Skip to content
Queen crest Queenzone.org

AKOM: Roger or Paul?

22 posts Page 2 of 2
Thread

Posts in chronological order

Search forum
A


YourValentine wrote:

Roger. It was not only the singing, it was Paul Rodgers not moving at all during this song (don't go too far away from the tele prompter!) which made the song boring.



Agree. The same at the concert in Moscow. I thought Paul needed more action and motion. They sang Shooting Star, which I liked very much, though heard it for the first time.

T
i'll go against the grain here (lol) as a PR fan and say paul,purely because i think roger is more a backing singer and as a front man his vocal is not nearly good enough

(personal opinion btw,so dont hang me,lol)
daz
M
Neither.
Hotdog
H
Roger definitely.
"Queen is the only band in the world that can play so heavily that your nose bleeds, then offer a silk handkerchief to clean up with."
R
Freddie
S
Roger sings with a lot of heart, soul and rock intensity.

That sideshow singer could never sing aKoM as credibly as Roger.
Socialism: There's one for you, nineteen for me Should five per cent appear too small Be thankful I don't take it all
R