Queen: The Royal Years - Zoom 1979 (4CDs)
MP3 192kbs
File-Sizes: 3X95.78 Mb, 54.99 Mb
Live In Osaka - Zoom 1979
CD 1:
01 - We Will Rock You
02 - Let Me Entertain You
03 - Somebody To Love
04 - Fat Bottomed Girls
05 - Death On Two Legs
06 - Killer Queen
07 - Bicycle Race
08 - I'm In Love With My Car
09 - Get Down Make Love
10 - You're My Best Friend
11 - Now I'm Here
12 - Don't Stop Me Now
13 - Spread Your Wings
14 - Dreamer's Ball
CD 2:
01 - Love Of My Life
02 - '39
03 - It's Late
04 - Brighton Rock
05 - Keep Yourself Alive
06 - Bohemian Rhapsody
07 - Tie Your Mother Down
08 - Sheer Heart Attack
09 - We Will Rock You
10 - We Are The Champions
11 - God Save The Queen
CD 3:
01 - We Will Rock You
02 - Let Me Entertain You
03 - Somebody To Love
04 - If You Can't Beat Them
05 - Death On Two Legs
06 - Killer Queen
07 - Bicycle Race
08 - I'm In Love With My Car
09 - Get Down Make Love
10 - You're My Best Friend
11 - Now I'm Here
12 - Teo Torriatte
13 - Don't Stop Me Now
14 - Dreamer's Ball
15 - Love Of My Life
CD 4:
01 - '39
02 - It's Late
03 - Brighton Rock
04 - Keep Yourself Alive
05 - Bohemian Rhapsody
06 - Tie Your Mother Down
07 - Sheer Heart Attack
08 - We Will Rock You
09 - We Are The Champions
10 - God Save The Queen
http://rs126.rapidshare.com/files/31367084/q_try.part1.rar
http://rs8.rapidshare.com/files/31369511/q_try.part2.rar
http://rs47.rapidshare.com/files/31371744/q_try.part3.rar
http://rs32.rapidshare.com/files/31372980/q_try.part4.rar
Enjoy.!
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Here the covers:
And here:
Thanks Alex, please follow his link, there is another torrent for the Flac files, just given by Alex Solan one post before, so please follow this better one, and convert it to mp3 yourself after that if you really need it for your personal use !!!
Thanks a lot,
Regards,
Olivier,
France
Thanks a lot,
Regards,
Olivier,
France
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Alex Solan. wrote: [/QUOTENAME]<font><font size=4><b>http://www.queenzone.com/queenzone/forumnew/forum_topic_view.aspx?Q=377089 </b></font>[/QUOTE]
THIS TORRENT IS FROM 2004.
THIS TORRENT IS FROM 2004.
... and still running it seems.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]seba_979 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Alex Solan. wrote: [/QUOTENAME]<font><font size=4><b>http://www.queenzone.com/queenzone/forumnew/forum_topic_view.aspx?Q=377089 </b></font>[/QUOTE]
THIS TORRENT IS FROM 2004.[/QUOTE]
Your point being?
There are a lot of old torrents here still running. the fact that theire old is no excuse for spreading inferior versions of shows.
THIS TORRENT IS FROM 2004.[/QUOTE]
Your point being?
There are a lot of old torrents here still running. the fact that theire old is no excuse for spreading inferior versions of shows.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]g_pretender wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]seba_979 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Alex Solan. wrote: [/QUOTENAME]<font><font size=4><b>http://www.queenzone.com/queenzone/forumnew/forum_topic_view.aspx?Q=377089 </b></font>[/QUOTE]
THIS TORRENT IS FROM 2004.[/QUOTE]
Your point being?
There are a lot of old torrents here still running. the fact that theire old is no excuse for spreading inferior versions of shows.[/QUOTE]
...that's a bit harsh isn't it? I mean the guy is sharing something with you all for fucks
sake. Be a little more curtious when pointing out there's a better version to be had.
THIS TORRENT IS FROM 2004.[/QUOTE]
Your point being?
There are a lot of old torrents here still running. the fact that theire old is no excuse for spreading inferior versions of shows.[/QUOTE]
...that's a bit harsh isn't it? I mean the guy is sharing something with you all for fucks
sake. Be a little more curtious when pointing out there's a better version to be had.
Yes, we're glad that a Queenzoner happily shares this, no problem with that. I just wanted to precise that it was a mp3 version, and someone said a Flac version was shared elsewhere !
So sorry if you found myself a little aggressive or something, I didn't feel that way, just wanted to inform people !
Anyway, it should be a sort of rule (said or unsaid) that the mp3 version of a gig could not be shared if the Flac version exists and is shared at the same time. Some are also thinking that the mp3 versions could not be shared, only the Flac ones, and I can understand that way of thinking, but it seems that it can't be made here on queenzone... But this was already said somewhere on Queenzone recently...
so, sorry if being offensive, but happy that people are informed that the Flac version is still there !
Regards,
Olivier,
France.
So sorry if you found myself a little aggressive or something, I didn't feel that way, just wanted to inform people !
Anyway, it should be a sort of rule (said or unsaid) that the mp3 version of a gig could not be shared if the Flac version exists and is shared at the same time. Some are also thinking that the mp3 versions could not be shared, only the Flac ones, and I can understand that way of thinking, but it seems that it can't be made here on queenzone... But this was already said somewhere on Queenzone recently...
so, sorry if being offensive, but happy that people are informed that the Flac version is still there !
Regards,
Olivier,
France.
Well, I finally decided to bring my own vegetables to the flac/mp3 soup that's been boiling here.
I'm not quite sure if it's my own stupidity or the powerlessness of my computer, but I can't really play flac files without an occasional memory break (even though I have 2 gigabytes of RAM, and the processor is not too bad either), much less convert the flac files to mp3/wav if I really wanted to. The results are more horrible than a thoroughly scratched vinyl that can't go 5 seconds without getting stuck. Also, flacs aren't very friendly with non-computer-type audio playing devices. While the quality is rather important in filesharing, I have to admit that I'd rather have mp3's because of their usability.
In all fairness, the wav files aren't THAT much larger to seed, and they're at least as good as the flac files. If someone wants to share or to have mp3's, then by all means share them, if they're reasonably good (at least 192kbps/44kHz, maybe variable).
I'm not quite sure if it's my own stupidity or the powerlessness of my computer, but I can't really play flac files without an occasional memory break (even though I have 2 gigabytes of RAM, and the processor is not too bad either), much less convert the flac files to mp3/wav if I really wanted to. The results are more horrible than a thoroughly scratched vinyl that can't go 5 seconds without getting stuck. Also, flacs aren't very friendly with non-computer-type audio playing devices. While the quality is rather important in filesharing, I have to admit that I'd rather have mp3's because of their usability.
In all fairness, the wav files aren't THAT much larger to seed, and they're at least as good as the flac files. If someone wants to share or to have mp3's, then by all means share them, if they're reasonably good (at least 192kbps/44kHz, maybe variable).
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]JacquesDaniels wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Well, I finally decided to bring my own vegetables to the flac/mp3 soup that's been boiling here.
I'm not quite sure if it's my own stupidity or the powerlessness of my computer, but I can't really play flac files without an occasional memory break (even though I have 2 gigabytes of RAM, and the processor is not too bad either), much less convert the flac files to mp3/wav if I really wanted to.
[/QUOTE]
Usually in this type of errors the problems is between the monitor and the chair.
[QUOTE]
The results are more horrible than a thoroughly scratched vinyl that can't go 5 seconds without getting stuck.
[/QUOTE]
Wow, what software are you using to play flac files?
[QUOTE]
Also, flacs aren't very friendly with non-computer-type audio playing devices. [/QUOTE]
Yes, that's unfortunatelly still true, but there are more and more hardware players with flac support.
[QUOTE]
While the quality is rather important in filesharing, I have to admit that I'd rather have mp3's because of their usability.
[/QUOTE]
Sure, why not ? Is there a problem to create the mp3s yourself ?
[QUOTE]
In all fairness, the wav files aren't THAT much larger to seed, and they're at least as good as the flac files.
[/QUOTE]
Unless a stupid error occurs in the encoding phase, the audio information in the wav files is exactly the same as the audio on the flac files.
[QUOTE]
If someone wants to share or to have mp3's, then by all means share them, if they're reasonably good (at least 192kbps/44kHz, maybe variable).[/QUOTE]
Actually 192kbps is pretty bad, at least for my ears. I encode all mp3s for my mp3 player at 256kbps
I'm not quite sure if it's my own stupidity or the powerlessness of my computer, but I can't really play flac files without an occasional memory break (even though I have 2 gigabytes of RAM, and the processor is not too bad either), much less convert the flac files to mp3/wav if I really wanted to.
[/QUOTE]
Usually in this type of errors the problems is between the monitor and the chair.
[QUOTE]
The results are more horrible than a thoroughly scratched vinyl that can't go 5 seconds without getting stuck.
[/QUOTE]
Wow, what software are you using to play flac files?
[QUOTE]
Also, flacs aren't very friendly with non-computer-type audio playing devices. [/QUOTE]
Yes, that's unfortunatelly still true, but there are more and more hardware players with flac support.
[QUOTE]
While the quality is rather important in filesharing, I have to admit that I'd rather have mp3's because of their usability.
[/QUOTE]
Sure, why not ? Is there a problem to create the mp3s yourself ?
[QUOTE]
In all fairness, the wav files aren't THAT much larger to seed, and they're at least as good as the flac files.
[/QUOTE]
Unless a stupid error occurs in the encoding phase, the audio information in the wav files is exactly the same as the audio on the flac files.
[QUOTE]
If someone wants to share or to have mp3's, then by all means share them, if they're reasonably good (at least 192kbps/44kHz, maybe variable).[/QUOTE]
Actually 192kbps is pretty bad, at least for my ears. I encode all mp3s for my mp3 player at 256kbps
damn... I didn't want to start the mp3/Flac war again... sorry guys !
Such a shame your computer doesn't want to play Flac files, my computer is some years old now, and eveything goes fine. Well, if I was in your case I think I would share/download/upload the Flac files, in order not to share something with minor quality if you can keep somewhere on discs or hard drive the lossless ones. I would then convert myself the Flac to mp3 if my computer was not able to read the Flac files correctly !
But maybe the problem comes from your music player, just check if it has been updated and re-install the plugin for Flac, maybe ....
Hope your problems will be sorted soon, very sad to know a queenzoner can't benefit from quality.
Regards,
Olivier,
France.
Such a shame your computer doesn't want to play Flac files, my computer is some years old now, and eveything goes fine. Well, if I was in your case I think I would share/download/upload the Flac files, in order not to share something with minor quality if you can keep somewhere on discs or hard drive the lossless ones. I would then convert myself the Flac to mp3 if my computer was not able to read the Flac files correctly !
But maybe the problem comes from your music player, just check if it has been updated and re-install the plugin for Flac, maybe ....
Hope your problems will be sorted soon, very sad to know a queenzoner can't benefit from quality.
Regards,
Olivier,
France.
Well, no harm done. This'll go on probably as long as any type of digital, non-physical media finally conquers the good old CD's and whatnot.
What comes of the encoding quality of mp3's, I can agree that 192 isn't that good - I do hear the packaging artifacts most of the time the encoding produces, but it depends very much on the original recording, how bad the mp3 will be. But I can tolerate 192 most of the time, because whenever I listen to mp3's, I'm not usually in an environment where it makes much difference. 256 is alright, almost near perfect, sort of, but there's still a possibility that you'll hear some bad encoding in some songs, if you concentrate enough. Also, depends on the equipment you're listening the music on.
I can't really remember which programs I've tried in the converting progress, but they (all of them, I think I've tried 3 or 4 different ones) failed miserably in producing anything listenable. To play flac files, I've tried some standalone flac player, which I found uselessly memory-hungry. Can't remember the name. I've also tried WinAmp with flac plugin. Only one word could describe my experience: "argh."
Quoting "Sure, why not ? Is there a problem to create the mp3s yourself ?" , you must've missed something I said earlier in my message. Creating mp3s from flac files, for me, has so far been unsuccessful, and I have no idea why.
Oh well. If flacs were more user-friendly, I'd be happy to support using them. For now though, I can't agree with some of your's opinion in going flac-only, if it's possible. But then, I prefer vinyls to CD's anyway...
What comes of the encoding quality of mp3's, I can agree that 192 isn't that good - I do hear the packaging artifacts most of the time the encoding produces, but it depends very much on the original recording, how bad the mp3 will be. But I can tolerate 192 most of the time, because whenever I listen to mp3's, I'm not usually in an environment where it makes much difference. 256 is alright, almost near perfect, sort of, but there's still a possibility that you'll hear some bad encoding in some songs, if you concentrate enough. Also, depends on the equipment you're listening the music on.
I can't really remember which programs I've tried in the converting progress, but they (all of them, I think I've tried 3 or 4 different ones) failed miserably in producing anything listenable. To play flac files, I've tried some standalone flac player, which I found uselessly memory-hungry. Can't remember the name. I've also tried WinAmp with flac plugin. Only one word could describe my experience: "argh."
Quoting "Sure, why not ? Is there a problem to create the mp3s yourself ?" , you must've missed something I said earlier in my message. Creating mp3s from flac files, for me, has so far been unsuccessful, and I have no idea why.
Oh well. If flacs were more user-friendly, I'd be happy to support using them. For now though, I can't agree with some of your's opinion in going flac-only, if it's possible. But then, I prefer vinyls to CD's anyway...
I'm sick of this, seba all your uploads were shared here in FLAC, and the torrents still alive...if something is in FLAC...DON'T SPREAD AS MP3, can't you get it?