[b]Music Association Game [/b](name of the game, but appears to be "no subject" :-S..)
Let There Be More Light - Pink Floyd.
The next song must contain one word from
the song title eg. (Let There Be More Light).
For example:
Ray of [b]Light [/b]- Madonna.
Now your turn...
Thread
Posts in chronological order
I was going to play, but forgot how. I guess I'll leave.
aint gonna do 'ray of light'..
Back To The Light seems more apt :-]
Back To The Light seems more apt :-]
There Is A Light That Never Goes Out - The Smiths
Light's [b][i]Out[/i][/b] - Peter Wolf
out of touch-hall & oates
Losing [b]Touch[/b] - The Killers.
[I hope I got the rules right...lol]
[I hope I got the rules right...lol]
[b][i]"Love Touch"~ [/i][/b]Rod Stewart
[i][b]"I Will Always Love You"~[/b][/i]Whitney Houston
I [b]will [/b]- The Beatles - White Album :op
[Am I playing the thing right!? lol]
[Am I playing the thing right!? lol]
I was born to love you
"Born to be Wild" ~ Steppenwolf
[QUOTE]
[b]magicalfreddiemercury wrote: [/b]
"Born to be Wild" ~ Steppenwolf[/QUOTE]
[b]Wild[/b][i] Horses[/i] - Rolling Stones!!!
[Yeaaahroww! Love this song. lol]
[b]magicalfreddiemercury wrote: [/b]
"Born to be Wild" ~ Steppenwolf[/QUOTE]
[b]Wild[/b][i] Horses[/i] - Rolling Stones!!!
[Yeaaahroww! Love this song. lol]
I've got a really good one but unfortunately "Chestnut Mare" doesn't have Horse in the title. Can I just say "Chestnut Horse"?
[QUOTE]
[b]Zebonka12 wrote: [/b]
I've got a really good one but unfortunately "Chestnut Mare" doesn't have Horse in the title. Can I just say "Chestnut Horse"?
[/QUOTE]
Hahaha. No, it's using the name of the male to mean the female - sexism!
:op
*Note: Even though people here use the female term in a derogatory way, pretty much like "bitch" in English, but the problem is that there's already the equivalent of bitch in our language. There are so many ways of speaking about...women who are more tolerant regarding sex issues than the average:
Vaca! (Cow!)
Cadela! (Bitch!)
Égua! (Mare!)
And on and on...well, Brazil. lol
Well, I don't care as long as the fish are spared, really. Up until now, even though the average female fish is more licentious, people haven't coined here a derogatory expression based on it.
Though we're all animals...it's just that humans are conscious about moral rules they create through language and devised all kinds of ways of making, or trying to make, people accountable for their acts based on such rules, which we usually don't follow, I don't know.
We're better in maths, which is essential in lording over the nature and other human beings. I mean, I'm very good at maths, but most people I know don't like it much...
Anyway, the real problem is:
It has to be PLURAL. HorseS. A bunch of them. Or at least two. One horse won't do it!
[b]Zebonka12 wrote: [/b]
I've got a really good one but unfortunately "Chestnut Mare" doesn't have Horse in the title. Can I just say "Chestnut Horse"?
[/QUOTE]
Hahaha. No, it's using the name of the male to mean the female - sexism!
:op
*Note: Even though people here use the female term in a derogatory way, pretty much like "bitch" in English, but the problem is that there's already the equivalent of bitch in our language. There are so many ways of speaking about...women who are more tolerant regarding sex issues than the average:
Vaca! (Cow!)
Cadela! (Bitch!)
Égua! (Mare!)
And on and on...well, Brazil. lol
Well, I don't care as long as the fish are spared, really. Up until now, even though the average female fish is more licentious, people haven't coined here a derogatory expression based on it.
Though we're all animals...it's just that humans are conscious about moral rules they create through language and devised all kinds of ways of making, or trying to make, people accountable for their acts based on such rules, which we usually don't follow, I don't know.
We're better in maths, which is essential in lording over the nature and other human beings. I mean, I'm very good at maths, but most people I know don't like it much...
Anyway, the real problem is:
It has to be PLURAL. HorseS. A bunch of them. Or at least two. One horse won't do it!