The M.E.N. Arena is without a doubt the best Arena in the UK...... any Arena (the O2) that warns customers not to book certain tickets if they are scared of heights must be shite!!!!
The M.E.N. would sell out, as would the Hallam and Metro Arenas.
Any way, back to my previous point, which website did this advice about new dates appear on, can't we be given details of the site or is it some sort of top secret website????
Thread
Posts in chronological order
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]andyhwood485 wrote: [/QUOTENAME]can't we be given details of the site or is it some sort of top secret website????[/QUOTE]... I for one believe it is in our collective interest to protect that particular source from consequences of that inadvertent slip ...
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]gnomo wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]andyhwood485 wrote: [/QUOTENAME]can't we be given details of the site or is it some sort of top secret website????[/QUOTE]... I for one believe it is in our collective interest to protect that particular source from consequences of that inadvertent slip ...[/QUOTE]
Agreed.
Agreed.
absolute load of rubbish
thre are NO further UK dates !
Somebody has started a rumour just for the hell
of it
Peroid.
thre are NO further UK dates !
Somebody has started a rumour just for the hell
of it
Peroid.
... uh-uh ...
I called Jackie at Queen Fan Club
She says its highly unlikely that there will be further UK dates announced and that I shouldn't believe what I hear on the web.
She says its highly unlikely that there will be further UK dates announced and that I shouldn't believe what I hear on the web.
i come from near newcastle and i missed out on tickets for me and my dad to see the 2005 pr and queen tour, and 1989 freddie was to ill to tour and 1986 i was to young to go, i swaer if they doan extra date at newcastle and i can get tickets for me and my dad it will be one of the best days of my life. has anyone heard any further news? have a great day
I have possibly found the website which started the rumour-
http://queentour2005.wegotit.at/
How true the rumour is?.... well that remains to be seen.
http://queentour2005.wegotit.at/
How true the rumour is?.... well that remains to be seen.
Thats not the original source though, the source is someone in the know so id say these new dates are pretty reliable ;)
MT Queenie....how do you know it isn't the source, and if it isn't, who the hell is the source?????..... why the big secret????
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]andyhwood485 wrote: [/QUOTENAME]MT Queenie....how do you know it isn't the source, and if it isn't, who the hell is the source?????..... why the big secret????[/QUOTE]... let's take a look at this *completely hypothetical* scenario:
you know someone personally, who at some point shares with you something that, at that point, is still someone else's private information, although scheduled to be made public shortly; but then - oops! - the public announcement gets postponed at the last moment, and your source has to quickly backtrack and cover up.
How happy do you think the owner of the info would be with your source, and your source with you, if you went around naming your source as the source of the info leak?
you know someone personally, who at some point shares with you something that, at that point, is still someone else's private information, although scheduled to be made public shortly; but then - oops! - the public announcement gets postponed at the last moment, and your source has to quickly backtrack and cover up.
How happy do you think the owner of the info would be with your source, and your source with you, if you went around naming your source as the source of the info leak?
Rubbish
Rubbish
RUBBISH
Rubbish
RUBBISH
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]gnomo wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]andyhwood485 wrote: [/QUOTENAME]MT Queenie....how do you know it isn't the source, and if it isn't, who the hell is the source?????..... why the big secret????[/QUOTE]... let's take a look at this *completely hypothetical* scenario:
you know someone personally, who at some point shares with you something that, at that point, is still someone else's private information, although scheduled to be made public shortly; but then - oops! - the public announcement gets postponed at the last moment, and your source has to quickly backtrack and cover up.
How happy do you think the owner of the info would be with your source, and your source with you, if you went around naming your source as the source of the info leak?[/QUOTE]
Well said, it has been said numerous times that none of those who know who the real source is will be naming that person, cos if we did that what would be the chance of that person ever leaking something like this again
you know someone personally, who at some point shares with you something that, at that point, is still someone else's private information, although scheduled to be made public shortly; but then - oops! - the public announcement gets postponed at the last moment, and your source has to quickly backtrack and cover up.
How happy do you think the owner of the info would be with your source, and your source with you, if you went around naming your source as the source of the info leak?[/QUOTE]
Well said, it has been said numerous times that none of those who know who the real source is will be naming that person, cos if we did that what would be the chance of that person ever leaking something like this again
Well if this person exists, they deserve to be outed....... if the information was thought to be reliable, whoever passed it on, brought the information into the public domain, presumably expecting some sort of hero worship for themselves..... they dont need protecting!
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]andyhwood485 wrote: [/QUOTENAME] presumably expecting some sort of hero worship for themselves..... they dont need protecting![/QUOTE]*HA!* about don't need protecting: you seem to have no idea how much anyone DO need protecting, if they ever happen to cross QPL's path...
I leave to the source's closer friends the *HA!* about hero worship...
I leave to the source's closer friends the *HA!* about hero worship...