Queen crest Queenzone

Rolling Stone

19 posts Page 2 of 2
Thread

Posts in chronological order

Search forum
[b]tjbarrett96 wrote: [/b]Is it just me, or does it seem as if Rolling Stone has a grudge against Queen? All of their albums get two or three stars at most (excluding ANATO, which got five ;-).[/QUOTE][br][br][br]They always had a grudge against Queen.[br][br][br][br]
"Please buy my upcoming album... I need the money"
I've said this time & time again, If people who read RS mag bought only the albums which they praised, said person would have the worst music collection ever! It's really sad how many people in the US & worldwide put so much stock into that magizine. As if what they print is gospel. They are so self validating its sickening. I was watching the movie Almost Famous last week & the way they were presented, the mag that is, as total ego maniacs. They must really believe what they are shoveling. Saddly so do millions of others. Granted that is a movie & maybe Crowe wanted to make them appear like that. But I'm not surprised if thats how it was & still is.
"Take care of those you call your own"
[QUOTE] [b]Treasure Moment wrote: [/b] ThomasQuinn wrote: Treasure Moment wrote:  true, you could always learn something but the way he is talking is like we cant make music already Which, in fact, you can't - you're not improving the least bit, and you keep insisting that dull and predictable chord changes with annoying anti-melodies over them makes good music. It doesn't. Plus, you refuse to learn the least bit about how music is constructed, how harmony works, how melodies are formed, everything! You believe that you know everything and are great, when in fact you are about as knowledgeable and skillful as the average garage punk-rocker. [br] [br] are you in some deep fucking denial? we make predictable chord changes? are you out of your fucking mind? anti melody? haha music cant have more melody than ours and you call it anti melody, you really know shit about music and thats a FACT![/QUOTE][br]Have you *heard* your latest song? There IS no melody, only fucking annoying triadic arpeggios!!![br][br][br][br][br][br][br]
Not Plutus but Apollo rules Parnassus
[b]ThomasQuinn wrote: [/b] [b]Treasure Moment wrote: [/b]ThomasQuinn wrote: Treasure Moment wrote:  true, you could always learn something but the way he is talking is like we cant make music already Which, in fact, you can't - you're not improving the least bit, and you keep insisting that dull and predictable chord changes with annoying anti-melodies over them makes good music. It doesn't. Plus, you refuse to learn the least bit about how music is constructed, how harmony works, how melodies are formed, everything! You believe that you know everything and are great, when in fact you are about as knowledgeable and skillful as the average garage punk-rocker. [br][br]are you in some deep fucking denial? we make predictable chord changes? are you out of your fucking mind? anti melody? haha music cant have more melody than ours and you call it anti melody, you really know shit about music and thats a FACT![/QUOTE][br]Have you *heard* your latest song? There IS no melody, only fucking annoying triadic arpeggios!!![br][br][br][br][br][br][br][/QUOTE][br][br][br]haha "no melody" check your ears you stupid fool! go back listening to boring predictable 3 chord songs[br][br][br][br]
Freddie Mercury is God TREASURE MOMENT: Continuing QUEENs footsteps http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=42215463