Um bohemian rhapsody strange title yes but is it a great song? i rest my case if you understand,IF AND IT'S A BIG IF it's called the cosmos rocks then great it'S what inside that counts.
But saying that i had a thought that if brian may said to the public " guys and gals here's a competition to name the new album and the winner will get free tickets, backstage access etc... i'm sure that would be great.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Gr8 King Rat wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I'm still not convinced that that will be the name of the new album. Terrible if it is though...[/QUOTE]
"Surely the name of the live album isn't Rock Montreal?"
"That cover must be a mock-up that Play.com made?"
"Say It's Not True can't be any indication of how the new album sounds like."
I have a news flash for anybody who hasn't been following around the Queen world this millennium:
For one reason or another their creative output has regressed to the level of a 16-year old Dutch bootlegger (no offence to the Dutch). The titles are cliched, the artwork is horrible, and the music is amateurish to say the least.
Prepare to be rocked indeed!
"Surely the name of the live album isn't Rock Montreal?"
"That cover must be a mock-up that Play.com made?"
"Say It's Not True can't be any indication of how the new album sounds like."
I have a news flash for anybody who hasn't been following around the Queen world this millennium:
For one reason or another their creative output has regressed to the level of a 16-year old Dutch bootlegger (no offence to the Dutch). The titles are cliched, the artwork is horrible, and the music is amateurish to say the least.
Prepare to be rocked indeed!
Being objetive about it, the title is meaningless.
I don't actually think it matters that much but a bit more imagination would have been nice.
Let's hope they change it!
Remember Freddie's solo album was going to be called 'Made in Heaven' until weeks before production - nothing's set in stone yet....
I don't actually think it matters that much but a bit more imagination would have been nice.
Let's hope they change it!
Remember Freddie's solo album was going to be called 'Made in Heaven' until weeks before production - nothing's set in stone yet....
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Serry... wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
I like QZ for such arguments like "shut up", "fuck off", "get over it", "you moron" etc. it brings some stability in our discussions, some kind of firmness that you're right...[/QUOTE]
You forgot "FACT"
I like QZ for such arguments like "shut up", "fuck off", "get over it", "you moron" etc. it brings some stability in our discussions, some kind of firmness that you're right...[/QUOTE]
You forgot "FACT"
As for the topic itself; there's probably a dozen 'better' titles that could be given to the new album, but I'd rather have something that wasn't guessed on Queenzone. It'd ruin the surprise.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Russian Headlong wrote: [/QUOTENAME]What the fuck are you on about. It's no worse than the Miracle or Hot Space. Who gives a shit what it's called. For all those fans still bitching 'oh it's not Queen without freddie' shut up you snobs. We know it's not the original line up but neither was Zeppelin last December, The Who are just Daltrey and Townsend now, Thin Lizzy do not have Phil Lynott and they recently toured. Get over it, don't be such snobs plenty of bands still have much to offer even if they no longer have their classic line ups, Queen in 2008 are not he same but why shouldn't half the original band still play the music, what is the alternative, tribute bands![/QUOTE]
Great post. But don't even bother trying to reason with "Treasure Moment" or his two friends here. He's a broken record, brick wall, and a(n often robotic) closed mind all in one. Look... watch what will happen when he replies:
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Treasure Moment wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Exactly, all they are doing now is ruining the incredible legacy as the greatest band on earth EVER.[/QUOTE]
Says who? You? The future can't change the past, so nothing will happen to your precious "legacy" that seems to validate your entire experience. As for your "greatest band" claim, even Queen themselves (and just about every other rational person in the world) accepts that if there is one group of entertainers who hold the torch for all others in their field to follow, it's The Beatles.
[/QUOTE]
Dont make me laugh, the beatles is NOWEHRE near Queens level. Its like comparing an amateur shit band with Queen. The beatles is just hype, not actual good musicians. Queen is on a another level, like 1 million times better in every aspect.
Great post. But don't even bother trying to reason with "Treasure Moment" or his two friends here. He's a broken record, brick wall, and a(n often robotic) closed mind all in one. Look... watch what will happen when he replies:
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Treasure Moment wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Exactly, all they are doing now is ruining the incredible legacy as the greatest band on earth EVER.[/QUOTE]
Says who? You? The future can't change the past, so nothing will happen to your precious "legacy" that seems to validate your entire experience. As for your "greatest band" claim, even Queen themselves (and just about every other rational person in the world) accepts that if there is one group of entertainers who hold the torch for all others in their field to follow, it's The Beatles.
[/QUOTE]
Dont make me laugh, the beatles is NOWEHRE near Queens level. Its like comparing an amateur shit band with Queen. The beatles is just hype, not actual good musicians. Queen is on a another level, like 1 million times better in every aspect.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Russian Headlong wrote: [/QUOTENAME]What the fuck are you on about. It's no worse than the Miracle or Hot Space. Who gives a shit what it's called. For all those fans still bitching 'oh it's not Queen without freddie' shut up you snobs. We know it's not the original line up but neither was Zeppelin last December, The Who are just Daltrey and Townsend now, Thin Lizzy do not have Phil Lynott and they recently toured. Get over it, don't be such snobs plenty of bands still have much to offer even if they no longer have their classic line ups, Queen in 2008 are not he same but why shouldn't half the original band still play the music, what is the alternative, tribute bands![/QUOTE]
Nobody is saying they shouldn't tour, its the fact that they are called Queen that people dont like.
Nobody is saying they shouldn't tour, its the fact that they are called Queen that people dont like.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]masterstroke_84 wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Brian May is Queen.
The name of the album? it´s just a name... like someone else said: what about "the miracle", "hot space"... even "the game".... or the worst of all "Mr Bad Guy" hahaha..
.[/QUOTE]
Well this is overrated, too, I guess!!! Though Brian May is the most successful of Queen, I would say. As the band, best was just when they were all together.
Yeah found bit funny "Mr Bad Guy" title, too.. Though Freddie was really a bad guy.
Yeah but let's remember the band name itself, it's actually really freaky.. QUEEN. It's like, calling the rock band "belladonna".
XD
But now after all they've done, "Queen" name sounds sooooo sooo.. serious, important and majestic.
And by the way, I like the new album title:]
The name of the album? it´s just a name... like someone else said: what about "the miracle", "hot space"... even "the game".... or the worst of all "Mr Bad Guy" hahaha..
.[/QUOTE]
Well this is overrated, too, I guess!!! Though Brian May is the most successful of Queen, I would say. As the band, best was just when they were all together.
Yeah found bit funny "Mr Bad Guy" title, too.. Though Freddie was really a bad guy.
Yeah but let's remember the band name itself, it's actually really freaky.. QUEEN. It's like, calling the rock band "belladonna".
XD
But now after all they've done, "Queen" name sounds sooooo sooo.. serious, important and majestic.
And by the way, I like the new album title:]
Are you for real beatles a amateur shit band? the beatles were queen's template for f***s sake in every aspect, chord changes in songs in terms of writing etc.. .
The beatles are my far the greatest band in anyone's eyes musicians included you obviously haven't listened to all the beatles music in depth TRY IT you will be shocked.
The beatles are my far the greatest band in anyone's eyes musicians included you obviously haven't listened to all the beatles music in depth TRY IT you will be shocked.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Barbie Jupiter wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]masterstroke_84 wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Brian May is Queen.
The name of the album? it´s just a name... like someone else said: what about "the miracle", "hot space"... even "the game".... or the worst of all "Mr Bad Guy" hahaha..
.[/QUOTE]
Well this is overrated, too, I guess!!! Though Brian May is the most successful of Queen, I would say. As the band, best was just when they were all together.
Yeah found bit funny "Mr Bad Guy" title, too.. Though Freddie was really a bad guy.
Yeah but let's remember the band name itself, it's actually really freaky.. QUEEN. It's like, calling the rock band "belladonna".
XD
But now after all they've done, "Queen" name sounds sooooo sooo.. serious, important and majestic.
And by the way, I like the new album title:][/QUOTE]
Brian wasnt even close to be the most succesful member of Queen because without freddie they would NEVER get this huge. Freddie is main reason they are the biggest band in the world.
The name of the album? it´s just a name... like someone else said: what about "the miracle", "hot space"... even "the game".... or the worst of all "Mr Bad Guy" hahaha..
.[/QUOTE]
Well this is overrated, too, I guess!!! Though Brian May is the most successful of Queen, I would say. As the band, best was just when they were all together.
Yeah found bit funny "Mr Bad Guy" title, too.. Though Freddie was really a bad guy.
Yeah but let's remember the band name itself, it's actually really freaky.. QUEEN. It's like, calling the rock band "belladonna".
XD
But now after all they've done, "Queen" name sounds sooooo sooo.. serious, important and majestic.
And by the way, I like the new album title:][/QUOTE]
Brian wasnt even close to be the most succesful member of Queen because without freddie they would NEVER get this huge. Freddie is main reason they are the biggest band in the world.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]DAVIDBRENDAM wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
Are you for real beatles a amateur shit band? the beatles were queen's template for f***s sake in every aspect, chord changes in songs in terms of writing etc.. .
The beatles are my far the greatest band in anyone's eyes musicians included you obviously haven't listened to all the beatles music in depth TRY IT you will be shocked.[/QUOTE]
I listened to 25 beatles songs and they almost put me into sleep. VERY amateurish and simple songwriting and most of the songs sounded the same and the singers arent anything to brag about either. Totally overhyped band and nowhere near Queen.
Are you for real beatles a amateur shit band? the beatles were queen's template for f***s sake in every aspect, chord changes in songs in terms of writing etc.. .
The beatles are my far the greatest band in anyone's eyes musicians included you obviously haven't listened to all the beatles music in depth TRY IT you will be shocked.[/QUOTE]
I listened to 25 beatles songs and they almost put me into sleep. VERY amateurish and simple songwriting and most of the songs sounded the same and the singers arent anything to brag about either. Totally overhyped band and nowhere near Queen.
I kinda have a hate/love relationship with queen for the last couple of years.
Styling/design/(product) presentation is dreadfull for the last 15 years or so. I really don't like that side of the group anymore. Brian May has no taste in my honest opninion.
BUT i really really really LOVE the fact they are touring again and even making a new studio album with Paul Rodgers. Kitsch or not, i buy it anyway.
Dreadfull stage presentation or not, I'm gonna see them anyway. I just love queen.
Styling/design/(product) presentation is dreadfull for the last 15 years or so. I really don't like that side of the group anymore. Brian May has no taste in my honest opninion.
BUT i really really really LOVE the fact they are touring again and even making a new studio album with Paul Rodgers. Kitsch or not, i buy it anyway.
Dreadfull stage presentation or not, I'm gonna see them anyway. I just love queen.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Tero wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Gr8 King Rat wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I'm still not convinced that that will be the name of the new album. Terrible if it is though...[/QUOTE]
"Surely the name of the live album isn't Rock Montreal?"
"That cover must be a mock-up that Play.com made?"
"Say It's Not True can't be any indication of how the new album sounds like."
I have a news flash for anybody who hasn't been following around the Queen world this millennium:
For one reason or another their creative output has regressed to the level of a 16-year old Dutch bootlegger (no offence to the Dutch). The titles are cliched, the artwork is horrible, and the music is amateurish to say the least.
Prepare to be rocked indeed![/QUOTE]
Oh God...you have a point. Crap...
"Surely the name of the live album isn't Rock Montreal?"
"That cover must be a mock-up that Play.com made?"
"Say It's Not True can't be any indication of how the new album sounds like."
I have a news flash for anybody who hasn't been following around the Queen world this millennium:
For one reason or another their creative output has regressed to the level of a 16-year old Dutch bootlegger (no offence to the Dutch). The titles are cliched, the artwork is horrible, and the music is amateurish to say the least.
Prepare to be rocked indeed![/QUOTE]
Oh God...you have a point. Crap...
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Treasure Moment wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]DAVIDBRENDAM wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
Are you for real beatles a amateur shit band? the beatles were queen's template for f***s sake in every aspect, chord changes in songs in terms of writing etc.. .
The beatles are my far the greatest band in anyone's eyes musicians included you obviously haven't listened to all the beatles music in depth TRY IT you will be shocked.[/QUOTE]
I listened to 25 beatles songs and they almost put me into sleep. VERY amateurish and simple songwriting and most of the songs sounded the same and the singers arent anything to brag about either. Totally overhyped band and nowhere near Queen.[/QUOTE]
No Beatles means no Zeppelin and Floyd, no Zeppelin, Floyd, and Beatles mean No Queen, therefore everytime you talk smack about the roots, the bands that inspired queen's early albums, you are insulting Freddie. You, you are not a fan, you are a menace to the true fans and you need to find some other music to obsess over, don't you dare ever claim yourself as a fan again. Why don't you open your fucking mind before you try to understand The Beatles.
Are you for real beatles a amateur shit band? the beatles were queen's template for f***s sake in every aspect, chord changes in songs in terms of writing etc.. .
The beatles are my far the greatest band in anyone's eyes musicians included you obviously haven't listened to all the beatles music in depth TRY IT you will be shocked.[/QUOTE]
I listened to 25 beatles songs and they almost put me into sleep. VERY amateurish and simple songwriting and most of the songs sounded the same and the singers arent anything to brag about either. Totally overhyped band and nowhere near Queen.[/QUOTE]
No Beatles means no Zeppelin and Floyd, no Zeppelin, Floyd, and Beatles mean No Queen, therefore everytime you talk smack about the roots, the bands that inspired queen's early albums, you are insulting Freddie. You, you are not a fan, you are a menace to the true fans and you need to find some other music to obsess over, don't you dare ever claim yourself as a fan again. Why don't you open your fucking mind before you try to understand The Beatles.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Treasure Moment wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Russian Headlong wrote: [/QUOTENAME]What the fuck are you on about. It's no worse than the Miracle or Hot Space. Who gives a shit what it's called. For all those fans still bitching 'oh it's not Queen without freddie' shut up you snobs. We know it's not the original line up but neither was Zeppelin last December, The Who are just Daltrey and Townsend now, Thin Lizzy do not have Phil Lynott and they recently toured. Get over it, don't be such snobs plenty of bands still have much to offer even if they no longer have their classic line ups, Queen in 2008 are not he same but why shouldn't half the original band still play the music, what is the alternative, tribute bands![/QUOTE]
Great post. But don't even bother trying to reason with "Treasure Moment" or his two friends here. He's a broken record, brick wall, and a(n often robotic) closed mind all in one. Look... watch what will happen when he replies:
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Treasure Moment wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Exactly, all they are doing now is ruining the incredible legacy as the greatest band on earth EVER.[/QUOTE]
Says who? You? The future can't change the past, so nothing will happen to your precious "legacy" that seems to validate your entire experience. As for your "greatest band" claim, even Queen themselves (and just about every other rational person in the world) accepts that if there is one group of entertainers who hold the torch for all others in their field to follow, it's The Beatles.
[/QUOTE]
Dont make me laugh, the beatles is NOWEHRE near Queens level. Its like comparing an amateur shit band with Queen. The beatles is just hype, not actual good musicians. Queen is on a another level, like 1 million times better in every aspect.[/QUOTE]
Ha, though Queen is my favorite band, the Beatles were the masters of music. Their progress and quality of music is unsurpassed! The Beatles were pure art. The best at what they did and the most popular! Never ever seen again since!
Great post. But don't even bother trying to reason with "Treasure Moment" or his two friends here. He's a broken record, brick wall, and a(n often robotic) closed mind all in one. Look... watch what will happen when he replies:
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Treasure Moment wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Exactly, all they are doing now is ruining the incredible legacy as the greatest band on earth EVER.[/QUOTE]
Says who? You? The future can't change the past, so nothing will happen to your precious "legacy" that seems to validate your entire experience. As for your "greatest band" claim, even Queen themselves (and just about every other rational person in the world) accepts that if there is one group of entertainers who hold the torch for all others in their field to follow, it's The Beatles.
[/QUOTE]
Dont make me laugh, the beatles is NOWEHRE near Queens level. Its like comparing an amateur shit band with Queen. The beatles is just hype, not actual good musicians. Queen is on a another level, like 1 million times better in every aspect.[/QUOTE]
Ha, though Queen is my favorite band, the Beatles were the masters of music. Their progress and quality of music is unsurpassed! The Beatles were pure art. The best at what they did and the most popular! Never ever seen again since!