http://www.petitiononline.com/mod_perl/signed.cgi?thewiz&1%20target=
*EDIT* Copy and paste the address, as I don't think Queenzone is making it a proper link.
Yeah, that site is owned by the Westboro Baptist Church.
If you have some free time, you might find it amusing to actually message them and say some truths:
http://www.godhatesfags.com/contact.html
I know this is silly, but I was actually laughing while I asked them if they need homosexualism to be banned because they're afraid of feeling tempted to experiment it.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Those people are sick. No life at all, no brain....what a pity. I've send mail to them xD
Einstein was right; "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity."
Einstein was right; "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity."
It's a shame that these people breed, and breed that hatred into their children....
What's the problem? I'm sure god is a non-smoker
I think there's a counter-website at http://www.godlovesfags.com
Unfortunately, i think that's the most effective way of protesting against their website.
They're insane.....i never heard of them until watching Louis Theroux's documentary, i was shocked to say the least!
Unfortunately, i think that's the most effective way of protesting against their website.
They're insane.....i never heard of them until watching Louis Theroux's documentary, i was shocked to say the least!
I love WBC.
They are so insane, it makes me laugh.
xD
They are so insane, it makes me laugh.
xD
I WILL SHOVE A ROCKET UP THEIR SONS ASSES.
A) Legally censoring these people would be an immoral abuse of justice.
B) The website is their own private property. It would also be a miscarriage of justice to dictate what can and cannot be done with their property, as long as it does not infringe upon the rights of others. In this case, it does not.
C) Internet petitions are stupid and have never done anything in the entire history of their existence.
B) The website is their own private property. It would also be a miscarriage of justice to dictate what can and cannot be done with their property, as long as it does not infringe upon the rights of others. In this case, it does not.
C) Internet petitions are stupid and have never done anything in the entire history of their existence.
really what needs to be done, is to punish the child who is throwing a tantrum, and put them in the corner until they shut up, by jus ignoring them.
those people dont even know what theyre standing for anyway, theyre walking contradictions, and really, they should be laughed at more than anything, instead of us 'firing back the hate' cuz really...how would that make the rest of us better? if im not clear enough, i listen to shows taht invite her on, and theyll make fun of her and put her down and tell her shes terrible...where is that getting us?
understandable to call them names and be passionatly against them. i am too. they are hate enablers, technically against themselves. but shes just someone who stands in her yard (that yard being america) and just shouts at it, not with it. she and her stupid little family are the only ones who really agree, and its due to her father, who probably brainwashed her. shes just following an example she was enstilled, and really is just a parrot (from what i understand). so she doesnt know what shes talking about, and has nothing to back her up.
this cycle should be broken by not even letting them have the chance to show up as a protest (there needs to be a clause on the spread of hatred and the level of tactfulness done). i know people would say 'that would be against our rights' and technically, yes it would be to condemn them of their right of free speech and such. but people like these, who spread hatred and pain are a distress are crimes against humanity in its own right.
sorry im ranting. really i just think people should ignore them. they might cry louder, but they just shouldnt even have the time of day to voice themselves (which they really arent, they arent trying to make things work, they talk at you, not with you, so they lose). they, like children will get tired from their tantrums and will fall asleep, eventually unnoticed, and life can go on. the more we fight them, the more we feed an unessesary beast.
those people dont even know what theyre standing for anyway, theyre walking contradictions, and really, they should be laughed at more than anything, instead of us 'firing back the hate' cuz really...how would that make the rest of us better? if im not clear enough, i listen to shows taht invite her on, and theyll make fun of her and put her down and tell her shes terrible...where is that getting us?
understandable to call them names and be passionatly against them. i am too. they are hate enablers, technically against themselves. but shes just someone who stands in her yard (that yard being america) and just shouts at it, not with it. she and her stupid little family are the only ones who really agree, and its due to her father, who probably brainwashed her. shes just following an example she was enstilled, and really is just a parrot (from what i understand). so she doesnt know what shes talking about, and has nothing to back her up.
this cycle should be broken by not even letting them have the chance to show up as a protest (there needs to be a clause on the spread of hatred and the level of tactfulness done). i know people would say 'that would be against our rights' and technically, yes it would be to condemn them of their right of free speech and such. but people like these, who spread hatred and pain are a distress are crimes against humanity in its own right.
sorry im ranting. really i just think people should ignore them. they might cry louder, but they just shouldnt even have the time of day to voice themselves (which they really arent, they arent trying to make things work, they talk at you, not with you, so they lose). they, like children will get tired from their tantrums and will fall asleep, eventually unnoticed, and life can go on. the more we fight them, the more we feed an unessesary beast.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Lady Nyx wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
really i just think people should ignore them. they might cry louder, but they just shouldnt even have the time of day to voice themselves (which they really arent, they arent trying to make things work, they talk at you, not with you, so they lose). they, like children will get tired from their tantrums and will fall asleep, eventually unnoticed, and life can go on. the more we fight them, the more we feed an unessesary beast.
[/QUOTE]
In a perfect world...
...the media wouldn't send to press the plans of this group to picket funerals or memorials
...the media wouldn't give these people air time - how would we know about them in the first place if not for the media?
...the public wouldn't feed into the media frenzy and discuss these people, thereby giving them more power than they actually have
...funeral homes, cemetaries and such, would have their own crew of paid or volunteer 'shields' to protect grieving families from the taunts of these idiots
In a perfect world, these people wouldn't be talked about outside of their own family, and perhaps they would indeed just fade away. But we don't live in a perfect world and so they'll continue to gain fame through fanaticism and we'll continue to shake our heads in disgust as we (definitely myself included) go on to read more and more about them.
really i just think people should ignore them. they might cry louder, but they just shouldnt even have the time of day to voice themselves (which they really arent, they arent trying to make things work, they talk at you, not with you, so they lose). they, like children will get tired from their tantrums and will fall asleep, eventually unnoticed, and life can go on. the more we fight them, the more we feed an unessesary beast.
[/QUOTE]
In a perfect world...
...the media wouldn't send to press the plans of this group to picket funerals or memorials
...the media wouldn't give these people air time - how would we know about them in the first place if not for the media?
...the public wouldn't feed into the media frenzy and discuss these people, thereby giving them more power than they actually have
...funeral homes, cemetaries and such, would have their own crew of paid or volunteer 'shields' to protect grieving families from the taunts of these idiots
In a perfect world, these people wouldn't be talked about outside of their own family, and perhaps they would indeed just fade away. But we don't live in a perfect world and so they'll continue to gain fame through fanaticism and we'll continue to shake our heads in disgust as we (definitely myself included) go on to read more and more about them.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]magicalfreddiemercury wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Lady Nyx wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
really i just think people should ignore them. they might cry louder, but they just shouldnt even have the time of day to voice themselves (which they really arent, they arent trying to make things work, they talk at you, not with you, so they lose). they, like children will get tired from their tantrums and will fall asleep, eventually unnoticed, and life can go on. the more we fight them, the more we feed an unessesary beast.
[/QUOTE]
In a perfect world...
...the media wouldn't send to press the plans of this group to picket funerals or memorials
...the media wouldn't give these people air time - how would we know about them in the first place if not for the media?
...the public wouldn't feed into the media frenzy and discuss these people, thereby giving them more power than they actually have
...funeral homes, cemetaries and such, would have their own crew of paid or volunteer 'shields' to protect grieving families from the taunts of these idiots
In a perfect world, these people wouldn't be talked about outside of their own family, and perhaps they would indeed just fade away. But we don't live in a perfect world and so they'll continue to gain fame through fanaticism and we'll continue to shake our heads in disgust as we (definitely myself included) go on to read more and more about them.
[/QUOTE]
well, it continues my strong distaste for the media. as you said, the only thing it does good is it warns people about this group.
what im curious about is, how do they know these people who have passed are 'gay' or whatever it is they hate this week? (note taht im talking about pre-heath legdger). did they go thru people who have died recently and searched for their orientation or make assumptions?
eventually these people will die out anyway. in the meantime we can growl about them all we want, but i still think now that people are aware of them, it (as you said in a perfect world) just stop being perpetuated.
really i just think people should ignore them. they might cry louder, but they just shouldnt even have the time of day to voice themselves (which they really arent, they arent trying to make things work, they talk at you, not with you, so they lose). they, like children will get tired from their tantrums and will fall asleep, eventually unnoticed, and life can go on. the more we fight them, the more we feed an unessesary beast.
[/QUOTE]
In a perfect world...
...the media wouldn't send to press the plans of this group to picket funerals or memorials
...the media wouldn't give these people air time - how would we know about them in the first place if not for the media?
...the public wouldn't feed into the media frenzy and discuss these people, thereby giving them more power than they actually have
...funeral homes, cemetaries and such, would have their own crew of paid or volunteer 'shields' to protect grieving families from the taunts of these idiots
In a perfect world, these people wouldn't be talked about outside of their own family, and perhaps they would indeed just fade away. But we don't live in a perfect world and so they'll continue to gain fame through fanaticism and we'll continue to shake our heads in disgust as we (definitely myself included) go on to read more and more about them.
[/QUOTE]
well, it continues my strong distaste for the media. as you said, the only thing it does good is it warns people about this group.
what im curious about is, how do they know these people who have passed are 'gay' or whatever it is they hate this week? (note taht im talking about pre-heath legdger). did they go thru people who have died recently and searched for their orientation or make assumptions?
eventually these people will die out anyway. in the meantime we can growl about them all we want, but i still think now that people are aware of them, it (as you said in a perfect world) just stop being perpetuated.
Pass the URL onto 4chan. They're doing such a good job of making a laughing stock of Scientology, it seems they're the only one with balls enough to take up this kind of thing.
Forget your petition. Online petitions are useless.
Forget your petition. Online petitions are useless.
Someone should send this to Brian May... I would love to see that rant!! Hmm.. maybe I should him the story of the church picketing Heath Ledger's funeral..
Or, I could call up my homeboy, Chuck Norris!! One roundhouse kick will straighten things out!
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Lady Nyx wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
what im curious about is, how do they know these people who have passed are 'gay' or whatever it is they hate this week? (note taht im talking about pre-heath legdger). did they go thru people who have died recently and searched for their orientation or make assumptions?
[/QUOTE]
That's one of the pathetic things about this group. It's not that they believe or care whether the person who died was gay, but that AMERICA tolerates gays in its society and military. That's what they're against. It's because of that "sin" that they picket military funerals, and other funerals, that they feel are the results of a "raging mad god's wrath".
Where Heath Ledger's memorials are concerned, the fact that HE played a gay character in a movie disgusts them, but that the film was so successful proves to them that American - and the world - is unrepentant. And so, in their view, god's punishment has now come in the form of Heath Ledger's death.
They're just sick and disgusting people.
what im curious about is, how do they know these people who have passed are 'gay' or whatever it is they hate this week? (note taht im talking about pre-heath legdger). did they go thru people who have died recently and searched for their orientation or make assumptions?
[/QUOTE]
That's one of the pathetic things about this group. It's not that they believe or care whether the person who died was gay, but that AMERICA tolerates gays in its society and military. That's what they're against. It's because of that "sin" that they picket military funerals, and other funerals, that they feel are the results of a "raging mad god's wrath".
Where Heath Ledger's memorials are concerned, the fact that HE played a gay character in a movie disgusts them, but that the film was so successful proves to them that American - and the world - is unrepentant. And so, in their view, god's punishment has now come in the form of Heath Ledger's death.
They're just sick and disgusting people.