So this classic rock station picks the #1 song to be the (un)official Dee-Jay smoke break song. I see things haven't changed much at the Rockin 104.3.
I really don't want to bother going past #13 to see if Queen made any other entries into a list of 1,043 top songs. Congrats to them for making it. Perhaps with those odds, The Final Countdown stands a chance...
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Getting off topic here Microwave...something I've been meaning to ask you... don't you think Delilah would cook much faster on "high??"
Just scanned the list quickly and [i]Under Pressure [/i]comes in at # 110.
Sorry, what's the point of this? Any list of "Top x" songs (other than Rolling Stone's) will have at least 5 % Queen songs, that's just a reflection of their popularity with the public.
[QUOTE]
[b]«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» wrote: [/b]
Getting off topic here Microwave...something I've been meaning to ask you... don't you think Delilah would cook much faster on "high??"
[/QUOTE]
But Delilah would get very dry around the edges. Of course if you used a microwave steamer, that would lock in the juices and all the nutrients and vitamins as well!!! Good point.
[b]«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» wrote: [/b]
Getting off topic here Microwave...something I've been meaning to ask you... don't you think Delilah would cook much faster on "high??"
[/QUOTE]
But Delilah would get very dry around the edges. Of course if you used a microwave steamer, that would lock in the juices and all the nutrients and vitamins as well!!! Good point.
I hate it how babyboomers pick these "best of all time" lists, but they choose to ignore everything that was done after 1980.
Then they pick to throw a U2 or Nirvana song in there just to show that the next generations haven't been ignored.
Then they pick to throw a U2 or Nirvana song in there just to show that the next generations haven't been ignored.
[QUOTE]
[b]Micrówave wrote: [/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» wrote: [/b]
Getting off topic here Microwave...something I've been meaning to ask you... don't you think Delilah would cook much faster on "high??"
[/QUOTE]
But Delilah would get very dry around the edges. Of course if you used a microwave steamer, that would lock in the juices and all the nutrients and vitamins as well!!! Good point.[/QUOTE]
Ahhh yes of course the steamer will do wonders...but please don't forget to season with lots of herbs and spices...that's the key to a good kitty roast!!
[b]Micrówave wrote: [/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» wrote: [/b]
Getting off topic here Microwave...something I've been meaning to ask you... don't you think Delilah would cook much faster on "high??"
[/QUOTE]
But Delilah would get very dry around the edges. Of course if you used a microwave steamer, that would lock in the juices and all the nutrients and vitamins as well!!! Good point.[/QUOTE]
Ahhh yes of course the steamer will do wonders...but please don't forget to season with lots of herbs and spices...that's the key to a good kitty roast!!