Thread
Posts in chronological order
Hey thanks, I'm gonna check it
Nice try. Announced as flac but actually mp3.
This was NOT funny. Asshole. Thank you for wasting my time.
Is it REALLY the first night of Edinburgh 76?
or is it the common 02/09/76 gig?
or is it the common 02/09/76 gig?
It´s the common gig of the 2nd septembre!
W.
W.
Well, at least it wasn't someone new. We don't need any more people who aim to ruin recordings.
Nice to know the nail is in the coffin for this show. I guess most people don't want to know how much better the lower gen tape sounds.
Nice to know the nail is in the coffin for this show. I guess most people don't want to know how much better the lower gen tape sounds.
Gym bitch wtf is your problem.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]bohemianmoomin wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Gym bitch wtf is your problem.[/QUOTE]
He's partying like it's 1999, when mp3 is the best digital audio format.
He's partying like it's 1999, when mp3 is the best digital audio format.
Hey, Mike Vans back! Different name, same childish bullshit. And I'm still in his signature, I feel so special.
Preserving quality is such a simple concept...i don't understand how anyone could actually be against it, and i'd love to know what their arguments are.
Anybod could be gentle to share again this concert?$0Thanks a lot!$0
If you really want the common 2-9-76 show in mp3, I can share it if I still have it, but I think I deleted it because the sound quality was much worse than VG+. Obviously I do not have the 1-9-76 show.
I will return to the US from India on Nov 15th, and can check if I have it ... if you want the TWO-9-76 show in mp3.
Ah ... I recall that I did this flac/mp3 scam prank a few weeks before I regretfully shared Sir GH's great Cologne 1979 compilation in mp3 in a misguided retalliation attempt.
I will return to the US from India on Nov 15th, and can check if I have it ... if you want the TWO-9-76 show in mp3.
Ah ... I recall that I did this flac/mp3 scam prank a few weeks before I regretfully shared Sir GH's great Cologne 1979 compilation in mp3 in a misguided retalliation attempt.
[QUOTE]
[b]Gym Bitch wrote: [/b]
Ah ... I recall that I did this flac/mp3 scam prank a few weeks before I regretfully shared Sir GH's great Cologne 1979 compilation in mp3 in a misguided retalliation attempt.
[/QUOTE]
And just think, if you hadn't done that, a version from a lower gen tape might've been posted here ages ago...
But at least you owned up to it...
[b]Gym Bitch wrote: [/b]
Ah ... I recall that I did this flac/mp3 scam prank a few weeks before I regretfully shared Sir GH's great Cologne 1979 compilation in mp3 in a misguided retalliation attempt.
[/QUOTE]
And just think, if you hadn't done that, a version from a lower gen tape might've been posted here ages ago...
But at least you owned up to it...
I had over-reacted, and interpreted (as censorship) your request for the poster to remove the lossy 2-9-76 in trade for you uploading 19-6-86 in flac. I should not have stooped to such a low level of sharing Cologne 79 in mp3 when you specifically requested it not be shared in mp3.
Before and after the "Cologne 79" incident, I have always respected the uploader's boilerplate request to not share in mp3 despite disagreeing with the request.
By the way, Peter Patrao (from Panchgani) indirectly "insulted" you. He thought that I was from Canada, before I told him I was an American from Chicago.
Before and after the "Cologne 79" incident, I have always respected the uploader's boilerplate request to not share in mp3 despite disagreeing with the request.
By the way, Peter Patrao (from Panchgani) indirectly "insulted" you. He thought that I was from Canada, before I told him I was an American from Chicago.