A Day at the races is probably more consistent than opera, but I still think A Night at the opera is the better overall album. The second side of opera....The prophet song, love of my life, good company, and bo rhap is the greatest of their career. Even possibly better than Queen2, the black side.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
[QUOTE]
[b]Zebonka12 wrote: [/b]
I think the situation is slightly different. Back then it was a make or break point in their career.
In 2008, they've got more money than sense and can do whatever the hell they like... !
[/QUOTE]
You are right! Then they worked for their name, now the name is working for them!
[b]Zebonka12 wrote: [/b]
I think the situation is slightly different. Back then it was a make or break point in their career.
In 2008, they've got more money than sense and can do whatever the hell they like... !
[/QUOTE]
You are right! Then they worked for their name, now the name is working for them!
[QUOTE]
[b]Zebonka12 wrote: [/b]
I think the situation is slightly different. Back then it was a make or break point in their career.
In 2008, they've got more money than sense and can do whatever the hell they like... !
[/QUOTE]
Thanks for clarifying that...I honestly had no clue that people would seem to have such a hard time understanding something so simple!
[b]Zebonka12 wrote: [/b]
I think the situation is slightly different. Back then it was a make or break point in their career.
In 2008, they've got more money than sense and can do whatever the hell they like... !
[/QUOTE]
Thanks for clarifying that...I honestly had no clue that people would seem to have such a hard time understanding something so simple!
[QUOTE]
[b]redspecialusa wrote: [/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]Zebonka12 wrote: [/b]
I think the situation is slightly different. Back then it was a make or break point in their career.
In 2008, they've got more money than sense and can do whatever the hell they like... !
[/QUOTE]
Thanks for clarifying that...I honestly had no clue that people would seem to have such a hard time understanding something so simple!
[/QUOTE]
I don`t agree with you, I think Zebonka`s observation is quite relevant and logical and appropriately swift as a reply.
[b]redspecialusa wrote: [/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]Zebonka12 wrote: [/b]
I think the situation is slightly different. Back then it was a make or break point in their career.
In 2008, they've got more money than sense and can do whatever the hell they like... !
[/QUOTE]
Thanks for clarifying that...I honestly had no clue that people would seem to have such a hard time understanding something so simple!
[/QUOTE]
I don`t agree with you, I think Zebonka`s observation is quite relevant and logical and appropriately swift as a reply.
[QUOTE]
[b]April wrote: [/b]
Crisstti, 39 is a very good song, just don`t hurry, listen to it again. I sometimes can`t help singing it the whole day. i agree with the opinion that 39 is one of the best songs. How the stadium sang it all along with Queen at their concert last year!!! And what do you mean you haven`t listened to ANATO? How is it possible, you know the songs?
[/QUOTE]
Oh, YouTube, or course :), that's how had listened the songs.
I did listen to it yesterday, though.
Like I've said elsewhere here, I am a new fan, so I haven't had time to listen to all of the albums nor songs. And I like to listen to a "new" album many times, because just one listen is not enough at all. I mean, I didn't like AT ALL Wild Life when I first heard it, and now it's one my favourites (I'm talking about the Paul McCartney album, of course...).
I sill don't like much 39 nor Good Company, I like a little better Sweet Lady, and a little less I'm in love with my car.
[b]April wrote: [/b]
Crisstti, 39 is a very good song, just don`t hurry, listen to it again. I sometimes can`t help singing it the whole day. i agree with the opinion that 39 is one of the best songs. How the stadium sang it all along with Queen at their concert last year!!! And what do you mean you haven`t listened to ANATO? How is it possible, you know the songs?
[/QUOTE]
Oh, YouTube, or course :), that's how had listened the songs.
I did listen to it yesterday, though.
Like I've said elsewhere here, I am a new fan, so I haven't had time to listen to all of the albums nor songs. And I like to listen to a "new" album many times, because just one listen is not enough at all. I mean, I didn't like AT ALL Wild Life when I first heard it, and now it's one my favourites (I'm talking about the Paul McCartney album, of course...).
I sill don't like much 39 nor Good Company, I like a little better Sweet Lady, and a little less I'm in love with my car.
[QUOTE]
[b]April wrote: [/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]redspecialusa wrote: [/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]Zebonka12 wrote: [/b]
I think the situation is slightly different. Back then it was a make or break point in their career.
In 2008, they've got more money than sense and can do whatever the hell they like... !
[/QUOTE]
Thanks for clarifying that...I honestly had no clue that people would seem to have such a hard time understanding something so simple!
[/QUOTE]
I don`t agree with you, I think Zebonka`s observation is quite relevant and logical and appropriately swift as a reply.
[/QUOTE]
Really? The same principle applies, despite my sarcastic tone
What demand is there for another Q+PR album?? Nobody is willing to invest time and money in following up on a flop.
More so now in this financial climate. You really expect a multi national record label rushing to get more of "TCR"???
As for the band, they have more money than sense, true but they're not idiots.
[b]April wrote: [/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]redspecialusa wrote: [/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]Zebonka12 wrote: [/b]
I think the situation is slightly different. Back then it was a make or break point in their career.
In 2008, they've got more money than sense and can do whatever the hell they like... !
[/QUOTE]
Thanks for clarifying that...I honestly had no clue that people would seem to have such a hard time understanding something so simple!
[/QUOTE]
I don`t agree with you, I think Zebonka`s observation is quite relevant and logical and appropriately swift as a reply.
[/QUOTE]
Really? The same principle applies, despite my sarcastic tone
What demand is there for another Q+PR album?? Nobody is willing to invest time and money in following up on a flop.
More so now in this financial climate. You really expect a multi national record label rushing to get more of "TCR"???
As for the band, they have more money than sense, true but they're not idiots.
[QUOTE]
[b]April wrote: [/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]redspecialusa wrote: [/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]Zebonka12 wrote: [/b]
I think the situation is slightly different. Back then it was a make or break point in their career.
In 2008, they've got more money than sense and can do whatever the hell they like... !
[/QUOTE]
Thanks for clarifying that...I honestly had no clue that people would seem to have such a hard time understanding something so simple!
[/QUOTE]
I don`t agree with you, I think Zebonka`s observation is quite relevant and logical and appropriately swift as a reply.
[/QUOTE]
Are you high? Do you understand what I'm trying to say? He took what I said earlier in this thread, and explained it further...I was giving him props for making it simple for those who are too stupid to understand. He was agreeing with me, and I was agreeing with him. Is that so hard to see?
[b]April wrote: [/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]redspecialusa wrote: [/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]Zebonka12 wrote: [/b]
I think the situation is slightly different. Back then it was a make or break point in their career.
In 2008, they've got more money than sense and can do whatever the hell they like... !
[/QUOTE]
Thanks for clarifying that...I honestly had no clue that people would seem to have such a hard time understanding something so simple!
[/QUOTE]
I don`t agree with you, I think Zebonka`s observation is quite relevant and logical and appropriately swift as a reply.
[/QUOTE]
Are you high? Do you understand what I'm trying to say? He took what I said earlier in this thread, and explained it further...I was giving him props for making it simple for those who are too stupid to understand. He was agreeing with me, and I was agreeing with him. Is that so hard to see?
Calm yourselves dudes, there'll be no fighting today unless I start it with an AIDS pun!
[QUOTE]
[b]Zebonka12 wrote: [/b]
Calm yourselves dudes, there'll be no fighting today unless I start it with an AIDS pun!
[/QUOTE]
You mean Gene Simmons IS going to start collecting royalty cheques for AIDS medicine that goes to Africa? SAY IT'S NOT TRUE!!
[b]Zebonka12 wrote: [/b]
Calm yourselves dudes, there'll be no fighting today unless I start it with an AIDS pun!
[/QUOTE]
You mean Gene Simmons IS going to start collecting royalty cheques for AIDS medicine that goes to Africa? SAY IT'S NOT TRUE!!
[QUOTE]
[b]Zebonka12 wrote: [/b]
In 2008, they've got more money than sense and can do whatever the hell they like... !
[/QUOTE]
The joys of being senile and rich.
[b]Zebonka12 wrote: [/b]
In 2008, they've got more money than sense and can do whatever the hell they like... !
[/QUOTE]
The joys of being senile and rich.
[QUOTE]
[b]redspecialusa wrote:[/b]
You mean Gene Simmons IS going to start collecting royalty cheques for AIDS medicine that goes to Africa? SAY IT'S NOT TRUE!!
[/QUOTE]
It's among one of his most noble ACCOLAIDS.
[b]redspecialusa wrote:[/b]
You mean Gene Simmons IS going to start collecting royalty cheques for AIDS medicine that goes to Africa? SAY IT'S NOT TRUE!!
[/QUOTE]
It's among one of his most noble ACCOLAIDS.
[QUOTE]
[b]redspecialusa wrote: [/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]April wrote: [/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]redspecialusa wrote: [/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]Zebonka12 wrote: [/b]
I think the situation is slightly different. Back then it was a make or break point in their career.
In 2008, they've got more money than sense and can do whatever the hell they like... !
[/QUOTE]
Thanks for clarifying that...I honestly had no clue that people would seem to have such a hard time understanding something so simple!
[/QUOTE]
[b]I don`t agree with you[/b], I think Zebonka`s observation is quite relevant and logical and appropriately swift as a reply.
[/QUOTE]
[b]Are you high? Do you understand what [/b]I'm trying to say? He took what I said earlier in this thread, and explained it further...I was giving him props for making it simple for those who are too stupid to understand. He was agreeing with me, and I was agreeing with him. [b]Is that so hard to see?[/b]
[/QUOTE]
Look at the way I wrote to you and look at the way you wrote to me. You should be ashamed of your style. A guy speaking in such a way to a girl...
[b]redspecialusa wrote: [/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]April wrote: [/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]redspecialusa wrote: [/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]Zebonka12 wrote: [/b]
I think the situation is slightly different. Back then it was a make or break point in their career.
In 2008, they've got more money than sense and can do whatever the hell they like... !
[/QUOTE]
Thanks for clarifying that...I honestly had no clue that people would seem to have such a hard time understanding something so simple!
[/QUOTE]
[b]I don`t agree with you[/b], I think Zebonka`s observation is quite relevant and logical and appropriately swift as a reply.
[/QUOTE]
[b]Are you high? Do you understand what [/b]I'm trying to say? He took what I said earlier in this thread, and explained it further...I was giving him props for making it simple for those who are too stupid to understand. He was agreeing with me, and I was agreeing with him. [b]Is that so hard to see?[/b]
[/QUOTE]
Look at the way I wrote to you and look at the way you wrote to me. You should be ashamed of your style. A guy speaking in such a way to a girl...
[QUOTE]
[b]Crisstti wrote: [/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]April wrote: [/b]
Crisstti, 39 is a very good song, just don`t hurry, listen to it again. I sometimes can`t help singing it the whole day. i agree with the opinion that 39 is one of the best songs. How the stadium sang it all along with Queen at their concert last year!!! And what do you mean you haven`t listened to ANATO? How is it possible, you know the songs?
[/QUOTE]
Oh, YouTube, or course :), that's how had listened the songs.
I did listen to it yesterday, though.
Like I've said elsewhere here, I am a new fan, so I haven't had time to listen to all of the albums nor songs. And I like to listen to a "new" album many times, because just one listen is not enough at all. I mean, I didn't like AT ALL Wild Life when I first heard it, and now it's one my favourites (I'm talking about the Paul McCartney album, of course...).
I sill don't like much 39 nor Good Company, I like a little better Sweet Lady, and a little less I'm in love with my car.
[/QUOTE]
I take ANATO as a whole, as an inseparable construct (if it is possible to say so). I can`t imagine throwing one song out of the album or saying that this song is not so good and that is ok. For me it is one unity.
Unfortunately, I don`t know this Paul`s album, as I am not much of his fan, I know his classical solo albums such as Ram, Band On the Run, Venus and Mars. They are great.
Listen to ANATO not song by song on YouTube but listen to the album. I think that is the problem with those who don`t like some of the songs on it. The album was supposed to be listened to as a whole. I am sure of it.
[b]Crisstti wrote: [/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]April wrote: [/b]
Crisstti, 39 is a very good song, just don`t hurry, listen to it again. I sometimes can`t help singing it the whole day. i agree with the opinion that 39 is one of the best songs. How the stadium sang it all along with Queen at their concert last year!!! And what do you mean you haven`t listened to ANATO? How is it possible, you know the songs?
[/QUOTE]
Oh, YouTube, or course :), that's how had listened the songs.
I did listen to it yesterday, though.
Like I've said elsewhere here, I am a new fan, so I haven't had time to listen to all of the albums nor songs. And I like to listen to a "new" album many times, because just one listen is not enough at all. I mean, I didn't like AT ALL Wild Life when I first heard it, and now it's one my favourites (I'm talking about the Paul McCartney album, of course...).
I sill don't like much 39 nor Good Company, I like a little better Sweet Lady, and a little less I'm in love with my car.
[/QUOTE]
I take ANATO as a whole, as an inseparable construct (if it is possible to say so). I can`t imagine throwing one song out of the album or saying that this song is not so good and that is ok. For me it is one unity.
Unfortunately, I don`t know this Paul`s album, as I am not much of his fan, I know his classical solo albums such as Ram, Band On the Run, Venus and Mars. They are great.
Listen to ANATO not song by song on YouTube but listen to the album. I think that is the problem with those who don`t like some of the songs on it. The album was supposed to be listened to as a whole. I am sure of it.
[QUOTE]
[b]April wrote: [/b]
Look at the way I wrote to you and look at the way you wrote to me. You should be ashamed of your style. A guy speaking in such a way to a girl...
[/QUOTE]
If I made you upset with what I said, I sincerely apologize; however, as I said before what Zebonka said was similar to what I said. By that logic...if you disagree with what I said, then you should disagree with what Zebonka said. Period. And I still don't understand what you said before...it makes no sense to me.
[b]April wrote: [/b]
Look at the way I wrote to you and look at the way you wrote to me. You should be ashamed of your style. A guy speaking in such a way to a girl...
[/QUOTE]
If I made you upset with what I said, I sincerely apologize; however, as I said before what Zebonka said was similar to what I said. By that logic...if you disagree with what I said, then you should disagree with what Zebonka said. Period. And I still don't understand what you said before...it makes no sense to me.
[QUOTE]
[b]redspecialusa wrote:[/b]
then you should disagree with what Zebonka said.
[/QUOTE]
That's never a good idea, never!
[b]redspecialusa wrote:[/b]
then you should disagree with what Zebonka said.
[/QUOTE]
That's never a good idea, never!