Al Murray + Queen....

Well to put in context watch this clip of Queen performance on Al Murray's show last year.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zjbaYNrjOvY

I for one cant wait - should be a good laugh :)

I spose this'd be a bad moment for me to say I don't like the Musical.... :P

Nah really, that clip isn't so bad. If it's like that tomorrow, then okay I guess... it still seems silly as hell to me but fuck it. I just want to hear new music. !

Does anybody have the video from their appearance on Al Murray from Friday?

"I just want to hear new music. !"

Glad to hear it. I can't wait to hear the new music either. Roll on evening :)

Brian says on his website They are debuting a new song and more...

What could that mean? new backing band? new cloggs? new line in limited edition Freddie muggs. New Queen archivist....

We wait and wonder it tonight...

John Deacon!

Live Outside UK? No TV? zatto.com features a streaming TV player (as a download) which offers ITV1 (free)although ITV1 is unavailable from some contries (ie: France, I can confirm it works fine for Swiss viewers)

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Togg wrote: [/QUOTENAME] New Queen archivist....[/QUOTE]

Hey now there's an idea. I guess it would be cheaper to just get a new one than to give the present one what he really needs, which is one of those expensive personality transplants the Germans have been working on.

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Zebonka12 wrote: [/QUOTENAME]John Deacon![/QUOTE]

Rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrroger TAYlor!

I thought it was OK. Certainly not old-school Queen, but it makes me anticipate the new album. I'm still hoping from some Roger or Brian vocals...

Hum... quite a catchy chorus. but someone should forbid roger to use his phaser-vocals (reminds me to his 80s solo stuff). quite a simple song though. a bit boring and missing john's appearance so much (the bass definetly does not rock (who the hell played it ?)!)!
seems to be a rodgers/taylor written song as brian's influence seems to be one lousy simple (!) guitar riff.
will be fortunate to hear an album release, as 'say it aint true' was a killer for the studio version and also sucked live... :-)

i think publishing the song this early (album in half a year!) is a good marketing trick, as i can imagine the chorus to be used by any tv-boulevard-magazine around the world for the catchy chorus (for reports on broken celebrities like mme.spears etc.).
imo.: $$$ and (good?) publicity for q+pr.

Enjoyed the showm just seen it, not bad at all - but I think Nickelback got there first with a better song in a similar sort of vein.

It was better then I hoped, this is indeed the combination in which the vocals of Paul Rodgers fit into the music that sounds like Queen. To be honest I'm not impressed bij the Roger parts indeed the phased vocals are misplaced and the lyrics(....see...TV see C-lebrity) hmmmmmmmm. I liked the solo part of Brian and surely liked the end. It made me curious about the new album that for sure