[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Mack2008 wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Does it say if any snails were harmed in the making of the booklet?
[/QUOTE]
Slugs actually if you want to get it right ;-)
Thread
Posts in chronological order
I don't see the problem... I guess I'm not a true fan... :'(
I was kinda hoping there'd be credit information, like who played what, but I guess what confuses me the most is what people dislike about it? Apart from mashing those keys to say "IT SUCKS", well, why not tell us what sucks about it?
Is it the font? The size? The white on black? The yellow-to-blue gradient on the song titles? The fact that it's 3 columns? That there's only 4 spreads? That there's only 2 pictures? That the lyrics are included? What could it possibly be? Enlighten us.
It's a booklet, with lyrics in it. What more do you need? What more do you expect? I'm quite happy with it. I like to know what I'm singing along to, and the booklet provides me with that information.
Is it the font? The size? The white on black? The yellow-to-blue gradient on the song titles? The fact that it's 3 columns? That there's only 4 spreads? That there's only 2 pictures? That the lyrics are included? What could it possibly be? Enlighten us.
It's a booklet, with lyrics in it. What more do you need? What more do you expect? I'm quite happy with it. I like to know what I'm singing along to, and the booklet provides me with that information.
LMAO...I've missed you, Lester!
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Hitman1965 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Mack2008 wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Does it say if any snails were harmed in the making of the booklet?
[/QUOTE]
Slugs actually if you want to get it right ;-)[/QUOTE]
I'm sure the slugs working in the postal services involved with the materials got harmed, trying to peek inside the boxes :-)
[/QUOTE]
Slugs actually if you want to get it right ;-)[/QUOTE]
I'm sure the slugs working in the postal services involved with the materials got harmed, trying to peek inside the boxes :-)
I guess a scanner is way too expensive
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Adolfo wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I guess a scanner is way too expensive[/QUOTE]
Are you joking, or are you really bitching cause it's not scanned? Gotta love QZ...
Are you joking, or are you really bitching cause it's not scanned? Gotta love QZ...
As a matterof fact, I think that the photos in the booklet are WAY better than the cover of the album.
Take a look at the back cover for example. THAT should have been the cover...
Take a look at the back cover for example. THAT should have been the cover...
Friends, don't get me wrong.
I'm not one of the radical QPR haters, but one of the strong supporters.
I loved their 2005/2006 tours and I will attend this tour.
I think it's great that they do an album.
I've heard all the tracks (at least the samples) and I love everything except Still Burning and Voodoo .
But I can't say something positive about a black background full of flying sperms overlayed with a writing in a really ugly font in one corner and a miniature photo of those 3 gentlemen in the other corner.
Also what is so fantastic about white text on black paper ?
The cover and the booklet are ugly and boring.
However that doesn't affect my opinion about the album which I'm really looking forward to.
I'm not one of the radical QPR haters, but one of the strong supporters.
I loved their 2005/2006 tours and I will attend this tour.
I think it's great that they do an album.
I've heard all the tracks (at least the samples) and I love everything except Still Burning and Voodoo .
But I can't say something positive about a black background full of flying sperms overlayed with a writing in a really ugly font in one corner and a miniature photo of those 3 gentlemen in the other corner.
Also what is so fantastic about white text on black paper ?
The cover and the booklet are ugly and boring.
However that doesn't affect my opinion about the album which I'm really looking forward to.
you rock dude ;)
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Mustapha_Ibrahim wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Take a look at the back cover for example. THAT should have been the cover...[/QUOTE]
I like that pic too. But it doesn't really suit to the title of the album.
I like that pic too. But it doesn't really suit to the title of the album.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]pittrek wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
But I can't say something positive about a black background full of flying sperms overlayed with a writing in a really ugly font in one corner and a miniature photo of those 3 gentlemen in the other corner.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]q-_-p wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Looks like God ejaculated within the confines of the cosmos on the front cover[/QUOTE]
Boy you all are sure missing Freddie. Follow me here, and I'll steer you thru.
We all know Freddie was Made In Heaven. (Album)
We all know Freddie went back to Heaven. (Track 13)
We all know that Heaven and The Cosmos are similar concepts.
DON'T YOU GET IT?
That's Freddie spreading his love over the QPR Project.
Gross.
But I can't say something positive about a black background full of flying sperms overlayed with a writing in a really ugly font in one corner and a miniature photo of those 3 gentlemen in the other corner.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]q-_-p wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Looks like God ejaculated within the confines of the cosmos on the front cover[/QUOTE]
Boy you all are sure missing Freddie. Follow me here, and I'll steer you thru.
We all know Freddie was Made In Heaven. (Album)
We all know Freddie went back to Heaven. (Track 13)
We all know that Heaven and The Cosmos are similar concepts.
DON'T YOU GET IT?
That's Freddie spreading his love over the QPR Project.
Gross.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Erin wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Adolfo wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I guess a scanner is way too expensive[/QUOTE]
Are you joking, or are you really bitching cause it's not scanned? Gotta love QZ...[/QUOTE]
We need to be tolerant of those who download the album. Elitist album-buyers shouldn't be the only ones entitled to the booklet.
Are you joking, or are you really bitching cause it's not scanned? Gotta love QZ...[/QUOTE]
We need to be tolerant of those who download the album. Elitist album-buyers shouldn't be the only ones entitled to the booklet.
Not really bad.
Reminds me a bit of A Kind Of Magic.
Reminds me a bit of A Kind Of Magic.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Sir GH wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Erin wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Adolfo wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I guess a scanner is way too expensive[/QUOTE]
Are you joking, or are you really bitching cause it's not scanned? Gotta love QZ...[/QUOTE]
We need to be tolerant of those who download the album. Elitist album-buyers shouldn't be the only ones entitled to the booklet.
[/QUOTE]
Agreed.
Much as I hate the download concept for the fact that most all legit downloads are lossy, it would be nice to include digital copies of the booklets as well.
I think it's been a major complaint among people who buy from iTunes, the lack of 'booklets' of sorts.
It's also a bit more of a slap in the face too, when in some cases the album could be had cheaper as a physical product (actual CD or whatever), whether in-store or ordered online elsewhere.
Are you joking, or are you really bitching cause it's not scanned? Gotta love QZ...[/QUOTE]
We need to be tolerant of those who download the album. Elitist album-buyers shouldn't be the only ones entitled to the booklet.
[/QUOTE]
Agreed.
Much as I hate the download concept for the fact that most all legit downloads are lossy, it would be nice to include digital copies of the booklets as well.
I think it's been a major complaint among people who buy from iTunes, the lack of 'booklets' of sorts.
It's also a bit more of a slap in the face too, when in some cases the album could be had cheaper as a physical product (actual CD or whatever), whether in-store or ordered online elsewhere.