Queen crest Queenzone

ANNOUNCE: Shizuoka 1975 - stark remaster

66 posts Page 4 of 5
Thread

Posts in chronological order

· Member since
Thanks for another remaster.
And great description about your work. it makes us more aware of things.

Take care
· Member since
Thanks a lot!
· Member since
[QUOTE]
Your work on Golders Green 73, Shizuoka 75, and Tokyo 5-1-75 was brilliant, but on this one, I honestly can't tell the difference.
[/QUOTE]

Tried to download Liar but ended up with Lap of the Gods, so I've cut the two sources together to give a comparison. Starts off with the original then switches to the remaster and back again.

Thanks for the comment, Sir GH; obviously I'd rather hear that you loved it, but honesty is the next best thing. :) and at least it means we're not all just accepting these 'remasters' at face value. Let me know your thoughts?

http://www.mediafire.com/?mnmdv2jmi64
· Member since
I've tried to change some artworks I downloaded from somewhere sites:

Here's the back cover (photo is closest to the times)
· Member since
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]gaspar wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I've tried to change some artworks I downloaded from somewhere sites:

Here's the back cover (photo is closest to the times) [/QUOTE]

Thanks for trying but that artwork (I know you didn't made those) it really sucks arse so no point to modify 'em. Nuff with the available ones plus this version you worked on it's very small and you won't get a decent print of it.

;-)
Queen artwork (& others): *new Flickr* https://www.flickr.com/photos/183449549@N02/albums
· Member since
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]stark wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Thanks for the comment, Sir GH; obviously I'd rather hear that you loved it, but honesty is the next best thing. :) and at least it means we're not all just accepting these 'remasters' at face value.[/QUOTE]

Ah, but of course!

[QUOTE]Let me know your thoughts?

http://www.mediafire.com/?mnmdv2jmi64
[/QUOTE]

It's great! But we weren't debating Shizuoka at all. It's Liverpool 73 that I didn't notice a difference in. But I think Liverpool is one of those recordings that isn't good enough quality to begin with to make much of an improvement. Unless you can say/do otherwise..!?
Queenzone is overrun with trolls and circling the drain - join us here instead: http://queenforum.net
· Member since
Stark, are you there?

As I posted in the Glasgow 77 topic, here's a sample of my two-source mix of that show:

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=O7D7QVP0

Perhaps you could work your magic on it...?
Queenzone is overrun with trolls and circling the drain - join us here instead: http://queenforum.net
· Member since
Just off to work so it'll be later (probably mid-afternoon your time) but I'll do my best!
· Member since
Excellent... looking forward to it.
Queenzone is overrun with trolls and circling the drain - join us here instead: http://queenforum.net
· Member since
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Stark, are you there?

As I posted in the Glasgow 77 topic, here's a sample of my two-source mix of that show:

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=O7D7QVP0

Perhaps you could work your magic on it...?
[/QUOTE]

Sir GH - try this for size. Firstly it's a complete mess if you don't know where the edits are. I think the alternative source lasts about 10 seconds at 1m20s (ish) and the rest is all one source. If that is the case, then it just shows how damaging tape generations are - they're almost certainly from the same master.

I chopped out the alternate source section and processed it separately, and the rest was done as a whole. As usual with my samplettes the original version begins each section, so you have the original starting it off, to my remaster, to alt source original/mine, to the remainder switching between the two.

I hope that makes sense. Bear in mind it took me a lot longer to chop the damn things together than it did to process the file, so it's not perfect, but you'll get the idea. Would suggest mastering the two sources separately for editing together.

...and back to you.

http://www.mediafire.com/?9blejjdyvux
· Member since
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]stark wrote: [/QUOTENAME]If that is the case, then it just shows how damaging tape generations are - they're almost certainly from the same master.[/QUOTE]

Exactly... two tape generations can be a world of difference.

[QUOTE]I hope that makes sense.[/QUOTE]

It did!

[QUOTE]Would suggest mastering the two sources separately for editing together.[/QUOTE]

Fully agree. So, if you're up for the task, I'll send you the two raw sources, and you can do the cross-fades in KYA and Jailhouse Rock?

The sample sounds brilliant. Can you send me an email, and we can go from there? I lost your email address in my hard drive crash!
Queenzone is overrun with trolls and circling the drain - join us here instead: http://queenforum.net
· Member since
Fantastic! :) Thank you very much!
· Member since
Please Seed!
I always knew I was a star And now, the rest of the world seems to agree with me-Freddie Mercury
· Member since
Please seed! I got 1 person seeding, but it's going at 0.1 kb/s!
I always knew I was a star And now, the rest of the world seems to agree with me-Freddie Mercury
· Member since
Please seed!
"I really feel like being evil tonight."