[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Alex Solan. wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I'll upload to Dime right now ;-)[/QUOTE]
Okay. No problem at all.
So my next upload at Dime will be either Madrid 2005 complete or Cologne 2005 complete... both audio.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color="blue">Maruga wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Alex Solan. wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I'll upload to Dime right now ;-)[/QUOTE]
Okay. No problem at all.
So my next upload at Dime will be either Madrid 2005 complete or Cologne 2005 complete... both audio.[/QUOTE]
Nice.
Okay. No problem at all.
So my next upload at Dime will be either Madrid 2005 complete or Cologne 2005 complete... both audio.[/QUOTE]
Nice.
Thank you very much for your work to better this show, as well as the original ULer!!
I've uploaded this torrent also to Dime
http://www.dimeadozen.org/torrents-details.php?id=179502
Lose Yourself intro removed on that torrent due to Dime's policies.
http://www.dimeadozen.org/torrents-details.php?id=179502
Lose Yourself intro removed on that torrent due to Dime's policies.
Edit
My rant about the lack of quality standards in the Queen trading community removed because now I see this is a "first generation" recording. But still, shows less than 3 years old should have more information than that. And really, why is this a first gen? Is it a first gen dat or analogue tape? That is an important thing piece of information to pass along. These things do matter.
My rant about the lack of quality standards in the Queen trading community removed because now I see this is a "first generation" recording. But still, shows less than 3 years old should have more information than that. And really, why is this a first gen? Is it a first gen dat or analogue tape? That is an important thing piece of information to pass along. These things do matter.
At least he did'nt add god save the queen to the setlist, like your Slane 86 recording.
Marknow, let's see here, I was talking to the Queen community in general not to anyone in particular. And so really, you went through my entire website, found one fuck-up (mis-typing "God Save The Queen" when I meant "Outro,") and you want to hold it against me? Is that right? I've fixed it now, so don't you fret about it. To whomever shared this in any way, it's not your fault you don't have the lineage (unless you purposefully withheld it) but exactly why it is that a show less than 3 years old doesn't have exact lineage is beyond me.
If u think i went thru your entire site to find fault with it your on drugs. Im after a good copy of Slane for years, it was the first and only place i looked. Your talking about lineage here, but its ok for u to mislable track lists. And heaven forbid anyone should Kindly point it out.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]josedequeso wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Edit
My rant about the lack of quality standards in the Queen trading community removed because now I see this is a "first generation" recording. But still, shows less than 3 years old should have more information than that. And really, why is this a first gen? Is it a first gen dat or analogue tape? That is an important thing piece of information to pass along. These things do matter.
[/QUOTE]
I'm sorry for not giving you a correct accuracy in the information.
I'm not trying to be rude or something, but I'm sharing all what I've got, instead of keep requesting for a fu**ing trade, which I'm not interest to, I only want to share what I have, and see other people sharing what they've got.
Once again, I repeat this: Ask the owner of http://www.geocities.com/tradiogaga (_Tatterdemalion_ I think) about more details, because that's where I got this from.
Period.
My rant about the lack of quality standards in the Queen trading community removed because now I see this is a "first generation" recording. But still, shows less than 3 years old should have more information than that. And really, why is this a first gen? Is it a first gen dat or analogue tape? That is an important thing piece of information to pass along. These things do matter.
[/QUOTE]
I'm sorry for not giving you a correct accuracy in the information.
I'm not trying to be rude or something, but I'm sharing all what I've got, instead of keep requesting for a fu**ing trade, which I'm not interest to, I only want to share what I have, and see other people sharing what they've got.
Once again, I repeat this: Ask the owner of http://www.geocities.com/tradiogaga (_Tatterdemalion_ I think) about more details, because that's where I got this from.
Period.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Marknow wrote: [/QUOTENAME]If u think i went thru your entire site to find fault with it your on drugs. Im after a good copy of Slane for years, it was the first and only place i looked. Your talking about lineage here, but its ok for u to mislable track lists. And heaven forbid anyone should Kindly point it out.[/QUOTE]
Regardless of whether or not I'm on drugs, I didn't think you went through my entire site, you are familiar with exaggerations right? In my interpretation of the English language, "at least" is a very condescending and arrogant way of putting something, so that's how I take it, I certainly wouldn’t call it “kindly pointing it out.”
My copy of the Slane 86 show is the upgrade you're looking for, so send me an email if you want.
I corrected the track list, thanks for bringing it to my attention. I’m happy to be corrected, your tone just wasn’t the friendliest.
And I still believe, more information should be attached to new recordings.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color="blue">Maruga wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I'm sorry for not giving you a correct accuracy in the information.
I'm not trying to be rude or something, but I'm sharing all what I've got, instead of keep requesting for a fu**ing trade, which I'm not interest to, I only want to share what I have, and see other people sharing what they've got[/QUOTE]
I wasn’t going after you of course, anyone who had it before you and failed to attach the lineage because either they didn’t care or it took too much time to write, they are the ones who should apologize, not you Maruga.
Regardless of whether or not I'm on drugs, I didn't think you went through my entire site, you are familiar with exaggerations right? In my interpretation of the English language, "at least" is a very condescending and arrogant way of putting something, so that's how I take it, I certainly wouldn’t call it “kindly pointing it out.”
My copy of the Slane 86 show is the upgrade you're looking for, so send me an email if you want.
I corrected the track list, thanks for bringing it to my attention. I’m happy to be corrected, your tone just wasn’t the friendliest.
And I still believe, more information should be attached to new recordings.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color="blue">Maruga wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I'm sorry for not giving you a correct accuracy in the information.
I'm not trying to be rude or something, but I'm sharing all what I've got, instead of keep requesting for a fu**ing trade, which I'm not interest to, I only want to share what I have, and see other people sharing what they've got[/QUOTE]
I wasn’t going after you of course, anyone who had it before you and failed to attach the lineage because either they didn’t care or it took too much time to write, they are the ones who should apologize, not you Maruga.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Alex Solan. wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Well done, Alex!
But it shouldn't be "AUD > ?? > WAV......", as it was specified in the original torrent that it was "first generation." But on a recording this recent, you'd think more information would be available...
[/QUOTE]
Thanks Bob,
What I tried to say with "??" is that I don't know the equipment used by the bootlegger to record this gig ;-)[/QUOTE]
Okay... I see. But that's more of the "transfer", not the lineage.
AUD > WAV is still missing something. "First gen" for a recording from the 70s probably means a first gen cassette from a cassette master, but for a recording this recent, what kind of generation is it? For example, a minidisc master to a DAT tape technically wouldn't be a generation, as long as it's transfered properly. Regardless, this information should not be lost on a recording that is less than three years old. I have never seen such lack of care in any other trading community. The days of "taking down only date and venue and calling it a day" were over years ago, except for in the Queen community. I seriously wonder why it ended up that way... I have no idea.
That said, I'd be very surprised if this torrent wasn't pulled from Dime.
But it shouldn't be "AUD > ?? > WAV......", as it was specified in the original torrent that it was "first generation." But on a recording this recent, you'd think more information would be available...
[/QUOTE]
Thanks Bob,
What I tried to say with "??" is that I don't know the equipment used by the bootlegger to record this gig ;-)[/QUOTE]
Okay... I see. But that's more of the "transfer", not the lineage.
AUD > WAV is still missing something. "First gen" for a recording from the 70s probably means a first gen cassette from a cassette master, but for a recording this recent, what kind of generation is it? For example, a minidisc master to a DAT tape technically wouldn't be a generation, as long as it's transfered properly. Regardless, this information should not be lost on a recording that is less than three years old. I have never seen such lack of care in any other trading community. The days of "taking down only date and venue and calling it a day" were over years ago, except for in the Queen community. I seriously wonder why it ended up that way... I have no idea.
That said, I'd be very surprised if this torrent wasn't pulled from Dime.
It won't be pulled from Dime since I've seen tons of AUD recordings without a proper lineage or lacking important information, haha!
I'll try to track down the original details and lineage for this recording ;-)
I'll try to track down the original details and lineage for this recording ;-)
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Alex Solan. wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I'll try to track down the original details and lineage for this recording ;-)[/QUOTE]
Awesome... good luck! :)
Awesome... good luck! :)
Thanks to Maruga and Alex Solan for the share and the remaster respectively. I missed the "rant" but I have to remind you that there is no Queenzone rule that requires the complete lineage. As a result nobody needs to apologize - certainly not the guy who traded the audio to Maruga and certainly not anybody who shares it or takes the time to remaster it. I also don't believe the torrent will be removed from Dime because they are not that dogmatic to think it's better to have no recording than a recording with an incomplete lineage.
I wish people would stop to attack the sharers, it's very detrimental to the sharing on this website.
I wish people would stop to attack the sharers, it's very detrimental to the sharing on this website.
Thanks, Alex!