[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]fatty wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Assdude,
So you don't think that you're the peron who needs to calm down, do you? Well let's take another look at your original post. In the first paragraph you called Heather Mills a gold digging scum sucking hoe, a drama queen who lives in her own world and a used up XXX slut. The remainder of your post nothing more than a list of fantasy scenarios involving extreme violence. You wanted to burn her legs in a fireplace, use her legs to build a guitar, have her four body gaurds beat the crap out of her and finally batter her head in with a baseball bat. If that's you when you're calm then I'd hate to be around you when you were feeling a bit tetchy.
You go on to accuse me of missing your point. As I read it, the point of your original post was that the settlement in the divorce of two people you don't even know had enraged you to the point where you felt that battering a woman to death was a reasonable course of action. If this was not indeed the case then I cheerfully retract everything I said earlier.
There are at least three other points you have raised that I'm keen to address but I'm an old man and I'm up way past my bedtime so I'll deal with them tomorrow.
fatty.
[/QUOTE]
Oh Fatty,
Its heading towards a tit for tat argument.
I bid you a good night old Sir.
Sleep tight this very evening and rise with shine tomorrow.
A.dude.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]...ASSDUDE.... wrote: [/QUOTENAME]That gold digging scum sucking hoe. It fills me with anger that she has won the divorce settlement. She is a drama queen who lives in her own world. I can’t believe P.M didn’t fight this. She is a used up XXX slut.
Rather than this post being all about my hate and disgust for her, the bitch now wants to move on and find a new man, in which she says is not after her money. Fuck her, fuck her money, id be after her just to put her fucking legs in a fire place and burn, hell id even make a guitar out of her legs, there’s your fucking red special two!
She has no soul. She will now live in between Briton and Europe and will have 4 body guards. I hope she try’s to attack her self, they can use her legs to bet the crap out of her.
How ever, in very recent news, it turns out she has not won the deal and that it is still (http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,23237660-663,00.html ) being postponed.
She needs a good baseball bat swung to the head.
[/QUOTE]
So she got the gold. What's it to Paul McCartney? Now he's got more money than he could possibly spend in 500 000 years instead of more money than he could possibly spend in 1 000 000 years. Do you think that he will lose sleep over the cash? Do you think that the woman will be any happier? I say, if anything, she'll be greedier still.
Rather than this post being all about my hate and disgust for her, the bitch now wants to move on and find a new man, in which she says is not after her money. Fuck her, fuck her money, id be after her just to put her fucking legs in a fire place and burn, hell id even make a guitar out of her legs, there’s your fucking red special two!
She has no soul. She will now live in between Briton and Europe and will have 4 body guards. I hope she try’s to attack her self, they can use her legs to bet the crap out of her.
How ever, in very recent news, it turns out she has not won the deal and that it is still (http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,23237660-663,00.html ) being postponed.
She needs a good baseball bat swung to the head.
[/QUOTE]
So she got the gold. What's it to Paul McCartney? Now he's got more money than he could possibly spend in 500 000 years instead of more money than he could possibly spend in 1 000 000 years. Do you think that he will lose sleep over the cash? Do you think that the woman will be any happier? I say, if anything, she'll be greedier still.
Continuing from where I left last night...
My next point concerns your insistance that this is a personal forum in which you ought to be able to discuss anything you like. Of course you can but at the same time you need to appreciate the fact that other folk are just as entitled to post a reply. That's the very point of a discussion board. To post an opinion and have other people contribute their views on that opinion. Otherwise this would be a statement board and cunts like Treasure Moment would have a post count in the billions.
My second point is actually an apology. I did use the phrase "Grow up young man" and it was a horribly patronising thing to say. I'm sorry and I take it back.
My third and final point was going to be on the subject of the PM/HM divorce itself but it looks as though we will have to put all this other bullshit to bed before we get to that bit.
Hows about this then? I'll keep the sarcasm down, you stop making threats of violence towards old Mrs Stumpy and we'll have a proper discussion on the subject. Then just as it starts to get interesting, Treasure Moment can enlighten us all by revealing that the divorce is just a goverment conspiracy to draw attention away from alien lizard babies who want to steal our brains.
Peace & Love
fatty.
My next point concerns your insistance that this is a personal forum in which you ought to be able to discuss anything you like. Of course you can but at the same time you need to appreciate the fact that other folk are just as entitled to post a reply. That's the very point of a discussion board. To post an opinion and have other people contribute their views on that opinion. Otherwise this would be a statement board and cunts like Treasure Moment would have a post count in the billions.
My second point is actually an apology. I did use the phrase "Grow up young man" and it was a horribly patronising thing to say. I'm sorry and I take it back.
My third and final point was going to be on the subject of the PM/HM divorce itself but it looks as though we will have to put all this other bullshit to bed before we get to that bit.
Hows about this then? I'll keep the sarcasm down, you stop making threats of violence towards old Mrs Stumpy and we'll have a proper discussion on the subject. Then just as it starts to get interesting, Treasure Moment can enlighten us all by revealing that the divorce is just a goverment conspiracy to draw attention away from alien lizard babies who want to steal our brains.
Peace & Love
fatty.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]...ASSDUDE.... wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Fatty, I could fill this reply with witty come backs, I could point this finger, I could add a world a sarcasm and be on the same level as other who just want a mind game head fuck[/QUOTE]
Assdude, I'm really sorry to have to be the one to break it to you, but: no, you couldn't.
Assdude, I'm really sorry to have to be the one to break it to you, but: no, you couldn't.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]...ASSDUDE.... wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]fatty wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Assdude,
So you don't think that you're the peron who needs to calm down, do you? Well let's take another look at your original post. In the first paragraph you called Heather Mills a gold digging scum sucking hoe, a drama queen who lives in her own world and a used up XXX slut. The remainder of your post nothing more than a list of fantasy scenarios involving extreme violence. You wanted to burn her legs in a fireplace, use her legs to build a guitar, have her four body gaurds beat the crap out of her and finally batter her head in with a baseball bat. If that's you when you're calm then I'd hate to be around you when you were feeling a bit tetchy.
You go on to accuse me of missing your point. As I read it, the point of your original post was that the settlement in the divorce of two people you don't even know had enraged you to the point where you felt that battering a woman to death was a reasonable course of action. If this was not indeed the case then I cheerfully retract everything I said earlier.
There are at least three other points you have raised that I'm keen to address but I'm an old man and I'm up way past my bedtime so I'll deal with them tomorrow.
fatty.
[/QUOTE]
Oh Fatty,
Its heading towards a tit for tat argument.
I bid you a good night old Sir.
Sleep tight this very evening and rise with shine tomorrow.
A.dude. [/QUOTE]
Wait...is that an admission of loss I read?
So you don't think that you're the peron who needs to calm down, do you? Well let's take another look at your original post. In the first paragraph you called Heather Mills a gold digging scum sucking hoe, a drama queen who lives in her own world and a used up XXX slut. The remainder of your post nothing more than a list of fantasy scenarios involving extreme violence. You wanted to burn her legs in a fireplace, use her legs to build a guitar, have her four body gaurds beat the crap out of her and finally batter her head in with a baseball bat. If that's you when you're calm then I'd hate to be around you when you were feeling a bit tetchy.
You go on to accuse me of missing your point. As I read it, the point of your original post was that the settlement in the divorce of two people you don't even know had enraged you to the point where you felt that battering a woman to death was a reasonable course of action. If this was not indeed the case then I cheerfully retract everything I said earlier.
There are at least three other points you have raised that I'm keen to address but I'm an old man and I'm up way past my bedtime so I'll deal with them tomorrow.
fatty.
[/QUOTE]
Oh Fatty,
Its heading towards a tit for tat argument.
I bid you a good night old Sir.
Sleep tight this very evening and rise with shine tomorrow.
A.dude. [/QUOTE]
Wait...is that an admission of loss I read?
I never really understood the logic behind one's entitlement to her (or his, if that ever happens) spouse's wealth after a divorce. You should come out of the divorce with exactly what you had when you went into the marriage. What you acquire during the marriage belongs to you, and what your spouse acquires during the marriage belongs to him or her. Can anyone explain to me how that does not make perfect sense?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=666600><b>Music Man wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I never really understood the logic behind one's entitlement to her (or his, if that ever happens) spouse's wealth after a divorce. You should come out of the divorce with exactly what you had when you went into the marriage. What you acquire during the marriage belongs to you, and what your spouse acquires during the marriage belongs to him or her. Can anyone explain to me how that does not make perfect sense? [/QUOTE]
It basically makes sense, but there is now a child involved. They don't want Mommy living with her in "squalor" while Daddy lives with her in the lap of luxury. Also the length of the marriage is considered. Twenty years opposed to four years - the monetary split will be figured accordingly... or so I believe...
As far as what each acquires during the marriage being separate... in the case where one spouse works outside the home and the other tends the children and house, the one who is home does not generate income for the family or for his/herself. They would wind up with nothing. That person's contribution was separate but equal, so monetary settlements must consider that. The stay-at-home spouse might have to still stay at home to care for very young children, or will need income until a proper job can be secured. And securing a proper job can take quite some time, depending on how long that individual was at home and thus out of the job market.
It basically makes sense, but there is now a child involved. They don't want Mommy living with her in "squalor" while Daddy lives with her in the lap of luxury. Also the length of the marriage is considered. Twenty years opposed to four years - the monetary split will be figured accordingly... or so I believe...
As far as what each acquires during the marriage being separate... in the case where one spouse works outside the home and the other tends the children and house, the one who is home does not generate income for the family or for his/herself. They would wind up with nothing. That person's contribution was separate but equal, so monetary settlements must consider that. The stay-at-home spouse might have to still stay at home to care for very young children, or will need income until a proper job can be secured. And securing a proper job can take quite some time, depending on how long that individual was at home and thus out of the job market.
I understand that much, and that certain cases can become tricky at times. What I don't understand is, in cases where a person marries into wealth, how the married person somehow is entitled to any of that wealth. Upon divorce, they should merely be compensated for tending to the children and the house, and perhaps minimally sustained until they can secure a job (and I stress "minimally").
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=666600><b>Music Man wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I never really understood the logic behind one's entitlement to her (or his, if that ever happens) spouse's wealth after a divorce.[/QUOTE]
I read somewhere she claims to have co-written "Yesterday"... in this case, 50 millions would make sense to me.
I read somewhere she claims to have co-written "Yesterday"... in this case, 50 millions would make sense to me.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]...ASSDUDE.... wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Fatty, I could fill this reply with witty come backs, I could point this finger, I could add a world a sarcasm and be on the same level as other who just want a mind game head fuck[/QUOTE]
Assdude, I'm really sorry to have to be the one to break it to you, but: no, you couldn't.[/QUOTE]
Oh shit... dam it... I was hoping I could, thanks for informing me coz your opinions mean a shit load of fuck. sorry buddy, you dont know what your talking about.
Assdude, I'm really sorry to have to be the one to break it to you, but: no, you couldn't.[/QUOTE]
Oh shit... dam it... I was hoping I could, thanks for informing me coz your opinions mean a shit load of fuck. sorry buddy, you dont know what your talking about.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]...ASSDUDE.... wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]fatty wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Assdude,
So you don't think that you're the peron who needs to calm down, do you? Well let's take another look at your original post. In the first paragraph you called Heather Mills a gold digging scum sucking hoe, a drama queen who lives in her own world and a used up XXX slut. The remainder of your post nothing more than a list of fantasy scenarios involving extreme violence. You wanted to burn her legs in a fireplace, use her legs to build a guitar, have her four body gaurds beat the crap out of her and finally batter her head in with a baseball bat. If that's you when you're calm then I'd hate to be around you when you were feeling a bit tetchy.
You go on to accuse me of missing your point. As I read it, the point of your original post was that the settlement in the divorce of two people you don't even know had enraged you to the point where you felt that battering a woman to death was a reasonable course of action. If this was not indeed the case then I cheerfully retract everything I said earlier.
There are at least three other points you have raised that I'm keen to address but I'm an old man and I'm up way past my bedtime so I'll deal with them tomorrow.
fatty.
[/QUOTE]
Oh Fatty,
Its heading towards a tit for tat argument.
I bid you a good night old Sir.
Sleep tight this very evening and rise with shine tomorrow.
A.dude. [/QUOTE]
Wait...is that an admission of loss I read?[/QUOTE]
glad to know your Chromosome's have gelled in perfectly.
So you don't think that you're the peron who needs to calm down, do you? Well let's take another look at your original post. In the first paragraph you called Heather Mills a gold digging scum sucking hoe, a drama queen who lives in her own world and a used up XXX slut. The remainder of your post nothing more than a list of fantasy scenarios involving extreme violence. You wanted to burn her legs in a fireplace, use her legs to build a guitar, have her four body gaurds beat the crap out of her and finally batter her head in with a baseball bat. If that's you when you're calm then I'd hate to be around you when you were feeling a bit tetchy.
You go on to accuse me of missing your point. As I read it, the point of your original post was that the settlement in the divorce of two people you don't even know had enraged you to the point where you felt that battering a woman to death was a reasonable course of action. If this was not indeed the case then I cheerfully retract everything I said earlier.
There are at least three other points you have raised that I'm keen to address but I'm an old man and I'm up way past my bedtime so I'll deal with them tomorrow.
fatty.
[/QUOTE]
Oh Fatty,
Its heading towards a tit for tat argument.
I bid you a good night old Sir.
Sleep tight this very evening and rise with shine tomorrow.
A.dude. [/QUOTE]
Wait...is that an admission of loss I read?[/QUOTE]
glad to know your Chromosome's have gelled in perfectly.
Ive never seen fatty so active on here!
And what about that fookin rats milk?!
And what about that fookin rats milk?!
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]...ASSDUDE.... wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]...ASSDUDE.... wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Fatty, I could fill this reply with witty come backs, I could point this finger, I could add a world a sarcasm and be on the same level as other who just want a mind game head fuck[/QUOTE]
Assdude, I'm really sorry to have to be the one to break it to you, but: no, you couldn't.[/QUOTE]
Oh shit... dam it... I was hoping I could, thanks for informing me coz your opinions mean a shit load of fuck. sorry buddy, you dont know what your talking about. [/QUOTE]
Ha-ha
To the mice inside your head : PEDAL FASTER, GUYS.
Assdude, I'm really sorry to have to be the one to break it to you, but: no, you couldn't.[/QUOTE]
Oh shit... dam it... I was hoping I could, thanks for informing me coz your opinions mean a shit load of fuck. sorry buddy, you dont know what your talking about. [/QUOTE]
Ha-ha
To the mice inside your head : PEDAL FASTER, GUYS.