http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081228/ap_on_re_us/movie_noise_shooting;_ylt=AuPAAd2kruz1El2dU4MV9hQDW7oF
God bless America and the right to arms.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
I tend to find a simple "Excuse me, but would you mind keeping the noise down?" works for me, but each to their own.
If he'd only shared his popcorn.
:(
:(
"Let's see, do I have everything? Hmm... car keys, coat, ticket, money, pistol... yes I'm ready to go!"
What?
Abraham Lincoln's dead?
Abraham Lincoln's dead?
That's the best one yet!
[QUOTE]
[b]John S Stuart wrote: [/b]
What?
Abraham Lincoln's dead?[/QUOTE]
I suddenly had the eerie sensation that we might have ascribed the wrong motive to John Wilkes Booth all this time...
[b]John S Stuart wrote: [/b]
What?
Abraham Lincoln's dead?[/QUOTE]
I suddenly had the eerie sensation that we might have ascribed the wrong motive to John Wilkes Booth all this time...
[QUOTE]
[b]Zebonka12 wrote: [/b]
If he'd only shared his popcorn.
:(
[/QUOTE]
Actually, I think he's got the "popcorn trick" all wrong. "Gun" is a metaphor.
[b]Zebonka12 wrote: [/b]
If he'd only shared his popcorn.
:(
[/QUOTE]
Actually, I think he's got the "popcorn trick" all wrong. "Gun" is a metaphor.
[QUOTE]
[b]ThomasQuinn wrote:[/b]
I suddenly had the eerie sensation that we might have ascribed the wrong motive to John Wilkes Booth all this time...
[/QUOTE]
Perhaps he shouted 'Sic semper sonitus oris'!
[b]ThomasQuinn wrote:[/b]
I suddenly had the eerie sensation that we might have ascribed the wrong motive to John Wilkes Booth all this time...
[/QUOTE]
Perhaps he shouted 'Sic semper sonitus oris'!
Perhaps from now on when the messages appear on the screen about not making own sound effects and switching off mobile phones during the film, "please lay down your arms" will be tacked onto the end.
Grrr.....
Why is it always the stupidest among us that makes it on the news?
*grumbling*
Why is it always the stupidest among us that makes it on the news?
*grumbling*
[QUOTE]
[b]AspiringPhilosophe wrote: [/b]
Grrr.....
Why is it always the stupidest among us that makes it on the news?
*grumbling* [/QUOTE]
That might be something to do with the fact that "News Value" = "Sensation Value"...and has for several centuries, too.
[b]AspiringPhilosophe wrote: [/b]
Grrr.....
Why is it always the stupidest among us that makes it on the news?
*grumbling* [/QUOTE]
That might be something to do with the fact that "News Value" = "Sensation Value"...and has for several centuries, too.
[QUOTE]
[b]ThomasQuinn wrote: [/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]AspiringPhilosophe wrote: [/b]
Grrr.....
Why is it always the stupidest among us that makes it on the news?
*grumbling*
[/QUOTE]
That might be something to do with the fact that "News Value" = "Sensation Value"...and has for several centuries, too.
[/QUOTE]
Indeed. But is it so wrong to continue to wish for reason and logic to be injected into society at large? It's a pipe dream, I know, but I still wish for it.
[b]ThomasQuinn wrote: [/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]AspiringPhilosophe wrote: [/b]
Grrr.....
Why is it always the stupidest among us that makes it on the news?
*grumbling*
[/QUOTE]
That might be something to do with the fact that "News Value" = "Sensation Value"...and has for several centuries, too.
[/QUOTE]
Indeed. But is it so wrong to continue to wish for reason and logic to be injected into society at large? It's a pipe dream, I know, but I still wish for it.
[QUOTE]
[b]AspiringPhilosophe wrote: [/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]ThomasQuinn wrote: [/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]AspiringPhilosophe wrote: [/b]
Grrr.....
Why is it always the stupidest among us that makes it on the news?
*grumbling*
[/QUOTE]
That might be something to do with the fact that "News Value" = "Sensation Value"...and has for several centuries, too.
[/QUOTE]
Indeed. But is it so wrong to continue to wish for reason and logic to be injected into society at large? It's a pipe dream, I know, but I still wish for it.
[/QUOTE]
I'm for it, but so long as news services are (of necessity) motivated by a drive for profit and sheer numbers of readers/viewers/listeners, nothing will change there. Perhaps the internet will change something there in the long run, but I doubt it.
[b]AspiringPhilosophe wrote: [/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]ThomasQuinn wrote: [/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]AspiringPhilosophe wrote: [/b]
Grrr.....
Why is it always the stupidest among us that makes it on the news?
*grumbling*
[/QUOTE]
That might be something to do with the fact that "News Value" = "Sensation Value"...and has for several centuries, too.
[/QUOTE]
Indeed. But is it so wrong to continue to wish for reason and logic to be injected into society at large? It's a pipe dream, I know, but I still wish for it.
[/QUOTE]
I'm for it, but so long as news services are (of necessity) motivated by a drive for profit and sheer numbers of readers/viewers/listeners, nothing will change there. Perhaps the internet will change something there in the long run, but I doubt it.
[QUOTE]
[b]Freya is quietly judging you. wrote: [/b]
I tend to find a simple "Excuse me, but would you mind keeping the noise down?" works for me, but each to their own. [/QUOTE]
[b]Freya is quietly judging you. wrote: [/b]
I tend to find a simple "Excuse me, but would you mind keeping the noise down?" works for me, but each to their own. [/QUOTE]