Queen Live In Montreal, 1st December 1978, Flac (from the continental Sound

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]ruth.olivier wrote: [/QUOTENAME]This is not the Gipsy Eye release (called Live Achievements if I am right)[/QUOTE]

Right, that's the one. It is a prime example of how brutally a bootleg label can destroy the quality of a beautiful recording before putting it on the market.

This version from Continental Sounds is great, except it runs a half-semitone too slow. My best copy is an unconfirmed low gen, and the quality is virtually identical to this one.

I have "Best of Montreal".
Can anybody confirm that this is a better version ?

Thanks to ruth.olivier for the upload, THIS is how a upload should look like !

BUT could somebody please make a torrent or put it to mediafire ?

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]pittrek wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
BUT could somebody please make a torrent or put it to mediafire ?[/QUOTE]

I made one last night - here's the link:

http://www.queenzone.com/queenzone/forumnew/forum_topic_view.aspx?Q=1074103

I love Roger's screams before Dreamers Ball, if my mind serves me right.

Thanks for sharing!

thanks for sharing!

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Ginger01 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]pittrek wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
BUT could somebody please make a torrent or put it to mediafire ?[/QUOTE]

I made one last night - here's the link:

http://www.queenzone.com/queenzone/forumnew/forum_topic_view.aspx?Q=1074103[/QUOTE]

Oops, I'm actually downloading it :-) Thanks

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]pittrek wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I have "Best of Montreal".
Can anybody confirm that this is a better version ?[/QUOTE]

If you post a small sample, I'll be happy to compare it.

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]pittrek wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I have "Best of Montreal".
Can anybody confirm that this is a better version ?[/QUOTE]

If you post a small sample, I'll be happy to compare it.
[/QUOTE]Please give your opinion about my copy aswell. It should be from the master Here's a link: http://www.mediafire.com/?1mzzbnmpdtm

Thanks for the upload ruth.oliver. Rapidshare works for me! I really like the show...but I have to admid, I corrected the pitch a half semi-tone.

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]on my way up wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Please give your opinion about my copy aswell. It should be from the master Here's a link: http://www.mediafire.com/?1mzzbnmpdtm
[/QUOTE]

From the master? Could you explain about that? Anyway, the sample runs at the correct speed and has a little less hiss, overall it sounds better than this, but I'm skeptical of the master claim. Although I hope I'm wrong!

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]josedequeso wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]on my way up wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Please give your opinion about my copy aswell. It should be from the master Here's a link: http://www.mediafire.com/?1mzzbnmpdtm
[/QUOTE]

From the master? Could you explain about that? Anyway, the sample runs at the correct speed and has a little less hiss, overall it sounds better than this, but I'm skeptical of the master claim. Although I hope I'm wrong![/QUOTE]I got it in a trade and the person who gave it to me had it labeled as master copy. That's why I wrote'should be. That's all I can explain about it actually.

And about your observations:I too found my sample a bit better and at the correct speed:-)Looks like my ears are getting better:-)

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]on my way up wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]josedequeso wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]on my way up wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Please give your opinion about my copy aswell. It should be from the master Here's a link: http://www.mediafire.com/?1mzzbnmpdtm
[/QUOTE]

From the master? Could you explain about that? Anyway, the sample runs at the correct speed and has a little less hiss, overall it sounds better than this, but I'm skeptical of the master claim. Although I hope I'm wrong![/QUOTE]I got it in a trade and the person who gave it to me had it labeled as master copy. That's why I wrote'should be. That's all I can explain about it actually.

And about your observations:I too found my sample a bit better and at the correct speed:-)Looks like my ears are getting better:-)[/QUOTE]
Hm, what about a "share" ? :-) Or maybe a trade ?

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]pittrek wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]on my way up wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]josedequeso wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]on my way up wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Please give your opinion about my copy aswell. It should be from the master Here's a link: http://www.mediafire.com/?1mzzbnmpdtm
[/QUOTE]

From the master? Could you explain about that? Anyway, the sample runs at the correct speed and has a little less hiss, overall it sounds better than this, but I'm skeptical of the master claim. Although I hope I'm wrong![/QUOTE]I got it in a trade and the person who gave it to me had it labeled as master copy. That's why I wrote'should be. That's all I can explain about it actually.

And about your observations:I too found my sample a bit better and at the correct speed:-)Looks like my ears are getting better:-)[/QUOTE]
Hm, what about a "share" ? :-) Or maybe a trade ?[/QUOTE]Some more people can give their opinion and if they want it, I will share it:-)

Pittrek, could you send me your trade-list?
Here's my email foubert_14@hotmail.com

One important note: today I had a day off:-) but until january 31 I have exams so no trades until then! And from 1 february until 8or 9 I go skiing(how do you write that in english:-)

Yep... it's "skiing" :)

(rest of post edited because it made no sense... !!)

to make things clear, this is the third version of montreal 78? right?