[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]bigV wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Benn wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I've always been a subscriber to the conspiracy theory of management / band / producers / enngineers / private collectors actually allowing bits and pieces of rarities to escape from time to time, just for the simplicity of keeping interest and demand at a certain level amongst collectors.[/QUOTE]
I know what you mean. I've always thought so too. Maybe I'm assuming too much, but I've always had the feeling that the Freddie and Michael Jackson tracks were leaked by Greg Brooks or someone else high up when they couldn't get permission to include them in the Freddie Solo Collection. As a silent gesture of goodwill toward us fans.
V.
[/QUOTE]
Well... Courtney Love was well pissed off at Dave Grohl when she noticed that the unreleased Kurt Cobain tracks she didn't want him to release were available for free on the internet...
Way to go, Dave! ;)
Thread
Posts in chronological order
easy:
1. hire white van and buy overalls
2. phone EMI check GB is as lunch
3. enter EMI building, tell desk clerk you are here to collect confidential waste from QPL offices
4. enter archives, put anything labelled "multitracks" into a big white confidential waste sacks
5. leave building and ensure you sign out at desk
6. examine your heist and place on ebay
1. hire white van and buy overalls
2. phone EMI check GB is as lunch
3. enter EMI building, tell desk clerk you are here to collect confidential waste from QPL offices
4. enter archives, put anything labelled "multitracks" into a big white confidential waste sacks
5. leave building and ensure you sign out at desk
6. examine your heist and place on ebay
There's an easier form:
1. Wait for someone to upload multi-tracks
2. Download
3. Sell to naive victims
1. Wait for someone to upload multi-tracks
2. Download
3. Sell to naive victims
Brenski- I don't think they are in EMI building for some reason... ;)
BigV, re:
>leaked by Greg Brooks or someone else high up when they couldn't get permission to include them in the Freddie Solo Collection. As a silent gesture of goodwill toward us fans.
Don't be fooled by Greg - he's nothing more than a puppet whose strings are pulled by the organisation above him. Given his constant lack of ability to *get things right* and *theft* of other people's information, I don't believe for a second that he'd have the humility to appease collectors even if he was told to by higher powers.
Greg likes the control he has over *us* to the extent he does and, in all honesty, who wouldn't?
>leaked by Greg Brooks or someone else high up when they couldn't get permission to include them in the Freddie Solo Collection. As a silent gesture of goodwill toward us fans.
Don't be fooled by Greg - he's nothing more than a puppet whose strings are pulled by the organisation above him. Given his constant lack of ability to *get things right* and *theft* of other people's information, I don't believe for a second that he'd have the humility to appease collectors even if he was told to by higher powers.
Greg likes the control he has over *us* to the extent he does and, in all honesty, who wouldn't?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Fenderek wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Brenski- I don't think they are in EMI building for some reason... ;)[/QUOTE]
Damn...I'd already rented the white van and bought the overalls!
Damn...I'd already rented the white van and bought the overalls!
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Erin wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Fenderek wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Brenski- I don't think they are in EMI building for some reason... ;)[/QUOTE]
Damn...I'd already rented the white van and bought the overalls![/QUOTE]
don't worry - with a little teamwork we'll locate the tapes...ok, they may not be at EMI HQ, but they will be stored in a vault belonging to EMI or Queen somewhere - all we have to do is follow GB to work one day
Damn...I'd already rented the white van and bought the overalls![/QUOTE]
don't worry - with a little teamwork we'll locate the tapes...ok, they may not be at EMI HQ, but they will be stored in a vault belonging to EMI or Queen somewhere - all we have to do is follow GB to work one day
It has been intimated in replies about the leaking of master tapes that students in a music college were using copies of the masters for some coursework.
Do we really honestly think that QP would ever think of allowing this to happen???!!!!
Do we really honestly think that QP would ever think of allowing this to happen???!!!!
yes i do thinnk QP would allow it. think about it. Brian has already said it's his favourite guitar solo...just think how his inflated ego gets stroked by such requests...he'd be shooting his load just thinking about being asked
^^LOL
I think more 24 tracks are going to leak... in classic rock magazine - the edition with the 60th tribute to freddie - mike patton said that he has the ProTools Session of Bicycle Race...
From Queencuttings.com
http://www.queencuttings.com/images/90s/ClassicRock_oct2006_p04.jpg
anyway, i love this 24 track recordings. It's a complete view of the work in the studio. Amazing
From Queencuttings.com
http://www.queencuttings.com/images/90s/ClassicRock_oct2006_p04.jpg
anyway, i love this 24 track recordings. It's a complete view of the work in the studio. Amazing
Just thought I'd add this, which may shed some light on how these masters came to be leaked:
http://www.gearslutz.com/board/music-computers/173997-multitrack-session.html
In particular:
"...they are pro tools dealer demo they gave them to us to show pro tools to clients (even mentionned not to solo lead vox on genie as its crappily autotuned) bob marley, aint no mountain, bohemian, genie, killer queen, all from the same demo pack tath was sent to digi dealers..."
and
"It's illegal because Digidesign and the publishers of the music have only granted permission to their dealers to use the tracks for the specific purpose of customers demo-ing Pro Tools. They almost surely haven't authorized online sharing or duplication of the sessions".
So, if the above is to be believed, QPL/EMI have presumably licensed the use of some of these Queen multitracks to DigiDesign, the makers of ProTools, for the express purpose of showcasing famous multitracks within ProTools.
Food for thought maybe.
http://www.gearslutz.com/board/music-computers/173997-multitrack-session.html
In particular:
"...they are pro tools dealer demo they gave them to us to show pro tools to clients (even mentionned not to solo lead vox on genie as its crappily autotuned) bob marley, aint no mountain, bohemian, genie, killer queen, all from the same demo pack tath was sent to digi dealers..."
and
"It's illegal because Digidesign and the publishers of the music have only granted permission to their dealers to use the tracks for the specific purpose of customers demo-ing Pro Tools. They almost surely haven't authorized online sharing or duplication of the sessions".
So, if the above is to be believed, QPL/EMI have presumably licensed the use of some of these Queen multitracks to DigiDesign, the makers of ProTools, for the express purpose of showcasing famous multitracks within ProTools.
Food for thought maybe.
Jean Genie!!!!!!!!
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Penetration_Guru wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Jean Genie!!!!!!!![/QUOTE]
Nope - it's Christina Aguilera's Genie in A Bottle
It was at http://www.megaupload.com/?d=W8LBHJPC
might still be there
Pro tools format - rename the audio files to WAV
N
Nope - it's Christina Aguilera's Genie in A Bottle
It was at http://www.megaupload.com/?d=W8LBHJPC
might still be there
Pro tools format - rename the audio files to WAV
N
Pass, thanks.