How would ALL Queen fans feel if instead of Paul,Brian and Roger teamed up with Tim Staffel.For those of you who are against Paul,would that make you feel any better.Or is it just the use of the word QUEEN that irks you.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
I'm not against Paul, I think he's great. What bothers me is the use of the 'Queen' name.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Sebastian wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I'm not against Paul, I think he's great. What bothers me is the use of the 'Queen' name.[/QUOTE]
I agree, i think that Paul is an excellent singer, but going under the name 'Queen' (+ Paul Rodgers or whatever) isnt right, as Brian and Roger are only part of Queen.
Sorry, im feeling a bit sick a the moment, my head isnt that clear.
I agree, i think that Paul is an excellent singer, but going under the name 'Queen' (+ Paul Rodgers or whatever) isnt right, as Brian and Roger are only part of Queen.
Sorry, im feeling a bit sick a the moment, my head isnt that clear.
Paul has nothing to do with Queen. Not even Tim. Queen is because of Freddie, Brian, Roger and John. Just a few bands could be considered almost the same, such as ACDC.
no matter who sings we all know who Queen is....
Does anybody think that Brian and Roger may be calling themselves Queen with the blessing of the other two.
Sensible answers now.What would you rather they called themselves,if not Queen?
Sensible answers now.What would you rather they called themselves,if not Queen?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Roger Meadows Tailor wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Does anybody think that Brian and Roger may be calling themselves Queen with the blessing of the other two.[/QUOTE]
No.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Roger Meadows Tailor wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
What would you rather they called themselves,if not Queen?[/QUOTE]
"Hotels near Glasgow"
No.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Roger Meadows Tailor wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
What would you rather they called themselves,if not Queen?[/QUOTE]
"Hotels near Glasgow"
Staffel, May and Taylor should team up once more.
I'd love to see them do Earth.
They did get on stage and played Earth in early 2000 or 2002 or sometime around then....I thought it was shite....Maybe I was expecting the vox harms to be nicer sounding but they were too 'pub-sing-a-long-ish (Yes, I did make the word up....)
hey, I'm getting the hang of this now...;)
hey, I'm getting the hang of this now...;)
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Blackvy wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Paul has nothing to do with Queen. Not even Tim. Queen is because of Freddie, Brian, Roger and John. Just a few bands could be considered almost the same, such as ACDC.[/QUOTE]
Not sure that's the greatest example to use...
2 different bass players, 3 different drummers & 3 different different lead singers, plus I'm sure the rhythm guitarist left for a short period too.
Not sure that's the greatest example to use...
2 different bass players, 3 different drummers & 3 different different lead singers, plus I'm sure the rhythm guitarist left for a short period too.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]ludwigs wrote: [/QUOTENAME]They did get on stage and played Earth in early 2000 or 2002 or sometime around then....I thought it was shite....Maybe I was expecting the vox harms to be nicer sounding but they were too 'pub-sing-a-long-ish (Yes, I did make the word up....)
hey, I'm getting the hang of this now...;) [/QUOTE]
They did it in 1992
http://www.queenconcerts.com/detail/live/1103/22.12.1992+-+Guest+appearance:+The+Cross+++Brian+May+in+The+Marquee+Club,+London,+UK+(Xmas+party+with+special+guests)/
hey, I'm getting the hang of this now...;) [/QUOTE]
They did it in 1992
http://www.queenconcerts.com/detail/live/1103/22.12.1992+-+Guest+appearance:+The+Cross+++Brian+May+in+The+Marquee+Club,+London,+UK+(Xmas+party+with+special+guests)/
Ever heard of "The Show Must Go On"? How's that for approval to go on?
Thanks for the correction. I knew they did but couldn't recall exactly when....
first of all. Freddie already told them to continue and john gave them blessing for all the stuff they're making atm. so what's the fuzz?