Just wait Bob ;-)
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Oh, I'm waiting ;)
[QUOTE] [b]The Real Wizard wrote:[/b]
Has anyone ever done a good copy of this video with the better sounding source synched to it?[/QUOTE]
You mean this??
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGFhaELH5KI
Has anyone ever done a good copy of this video with the better sounding source synched to it?[/QUOTE]
You mean this??
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGFhaELH5KI
[QUOTE] [b]fr1986 wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]The Real Wizard wrote:[/b]
Has anyone ever done a good copy of this video with the better sounding source synched to it?[/QUOTE]
You mean this??
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGFhaELH5KI
[/QUOTE]
Very nice !
There's software with a "de-shaken" function on it, and this video would benefit greatly from it.
[QUOTE] [b]The Real Wizard wrote:[/b]
Has anyone ever done a good copy of this video with the better sounding source synched to it?[/QUOTE]
You mean this??
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGFhaELH5KI
[/QUOTE]
Very nice !
There's software with a "de-shaken" function on it, and this video would benefit greatly from it.
[QUOTE]
[b]The Real Wizard wrote: [/b] [QUOTE] [b]fr1986 wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]The Real Wizard wrote:[/b]
Has anyone ever done a good copy of this video with the better sounding source synched to it?[/QUOTE]
You mean this??
[url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGFhaELH5KI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGFhaELH5KI[/url]
[/QUOTE]
Very nice !
There's software with a "de-shaken" function on it, and this video would benefit greatly from it.
[/QUOTE]
I find very often that stabilizing video also sacrifices some of the video - so you get a zoomed in, but stabilized video. There might be software that does it without zooming in, but I haven't encountered it.
[b]The Real Wizard wrote: [/b] [QUOTE] [b]fr1986 wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]The Real Wizard wrote:[/b]
Has anyone ever done a good copy of this video with the better sounding source synched to it?[/QUOTE]
You mean this??
[url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGFhaELH5KI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGFhaELH5KI[/url]
[/QUOTE]
Very nice !
There's software with a "de-shaken" function on it, and this video would benefit greatly from it.
[/QUOTE]
I find very often that stabilizing video also sacrifices some of the video - so you get a zoomed in, but stabilized video. There might be software that does it without zooming in, but I haven't encountered it.
Nope. That's the principle of de-shaking a video shot by a hand-held camera. You always lose a certain part of the borders
[QUOTE]
[b]Nitroboy wrote: [/b] [QUOTE]
[b]The Real Wizard wrote: [/b] [QUOTE] [b]fr1986 wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]The Real Wizard wrote:[/b]
Has anyone ever done a good copy of this video with the better sounding source synched to it?[/QUOTE]
You mean this??
[url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGFhaELH5KI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGFhaELH5KI[/url]
[/QUOTE]
Very nice !
There's software with a "de-shaken" function on it, and this video would benefit greatly from it.
[/QUOTE]
I find very often that stabilizing video also sacrifices some of the video - so you get a zoomed in, but stabilized video. There might be software that does it without zooming in, but I haven't encountered it.[/QUOTE]
Yes, After Effects is capable of it by interpolating the borders or 'making them up' and it doesn't look very good on any of the sources we have to deal with. Plus it takes awful lot of time to render a video with this option applied.
The thing with stabilizing amateur videos is this, almost always they are too dark and the level of detail is too poor to be properly tracked, not to mention that sometimes some parts can be shaky beyond belief and can't be stabilized. And with all that, the video can have lens blur from the original camera (like St Paul 1980) which can't be corrected.
[b]Nitroboy wrote: [/b] [QUOTE]
[b]The Real Wizard wrote: [/b] [QUOTE] [b]fr1986 wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]The Real Wizard wrote:[/b]
Has anyone ever done a good copy of this video with the better sounding source synched to it?[/QUOTE]
You mean this??
[url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGFhaELH5KI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGFhaELH5KI[/url]
[/QUOTE]
Very nice !
There's software with a "de-shaken" function on it, and this video would benefit greatly from it.
[/QUOTE]
I find very often that stabilizing video also sacrifices some of the video - so you get a zoomed in, but stabilized video. There might be software that does it without zooming in, but I haven't encountered it.[/QUOTE]
Yes, After Effects is capable of it by interpolating the borders or 'making them up' and it doesn't look very good on any of the sources we have to deal with. Plus it takes awful lot of time to render a video with this option applied.
The thing with stabilizing amateur videos is this, almost always they are too dark and the level of detail is too poor to be properly tracked, not to mention that sometimes some parts can be shaky beyond belief and can't be stabilized. And with all that, the video can have lens blur from the original camera (like St Paul 1980) which can't be corrected.
Surely someone must have a better copy? Snow Productions messed it up - there are blended frames all over the place :P
Every frame is blended! I was skeptical about trying any stabilizing on this before actually downloading it. Once I did, I realised deshaking would be plain impossible (I tried it out, looks like shit).
Every frame is blended! I was skeptical about trying any stabilizing on this before actually downloading it. Once I did, I realised deshaking would be plain impossible (I tried it out, looks like shit).