I really don't see why they take we will rock you so offensively...fascist??? that is so laughable. Queen did experiment, hence HOT SPACE!!!!!!!!!!!!! Rolling stones blows and I would rather put a fucking ice pick in my eyes then read their pretentious, BORING, for-shit magazine.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Critics always hated Queen because they never represented whatever social movement was happening at the time.
They only represented themselves, played what they wanted to play, we're better than anyone else and didn't mind the rest of the world knowing about it... and dont we love them for it.
Honestly, these critics are just a sad pack of wankers who must absolutely detest the fact that despite their vile, Queen went on to dominate the World!
Remember, those who cant, critque.
They only represented themselves, played what they wanted to play, we're better than anyone else and didn't mind the rest of the world knowing about it... and dont we love them for it.
Honestly, these critics are just a sad pack of wankers who must absolutely detest the fact that despite their vile, Queen went on to dominate the World!
Remember, those who cant, critque.
Let's be honest though: the liner notes for Livekillers are exactly as stated in RS -- self-congratulatory, indulgent, gushing and sycophantic.
I was pleasantly surprised to read a positive review of Queen's first album but all the others are terrible.
It's almost as if RS fell in love with Queen's very early style and they felt betrayed by their later works, holding a grudge for ever.
Or maybe they fired the person that reviewed their first album...?
I find their reviews from the 80's somewhat accurate (surprisingly favorable for The Works) but they really lost the mark on the Innuendo one.
I think they still pose a good point (in a very bad manner). I believe that Queen tried so hard in making their songs as 'generic' as possible -to please everybody- that you almost don't believe Freddie when he sings them. Still, I wouldn't call them "soul-less".
Interesting reading, though.
It's almost as if RS fell in love with Queen's very early style and they felt betrayed by their later works, holding a grudge for ever.
Or maybe they fired the person that reviewed their first album...?
I find their reviews from the 80's somewhat accurate (surprisingly favorable for The Works) but they really lost the mark on the Innuendo one.
I think they still pose a good point (in a very bad manner). I believe that Queen tried so hard in making their songs as 'generic' as possible -to please everybody- that you almost don't believe Freddie when he sings them. Still, I wouldn't call them "soul-less".
Interesting reading, though.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]sheerheartattack1980 wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I really don't see why they take we will rock you so offensively...fascist??? that is so laughable. Queen did experiment, hence HOT SPACE!!!!!!!!!!!!! Rolling stones blows and I would rather put a fucking ice pick in my eyes then read their pretentious, BORING, for-shit magazine.[/QUOTE]
I agree, fuck that shitty garbage magazine, its written by a bunch of stupid garbage humans.
I agree, fuck that shitty garbage magazine, its written by a bunch of stupid garbage humans.
If I'd been shot four times and was bleeding to death and the only thing I could use to plug up some of the bullet holes was a Rolling Stones magazine, I'd rather bleed to death.
Fuck this stupid publication.
Fuck this stupid publication.