Productions would even CONSIDER releasing Golders Green?
This discussion is completely senseless.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Mr. Scully wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Now seriously...
Do you really think that Queen Productions would even CONSIDER releasing Golders Green?
This discussion is completely senseless.[/QUOTE]
That's the MAIN problem.
IF QP gets the recording, I doubt they WILL release it
Do you really think that Queen Productions would even CONSIDER releasing Golders Green?
This discussion is completely senseless.[/QUOTE]
That's the MAIN problem.
IF QP gets the recording, I doubt they WILL release it
It will never see the light of day as a individual release but may form part of a box set one day.
If I was John, I'd make sure I had a copy of it before I handed it over to QPL. I mean, if it was accidently leaked the day after John's cheque cleared that would be pure co-incidence wouldnt it! Unless he's after a percentage of the royalties that it.
I'm just being devious but it may make John feel better after his past dealings with them.
If I was John, I'd make sure I had a copy of it before I handed it over to QPL. I mean, if it was accidently leaked the day after John's cheque cleared that would be pure co-incidence wouldnt it! Unless he's after a percentage of the royalties that it.
I'm just being devious but it may make John feel better after his past dealings with them.
Whether or not it gets released is another topic altogether, however, nothing can happen unless John deals with Greg, so frankly as far as I can see at the moment nothing is what we will get!
QP isn't going to release anything the hardcore fans want to see, only recycled product.
I rarely post here but I read quite often and I am frankly sick to death of GB's huge ego and constant stirring of the pot. On most internet forums he would be called a TROLL and would be banned. Why WalmartZone won't do that is beyond me. He contributes little valuable info to the discussion other than being a complete and utter asshole.
I rarely post here but I read quite often and I am frankly sick to death of GB's huge ego and constant stirring of the pot. On most internet forums he would be called a TROLL and would be banned. Why WalmartZone won't do that is beyond me. He contributes little valuable info to the discussion other than being a complete and utter asshole.
you do realise that JSS and Queen Archivist are the same person, right?
Funny, I have thought about that possibility also. But then it seemed too crazy to me. And too well-done.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]The Fonz wrote: [/QUOTENAME]you do realise that JSS and Queen Archivist are the same person, right?
[/QUOTE]
What do you smoke, pal ?
[/QUOTE]
What do you smoke, pal ?
One would hope that these two were talking behind the scenes however I suspect it's all gone silent due to all the talk just being talk as usual!
I have to say that whilst I might be unlikely to buy it should it be released it is a great shame if this tape can't find it's way back to the Queen vaults, I think both parties have to take the blame for that should it never happen.
Greg may well be irritating at times but I do think barbs aside she was genuine here in his offer to put Johns proposal forward. John on the other hand seems incapable of communicating without getting so bogged down by nonsense that he fails to get beyond playground level.
Such a shame, but as they say talk is cheap!
I have to say that whilst I might be unlikely to buy it should it be released it is a great shame if this tape can't find it's way back to the Queen vaults, I think both parties have to take the blame for that should it never happen.
Greg may well be irritating at times but I do think barbs aside she was genuine here in his offer to put Johns proposal forward. John on the other hand seems incapable of communicating without getting so bogged down by nonsense that he fails to get beyond playground level.
Such a shame, but as they say talk is cheap!
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Togg wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
I have to say that whilst I might be unlikely to buy it should it be released it is a great shame if this tape can't find it's way back to the Queen vaults, I think both parties have to take the blame for that should it never happen.
[/QUOTE]
Back to the QPL vault? It was never there in the first place. It's a BBC tape, made by the BBC for the BBC, and the copyright resides with the BBC (I think).
And as far as I understand it, the only reason QPL don't have it is because they didn't buy it when it was on the open market.
I have to say that whilst I might be unlikely to buy it should it be released it is a great shame if this tape can't find it's way back to the Queen vaults, I think both parties have to take the blame for that should it never happen.
[/QUOTE]
Back to the QPL vault? It was never there in the first place. It's a BBC tape, made by the BBC for the BBC, and the copyright resides with the BBC (I think).
And as far as I understand it, the only reason QPL don't have it is because they didn't buy it when it was on the open market.
Never fails to amaze me how folk read so much into every word on this site...
When I say back, I just mean the fact that in theory QP should have serious format versions of all major Queen events. To be honest I am sure the BBC would have been happy to supply a dupe version at the time had they been asked!
When I say back, I just mean the fact that in theory QP should have serious format versions of all major Queen events. To be honest I am sure the BBC would have been happy to supply a dupe version at the time had they been asked!
It'd be decades before anyone would see dividends should this recording ever be handed out. For one thing, there's not a chance in hell that the setlist is 'interesting' enough to the Lowest Common Denominator for it to be an individual release. Which would place it in a compilation of sorts ; either rare things in general, or just live stuff. Which would probably mean you wouldn't hear all of it. (Unless it was on BLU-RAY!! Hah, do I get royalties for bringing that up?).
Flea Market Montgomery.
Flea Market Montgomery.