[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]QueenMercury46 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Treasure Moment wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Tero wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Treasure Moment wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Ducksoup wrote: [/QUOTENAME]U2, the biggest rock band in the world at the moment, doesn't need Queen + Paul Rodgers.
Queen + Paul Rodgers fill arenas. U2 fill stadiums.
[/QUOTE]
my band musically pisses all over U2 and thats a fact.[/QUOTE]
I can believe you're great in musical pissing (and your fantasies would probably involve golden showers), but do you have the talent or songwriting skills to beat any band?[/QUOTE]
Not any band but certainly U2, rolling stones, the beatles, coldplay and garbage like that, basically the mainstream crap. I would never say that we are musically more skilled than Queen for example becuase that would be a lie. Im not arrogant, im just saying the truth about things.[/QUOTE]
So what exactly makes your band so much better than U2? I'd like to know.[/QUOTE]
well, simply our songwriting and skills. They simply arent on the same level as us or Queen. Queen is about 1 million times better musicians than U2.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
While we're at it..
*Cough*MOZART*Cough*
*Cough*MOZART*Cough*
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Sergei? wrote: [/QUOTENAME]While we're at it..
*Cough*MOZART*Cough*[/QUOTE]
mozart has more skills although not all of his material is great.
*Cough*MOZART*Cough*[/QUOTE]
mozart has more skills although not all of his material is great.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Treasure Moment wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Sergei? wrote: [/QUOTENAME]While we're at it..
*Cough*MOZART*Cough*[/QUOTE]
mozart has more skills although not all of his material is great.[/QUOTE]
Material?
Alright. This is Mozart we're speaking of, not Treasure Moment. World famous, timeless musicians of the classical period do not have "Material". They have works. Pieces. Whatever the plural of "opus" is.
Mozart *has* more skills? I'm assuming then that he's still alive as well, most likely disc jockeying at some underground club?
*Cough*MOZART*Cough*[/QUOTE]
mozart has more skills although not all of his material is great.[/QUOTE]
Material?
Alright. This is Mozart we're speaking of, not Treasure Moment. World famous, timeless musicians of the classical period do not have "Material". They have works. Pieces. Whatever the plural of "opus" is.
Mozart *has* more skills? I'm assuming then that he's still alive as well, most likely disc jockeying at some underground club?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Sergei? wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Treasure Moment wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Sergei? wrote: [/QUOTENAME]While we're at it..
*Cough*MOZART*Cough*[/QUOTE]
mozart has more skills although not all of his material is great.[/QUOTE]
Material?
Alright. This is Mozart we're speaking of, not Treasure Moment. World famous, timeless musicians of the classical period do not have "Material". They have works. Pieces. Whatever the plural of "opus" is.
Mozart *has* more skills? I'm assuming then that he's still alive as well, most likely disc jockeying at some underground club? [/QUOTE]
works, pieces... they are all the same as for material. Mozart was great indeed but he cant beat freddie, no one can or will ever be able to.
*Cough*MOZART*Cough*[/QUOTE]
mozart has more skills although not all of his material is great.[/QUOTE]
Material?
Alright. This is Mozart we're speaking of, not Treasure Moment. World famous, timeless musicians of the classical period do not have "Material". They have works. Pieces. Whatever the plural of "opus" is.
Mozart *has* more skills? I'm assuming then that he's still alive as well, most likely disc jockeying at some underground club? [/QUOTE]
works, pieces... they are all the same as for material. Mozart was great indeed but he cant beat freddie, no one can or will ever be able to.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Treasure Moment wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Sergei? wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Treasure Moment wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Sergei? wrote: [/QUOTENAME]While we're at it..
*Cough*MOZART*Cough*[/QUOTE]
mozart has more skills although not all of his material is great.[/QUOTE]
Material?
Alright. This is Mozart we're speaking of, not Treasure Moment. World famous, timeless musicians of the classical period do not have "Material". They have works. Pieces. Whatever the plural of "opus" is.
Mozart *has* more skills? I'm assuming then that he's still alive as well, most likely disc jockeying at some underground club? [/QUOTE]
works, pieces... they are all the same as for material. Mozart was great indeed but he cant beat freddie, no one can or will ever be able to.[/QUOTE]
I hear they gave each other regular blow jobs.
*Cough*MOZART*Cough*[/QUOTE]
mozart has more skills although not all of his material is great.[/QUOTE]
Material?
Alright. This is Mozart we're speaking of, not Treasure Moment. World famous, timeless musicians of the classical period do not have "Material". They have works. Pieces. Whatever the plural of "opus" is.
Mozart *has* more skills? I'm assuming then that he's still alive as well, most likely disc jockeying at some underground club? [/QUOTE]
works, pieces... they are all the same as for material. Mozart was great indeed but he cant beat freddie, no one can or will ever be able to.[/QUOTE]
I hear they gave each other regular blow jobs.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Treasure Moment wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]QueenMercury46 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Treasure Moment wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Tero wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Treasure Moment wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Ducksoup wrote: [/QUOTENAME]U2, the biggest rock band in the world at the moment, doesn't need Queen + Paul Rodgers.
Queen + Paul Rodgers fill arenas. U2 fill stadiums.
[/QUOTE]
my band musically pisses all over U2 and thats a fact.[/QUOTE]
I can believe you're great in musical pissing (and your fantasies would probably involve golden showers), but do you have the talent or songwriting skills to beat any band?[/QUOTE]
Not any band but certainly U2, rolling stones, the beatles, coldplay and garbage like that, basically the mainstream crap. I would never say that we are musically more skilled than Queen for example becuase that would be a lie. Im not arrogant, im just saying the truth about things.[/QUOTE]
So what exactly makes your band so much better than U2? I'd like to know.[/QUOTE]
well, simply our songwriting and skills. They simply arent on the same level as us or Queen. Queen is about 1 million times better musicians than U2.[/QUOTE]
How can you prove your songwriting skills are better than those of U2? That's right, you can't.
Queen + Paul Rodgers fill arenas. U2 fill stadiums.
[/QUOTE]
my band musically pisses all over U2 and thats a fact.[/QUOTE]
I can believe you're great in musical pissing (and your fantasies would probably involve golden showers), but do you have the talent or songwriting skills to beat any band?[/QUOTE]
Not any band but certainly U2, rolling stones, the beatles, coldplay and garbage like that, basically the mainstream crap. I would never say that we are musically more skilled than Queen for example becuase that would be a lie. Im not arrogant, im just saying the truth about things.[/QUOTE]
So what exactly makes your band so much better than U2? I'd like to know.[/QUOTE]
well, simply our songwriting and skills. They simply arent on the same level as us or Queen. Queen is about 1 million times better musicians than U2.[/QUOTE]
How can you prove your songwriting skills are better than those of U2? That's right, you can't.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]QueenMercury46 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Treasure Moment wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]QueenMercury46 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Treasure Moment wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Tero wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Treasure Moment wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Ducksoup wrote: [/QUOTENAME]U2, the biggest rock band in the world at the moment, doesn't need Queen + Paul Rodgers.
Queen + Paul Rodgers fill arenas. U2 fill stadiums.
[/QUOTE]
my band musically pisses all over U2 and thats a fact.[/QUOTE]
I can believe you're great in musical pissing (and your fantasies would probably involve golden showers), but do you have the talent or songwriting skills to beat any band?[/QUOTE]
Not any band but certainly U2, rolling stones, the beatles, coldplay and garbage like that, basically the mainstream crap. I would never say that we are musically more skilled than Queen for example becuase that would be a lie. Im not arrogant, im just saying the truth about things.[/QUOTE]
So what exactly makes your band so much better than U2? I'd like to know.[/QUOTE]
well, simply our songwriting and skills. They simply arent on the same level as us or Queen. Queen is about 1 million times better musicians than U2.[/QUOTE]
How can you prove your songwriting skills are better than those of U2? That's right, you can't.[/QUOTE]
Im not sure if i can prove it to you because you simply dont seem to understand but as a musician i can hear if a band has talent, good songwriting skills, good musical skills and if the songwriting is predictable or not etc and U2 is a very amateurish band with crappy songs.
Queen + Paul Rodgers fill arenas. U2 fill stadiums.
[/QUOTE]
my band musically pisses all over U2 and thats a fact.[/QUOTE]
I can believe you're great in musical pissing (and your fantasies would probably involve golden showers), but do you have the talent or songwriting skills to beat any band?[/QUOTE]
Not any band but certainly U2, rolling stones, the beatles, coldplay and garbage like that, basically the mainstream crap. I would never say that we are musically more skilled than Queen for example becuase that would be a lie. Im not arrogant, im just saying the truth about things.[/QUOTE]
So what exactly makes your band so much better than U2? I'd like to know.[/QUOTE]
well, simply our songwriting and skills. They simply arent on the same level as us or Queen. Queen is about 1 million times better musicians than U2.[/QUOTE]
How can you prove your songwriting skills are better than those of U2? That's right, you can't.[/QUOTE]
Im not sure if i can prove it to you because you simply dont seem to understand but as a musician i can hear if a band has talent, good songwriting skills, good musical skills and if the songwriting is predictable or not etc and U2 is a very amateurish band with crappy songs.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Treasure Moment wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]QueenMercury46 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Treasure Moment wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]QueenMercury46 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Treasure Moment wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Tero wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Treasure Moment wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Ducksoup wrote: [/QUOTENAME]U2, the biggest rock band in the world at the moment, doesn't need Queen + Paul Rodgers.
Queen + Paul Rodgers fill arenas. U2 fill stadiums.
[/QUOTE]
my band musically pisses all over U2 and thats a fact.[/QUOTE]
I can believe you're great in musical pissing (and your fantasies would probably involve golden showers), but do you have the talent or songwriting skills to beat any band?[/QUOTE]
Not any band but certainly U2, rolling stones, the beatles, coldplay and garbage like that, basically the mainstream crap. I would never say that we are musically more skilled than Queen for example becuase that would be a lie. Im not arrogant, im just saying the truth about things.[/QUOTE]
So what exactly makes your band so much better than U2? I'd like to know.[/QUOTE]
well, simply our songwriting and skills. They simply arent on the same level as us or Queen. Queen is about 1 million times better musicians than U2.[/QUOTE]
How can you prove your songwriting skills are better than those of U2? That's right, you can't.[/QUOTE]
Im not sure if i can prove it to you because you simply dont seem to understand but as a musician i can hear if a band has talent, good songwriting skills, good musical skills and if the songwriting is predictable or not etc and U2 is a very amateurish band with crappy songs.[/QUOTE]
Oh yes, master of music, you know EVERYTHING about anything. YOU are the expert of all there is about music.
Queen + Paul Rodgers fill arenas. U2 fill stadiums.
[/QUOTE]
my band musically pisses all over U2 and thats a fact.[/QUOTE]
I can believe you're great in musical pissing (and your fantasies would probably involve golden showers), but do you have the talent or songwriting skills to beat any band?[/QUOTE]
Not any band but certainly U2, rolling stones, the beatles, coldplay and garbage like that, basically the mainstream crap. I would never say that we are musically more skilled than Queen for example becuase that would be a lie. Im not arrogant, im just saying the truth about things.[/QUOTE]
So what exactly makes your band so much better than U2? I'd like to know.[/QUOTE]
well, simply our songwriting and skills. They simply arent on the same level as us or Queen. Queen is about 1 million times better musicians than U2.[/QUOTE]
How can you prove your songwriting skills are better than those of U2? That's right, you can't.[/QUOTE]
Im not sure if i can prove it to you because you simply dont seem to understand but as a musician i can hear if a band has talent, good songwriting skills, good musical skills and if the songwriting is predictable or not etc and U2 is a very amateurish band with crappy songs.[/QUOTE]
Oh yes, master of music, you know EVERYTHING about anything. YOU are the expert of all there is about music.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]QueenMercury46 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Treasure Moment wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]QueenMercury46 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Treasure Moment wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]QueenMercury46 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Treasure Moment wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Tero wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Treasure Moment wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Ducksoup wrote: [/QUOTENAME]U2, the biggest rock band in the world at the moment, doesn't need Queen + Paul Rodgers.
Queen + Paul Rodgers fill arenas. U2 fill stadiums.
[/QUOTE]
my band musically pisses all over U2 and thats a fact.[/QUOTE]
I can believe you're great in musical pissing (and your fantasies would probably involve golden showers), but do you have the talent or songwriting skills to beat any band?[/QUOTE]
Not any band but certainly U2, rolling stones, the beatles, coldplay and garbage like that, basically the mainstream crap. I would never say that we are musically more skilled than Queen for example becuase that would be a lie. Im not arrogant, im just saying the truth about things.[/QUOTE]
So what exactly makes your band so much better than U2? I'd like to know.[/QUOTE]
well, simply our songwriting and skills. They simply arent on the same level as us or Queen. Queen is about 1 million times better musicians than U2.[/QUOTE]
How can you prove your songwriting skills are better than those of U2? That's right, you can't.[/QUOTE]
Im not sure if i can prove it to you because you simply dont seem to understand but as a musician i can hear if a band has talent, good songwriting skills, good musical skills and if the songwriting is predictable or not etc and U2 is a very amateurish band with crappy songs.[/QUOTE]
Oh yes, master of music, you know EVERYTHING about anything. YOU are the expert of all there is about music.[/QUOTE]
Yes i can analyze music.
Queen + Paul Rodgers fill arenas. U2 fill stadiums.
[/QUOTE]
my band musically pisses all over U2 and thats a fact.[/QUOTE]
I can believe you're great in musical pissing (and your fantasies would probably involve golden showers), but do you have the talent or songwriting skills to beat any band?[/QUOTE]
Not any band but certainly U2, rolling stones, the beatles, coldplay and garbage like that, basically the mainstream crap. I would never say that we are musically more skilled than Queen for example becuase that would be a lie. Im not arrogant, im just saying the truth about things.[/QUOTE]
So what exactly makes your band so much better than U2? I'd like to know.[/QUOTE]
well, simply our songwriting and skills. They simply arent on the same level as us or Queen. Queen is about 1 million times better musicians than U2.[/QUOTE]
How can you prove your songwriting skills are better than those of U2? That's right, you can't.[/QUOTE]
Im not sure if i can prove it to you because you simply dont seem to understand but as a musician i can hear if a band has talent, good songwriting skills, good musical skills and if the songwriting is predictable or not etc and U2 is a very amateurish band with crappy songs.[/QUOTE]
Oh yes, master of music, you know EVERYTHING about anything. YOU are the expert of all there is about music.[/QUOTE]
Yes i can analyze music.
I expect your analysis to be written in crayon, no less.
You're fucking clueless sometimes, man.... I hate U2, but really. It doesn't make you any less of an ass.
You're fucking clueless sometimes, man.... I hate U2, but really. It doesn't make you any less of an ass.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Zebonka12 wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I expect your analysis to be written in crayon, no less.
You're fucking clueless sometimes, man.... I hate U2, but really. It doesn't make you any less of an ass.[/QUOTE]
zebonka im not clueless, i know exactly what im talking about and im not arrogant, if i hear something that is quality i will say it, like someone mentioned TSO and i checked them out and it was much better than bands like U2 for example.
You're fucking clueless sometimes, man.... I hate U2, but really. It doesn't make you any less of an ass.[/QUOTE]
zebonka im not clueless, i know exactly what im talking about and im not arrogant, if i hear something that is quality i will say it, like someone mentioned TSO and i checked them out and it was much better than bands like U2 for example.
Can you name 5 quality bands excluding Queen and Treasure Moment?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Smitty wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Can you name 5 quality bands excluding Queen and Treasure Moment?[/QUOTE]
There are alot of quality songs from different bands but not all of their stuff, it just shows that they are capable of good quality musicianship and songwriting. For example artists like guns and roses, metallica, europe, yngwie malmsteen, sepultura, alphaville, george michael, tears for fears, vangelis, pet shop boys have all proved to be capable of making solid creative good songwriting with good musicianship.
There are alot of quality songs from different bands but not all of their stuff, it just shows that they are capable of good quality musicianship and songwriting. For example artists like guns and roses, metallica, europe, yngwie malmsteen, sepultura, alphaville, george michael, tears for fears, vangelis, pet shop boys have all proved to be capable of making solid creative good songwriting with good musicianship.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Treasure Moment wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Smitty wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Can you name 5 quality bands excluding Queen and Treasure Moment?[/QUOTE]
There are alot of quality songs from different bands but not all of their stuff, it just shows that they are capable of good quality musicianship and songwriting. For example artists like guns and roses, metallica, europe, yngwie malmsteen, sepultura, alphaville, george michael, tears for fears, vangelis, pet shop boys have all proved to be capable of making solid creative good songwriting with good musicianship.[/QUOTE]
The fucking Pet Shop Boys? Alphaville?
You big faggie. And I don't mean that in the homosexual context.
Thanks for including Europe. At least NOW you give them credit.
There are alot of quality songs from different bands but not all of their stuff, it just shows that they are capable of good quality musicianship and songwriting. For example artists like guns and roses, metallica, europe, yngwie malmsteen, sepultura, alphaville, george michael, tears for fears, vangelis, pet shop boys have all proved to be capable of making solid creative good songwriting with good musicianship.[/QUOTE]
The fucking Pet Shop Boys? Alphaville?
You big faggie. And I don't mean that in the homosexual context.
Thanks for including Europe. At least NOW you give them credit.