[i]Yaaaaaaaawn!!!...boring toooo boring!!!!!.[/i]
Thread
Posts in chronological order
[i]Congratulations SirGH(AKA Mr-know-all)you and others wanted to preserve good standards and quality on the board,you finally got it!!!now we have Evan Porada´s important posts,The Archivist(whoever the fuck this person is)very long useless empty messages and many people that think that by attacking,insulting or giving quick answers to any thing here means they are better or deserve a high status(SIR...YOUR MAJESTY...YOUR HIGHTNESS).We can find very intelligent posts like "where is John Deacon?" and "Do you like Hot Space?".Each time a person uploads something the first post is usually for complaints,does the words "THANK YOU" exist on the board?I recall some years ago,it was plenty of things,I dowloaded at least 4 o 5 boots a week,you may remember this don´t you?,now we can find anything everywhere else cos if you consider this board as one of the best(it used t be one)it´s very far away from reality.Then came FLAC and it was the same,no stupid posts like "We should ban mp3 followers!!!" or ungratefull people,now everyone´s effort is not taking into account,this person is a newbie and posts 2 shows or 3 in FLAC,what he got was:"NO LINEAGE OR INFORMATION PROVIDED!" that´s not very motivating for uploading things here really,count how many things are uploaded....
PS:as I said if anyone wants something you can find me on the HUB,it´s easier and more peaceful place,I´m really fed up of certain people...ditto and good bye.[/i]
PS:as I said if anyone wants something you can find me on the HUB,it´s easier and more peaceful place,I´m really fed up of certain people...ditto and good bye.[/i]
[QUOTE]
[b]Sir GH wrote: [/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]L-R-TIGER1994 wrote: [/b]
[i]I was planning to share some new stuff(for ex:The Cross in Esslingen 88 and Osnabruck 88 in FLAC)but .....[/i]
[/QUOTE]
and...
>there´s always a complain "it´s incomplete" "there´s no linage" "there is a better version" "this and that" they want perfection and quality?
Hilarious.
We all bow down to your bounty and wisdom.
[/QUOTE]
Perhaps I should ask you to share the two Munic shows? I´m sure you have them, and know how it´s done right[img=/images/smiley/msn/wink_smile.gif][/img]
[b]Sir GH wrote: [/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]L-R-TIGER1994 wrote: [/b]
[i]I was planning to share some new stuff(for ex:The Cross in Esslingen 88 and Osnabruck 88 in FLAC)but .....[/i]
[/QUOTE]
and...
>there´s always a complain "it´s incomplete" "there´s no linage" "there is a better version" "this and that" they want perfection and quality?
Hilarious.
We all bow down to your bounty and wisdom.
[/QUOTE]
Perhaps I should ask you to share the two Munic shows? I´m sure you have them, and know how it´s done right[img=/images/smiley/msn/wink_smile.gif][/img]
[b]L-R-TIGER1994 wrote: [/b]
[i]Congratulations SirGH(AKA Mr-know-all)you and others wanted to preserve good standards and quality on the board,you finally got it!!!Each time a person uploads something the first post is usually for complaints,does the words "THANK YOU" exist on the board?I recall some years ago,it was plenty of things,I dowloaded at least 4 o 5 boots a week,you may remember this don´t you?,now we can find anything everywhere else cos if you consider this board as one of the best(it used t be one)it´s very far away from reality.Then came FLAC and it was the same,no stupid posts like "We should ban mp3 followers!!!" or ungratefull people,now everyone´s effort is not taking into account,this person is a newbie and posts 2 shows or 3 in FLAC,what he got was:"NO LINEAGE OR INFORMATION PROVIDED!" that´s not very motivating for uploading things here really,count how many things are uploaded....
I´m really fed up of certain people...ditto and good bye.[/i]
[/QUOTE]
2.nd Bob`s post. We bow down to your wisdom! Thanks to people like SirGH and his shares we get something we can call quality and the best version available. I could mention other people who share stuff, but it seems like you have an agenda against SirGH, so i only mentioned him. It`s really irritating to read all this stuff. You are the one who are ungrateful Tiger. BTW, you mentioned its so easy to get shows on other sites. Where have you lived the recent years, your summary just dont add up. Most of the shows which are shared elsewhere was first shared at QZ. Without QZ, the shares would not be available other places. QZ have never been one of the best when it comes to quality standards and your comments shows my point ( others will understand). You talk about effort....yeah, its really hard to dowload stuff from the HUB and then upload it here. Dont get me wrong, its OK that people does that, but i cant really call it a big effort. Im much more thankful to people who share their silvers, personal complications ( like SirGH and people like Pittrek have shared) and recordings members on this board have tried to improve with software. Now THAT takes an effort and those people who does this DO deserve to get credited.
Take the Drammen 82 bootleg. Everyone wanted it, but most people just wanted it because it was rare. When it was shared, it was mostly hit and run. Peronally, i used alot of effort to get a personal copy of this show. I had it before it was shared and then suddenly everyone had it. That was OK by me, but i get irritated when people want everything and when its finally shared....well, then its just another download and time to request a new one. Now THAT attitude is NOT something that motivate people to share stuff here.
Fed up...well, ditto to you....and goodbye.
A small editon: I see the Munich shows are request. So according to your summery, its more convenient to just share the HUB version than to perhaps get an better version from a genuine share which includes ripping, editing etc ? According to you, quality is not for people on this board, but only for the ones who trade and wants quality? I know i write difficult and not logical, but i just dont get where you are heading....
[i]Congratulations SirGH(AKA Mr-know-all)you and others wanted to preserve good standards and quality on the board,you finally got it!!!Each time a person uploads something the first post is usually for complaints,does the words "THANK YOU" exist on the board?I recall some years ago,it was plenty of things,I dowloaded at least 4 o 5 boots a week,you may remember this don´t you?,now we can find anything everywhere else cos if you consider this board as one of the best(it used t be one)it´s very far away from reality.Then came FLAC and it was the same,no stupid posts like "We should ban mp3 followers!!!" or ungratefull people,now everyone´s effort is not taking into account,this person is a newbie and posts 2 shows or 3 in FLAC,what he got was:"NO LINEAGE OR INFORMATION PROVIDED!" that´s not very motivating for uploading things here really,count how many things are uploaded....
I´m really fed up of certain people...ditto and good bye.[/i]
[/QUOTE]
2.nd Bob`s post. We bow down to your wisdom! Thanks to people like SirGH and his shares we get something we can call quality and the best version available. I could mention other people who share stuff, but it seems like you have an agenda against SirGH, so i only mentioned him. It`s really irritating to read all this stuff. You are the one who are ungrateful Tiger. BTW, you mentioned its so easy to get shows on other sites. Where have you lived the recent years, your summary just dont add up. Most of the shows which are shared elsewhere was first shared at QZ. Without QZ, the shares would not be available other places. QZ have never been one of the best when it comes to quality standards and your comments shows my point ( others will understand). You talk about effort....yeah, its really hard to dowload stuff from the HUB and then upload it here. Dont get me wrong, its OK that people does that, but i cant really call it a big effort. Im much more thankful to people who share their silvers, personal complications ( like SirGH and people like Pittrek have shared) and recordings members on this board have tried to improve with software. Now THAT takes an effort and those people who does this DO deserve to get credited.
Take the Drammen 82 bootleg. Everyone wanted it, but most people just wanted it because it was rare. When it was shared, it was mostly hit and run. Peronally, i used alot of effort to get a personal copy of this show. I had it before it was shared and then suddenly everyone had it. That was OK by me, but i get irritated when people want everything and when its finally shared....well, then its just another download and time to request a new one. Now THAT attitude is NOT something that motivate people to share stuff here.
Fed up...well, ditto to you....and goodbye.
A small editon: I see the Munich shows are request. So according to your summery, its more convenient to just share the HUB version than to perhaps get an better version from a genuine share which includes ripping, editing etc ? According to you, quality is not for people on this board, but only for the ones who trade and wants quality? I know i write difficult and not logical, but i just dont get where you are heading....
[QUOTE]
[b]L-R-TIGER1994 wrote: [/b]
[i]Each time a person uploads something the first post is usually for complaints,does the words "THANK YOU" exist on the board?
[/i]
[/QUOTE]
This thread should speak for itself: http://www.queenzone.com/queenzone/forumnew/forum_topic_view.aspx?Q=931884
>now we can find anything everywhere else
Yes, please tell us about all these great things you have found for free download that you were surely the first to stumble upon.
>cos if you consider this board as one of the best(it used t be one)it´s very far away from reality.
Nothing gets by you, does it?
>Then came FLAC and it was the same,no stupid posts like "We should ban mp3 followers!!!"
Yeah, stupid FLAC... this shift in mentality only gave us things like the new (and often master) tapes from Portland 74, Dallas 78, Vancouver 78, two nights in London 84, Manchester 86, etc. - but note that these tapers shared their material elsewhere, and not here... and you probably will never understand why.
Unearth a new thirty-year-old tape and then tell us you've done something worth reading about.
[b]L-R-TIGER1994 wrote: [/b]
[i]Each time a person uploads something the first post is usually for complaints,does the words "THANK YOU" exist on the board?
[/i]
[/QUOTE]
This thread should speak for itself: http://www.queenzone.com/queenzone/forumnew/forum_topic_view.aspx?Q=931884
>now we can find anything everywhere else
Yes, please tell us about all these great things you have found for free download that you were surely the first to stumble upon.
>cos if you consider this board as one of the best(it used t be one)it´s very far away from reality.
Nothing gets by you, does it?
>Then came FLAC and it was the same,no stupid posts like "We should ban mp3 followers!!!"
Yeah, stupid FLAC... this shift in mentality only gave us things like the new (and often master) tapes from Portland 74, Dallas 78, Vancouver 78, two nights in London 84, Manchester 86, etc. - but note that these tapers shared their material elsewhere, and not here... and you probably will never understand why.
Unearth a new thirty-year-old tape and then tell us you've done something worth reading about.
[QUOTE]
[b]FaBu wrote:[/b]
Perhaps I should ask you to share the two Munic shows? I´m sure you have them, and know how it´s done right[img=/images/smiley/msn/wink_smile.gif][/img]
[/QUOTE]
I have the first night from LP, but unfortunately it's lossy. But I've got a great copy of the second night, and gladly I'll share. I'll just need a day or two to get it all worked out.
See Tiger... it's as easy as that. But the funny thing is... even though you don't agree with the way people with quality standards conduct their business, I bet you'll be the first to download it without thanking the taper, the person who transferred it to digital, or the sharer. In fact, when I shared my compilation of the two copies of the Toronto 78 audience tape, your response was something to the effect of "same old shows over and over again"... that's rich, coming from someone who criticizes others for not thanking people for lossy or otherwise superfluous shares.
>ditto and good bye.
Don't slam the door on your way out.
[b]FaBu wrote:[/b]
Perhaps I should ask you to share the two Munic shows? I´m sure you have them, and know how it´s done right[img=/images/smiley/msn/wink_smile.gif][/img]
[/QUOTE]
I have the first night from LP, but unfortunately it's lossy. But I've got a great copy of the second night, and gladly I'll share. I'll just need a day or two to get it all worked out.
See Tiger... it's as easy as that. But the funny thing is... even though you don't agree with the way people with quality standards conduct their business, I bet you'll be the first to download it without thanking the taper, the person who transferred it to digital, or the sharer. In fact, when I shared my compilation of the two copies of the Toronto 78 audience tape, your response was something to the effect of "same old shows over and over again"... that's rich, coming from someone who criticizes others for not thanking people for lossy or otherwise superfluous shares.
>ditto and good bye.
Don't slam the door on your way out.
[i]List of shows that I´ve found OUTSIDE QZ:
Hamburg 82.
Phoenix 80.
Rio 85(second night).
Munich 86(second night).
Phoenix 77.
Wurzburg 82.
Berlin 84.
Sapporo 79(first night).
Munich 84.
Dortmund 84.
Paris 80.
Philadelphia 82.
Nagoya 85.
Zurich 80.
London 11-05-78.
Dortmund 82.
Cologne 82.
Oakland 82.
Berlin 80.
Barcelona 79(first night).
The Cross:
Osnabruck 88.
Mannheim 88.
Esslingen 88.
St Wendel 90.
Nuremberg 90.
most of the 98 Brian Tour..and so on.....
for the ones who care.meet you on the HUB.[/i]
Hamburg 82.
Phoenix 80.
Rio 85(second night).
Munich 86(second night).
Phoenix 77.
Wurzburg 82.
Berlin 84.
Sapporo 79(first night).
Munich 84.
Dortmund 84.
Paris 80.
Philadelphia 82.
Nagoya 85.
Zurich 80.
London 11-05-78.
Dortmund 82.
Cologne 82.
Oakland 82.
Berlin 80.
Barcelona 79(first night).
The Cross:
Osnabruck 88.
Mannheim 88.
Esslingen 88.
St Wendel 90.
Nuremberg 90.
most of the 98 Brian Tour..and so on.....
for the ones who care.meet you on the HUB.[/i]
[QUOTE]
[b]L-R-TIGER1994 wrote: [/b]
[i]Congratulations SirGH(AKA Mr-know-all)you and others wanted to preserve good standards and quality on the board,you finally got it!!!now we have Evan Porada´s important posts,The Archivist(whoever the fuck this person is)very long useless empty messages and many people that think that by attacking,insulting or giving quick answers to any thing here means they are better or deserve a high status(SIR...YOUR MAJESTY...YOUR HIGHTNESS).We can find very intelligent posts like "where is John Deacon?" and "Do you like Hot Space?".Each time a person uploads something the first post is usually for complaints,does the words "THANK YOU" exist on the board?I recall some years ago,it was plenty of things,I dowloaded at least 4 o 5 boots a week,you may remember this don´t you?,now we can find anything everywhere else cos if you consider this board as one of the best(it used t be one)it´s very far away from reality.Then came FLAC and it was the same,no stupid posts like "We should ban mp3 followers!!!" or ungratefull people,now everyone´s effort is not taking into account,this person is a newbie and posts 2 shows or 3 in FLAC,what he got was:"NO LINEAGE OR INFORMATION PROVIDED!" that´s not very motivating for uploading things here really,count how many things are uploaded....
PS:as I said if anyone wants something you can find me on the HUB,it´s easier and more peaceful place,I´m really fed up of certain people...ditto and good bye.[/i][/QUOTE]
Are we [b]really[/b] having this argument again? Tiger, if you're unhappy with the way the website works then just leave or here;s an idea - shut up complaining and try to do something about it?
Frankly I can't see how you can possibly be taking swipes at Sir GH - he's done far more for to preserve and promote quality and to put rare gigs into the fans hands than you ever have. And, frankly, resorting to cheap insults the way you have says a hell of a lot more about you than it does about the person you're trying to insult.
[b]L-R-TIGER1994 wrote: [/b]
[i]Congratulations SirGH(AKA Mr-know-all)you and others wanted to preserve good standards and quality on the board,you finally got it!!!now we have Evan Porada´s important posts,The Archivist(whoever the fuck this person is)very long useless empty messages and many people that think that by attacking,insulting or giving quick answers to any thing here means they are better or deserve a high status(SIR...YOUR MAJESTY...YOUR HIGHTNESS).We can find very intelligent posts like "where is John Deacon?" and "Do you like Hot Space?".Each time a person uploads something the first post is usually for complaints,does the words "THANK YOU" exist on the board?I recall some years ago,it was plenty of things,I dowloaded at least 4 o 5 boots a week,you may remember this don´t you?,now we can find anything everywhere else cos if you consider this board as one of the best(it used t be one)it´s very far away from reality.Then came FLAC and it was the same,no stupid posts like "We should ban mp3 followers!!!" or ungratefull people,now everyone´s effort is not taking into account,this person is a newbie and posts 2 shows or 3 in FLAC,what he got was:"NO LINEAGE OR INFORMATION PROVIDED!" that´s not very motivating for uploading things here really,count how many things are uploaded....
PS:as I said if anyone wants something you can find me on the HUB,it´s easier and more peaceful place,I´m really fed up of certain people...ditto and good bye.[/i][/QUOTE]
Are we [b]really[/b] having this argument again? Tiger, if you're unhappy with the way the website works then just leave or here;s an idea - shut up complaining and try to do something about it?
Frankly I can't see how you can possibly be taking swipes at Sir GH - he's done far more for to preserve and promote quality and to put rare gigs into the fans hands than you ever have. And, frankly, resorting to cheap insults the way you have says a hell of a lot more about you than it does about the person you're trying to insult.
[QUOTE]
[b]L-R-TIGER1994 wrote: [/b]
[i]List of shows that I´ve found OUTSIDE QZ:[/i]
[/QUOTE]
Congratulations, you found a lot of stuff that's commonly available... just not here.
Tell me, what exactly have you given back to the world of collecting that has given so much to you? I'm talking about tracking down new recordings that 99% of collectors haven't heard before, so re-sharing things here or in the hub doesn't count. So in other words, since the answer to that question is precisely "zero", the question is therefore revised to... what in your ungrateful and clearly mean-spirited mind warrants your lashing out against contributing members?
And on top of that, what in your mind is somehow convinced that lashing out against these kinds of people will actually spawn new recordings? Or are you one of those people who thinks new recordings magically fall out of the sky, i.e. not considering the process that gets the recording from the concert venue to you to point, click, and download ?
[b]L-R-TIGER1994 wrote: [/b]
[i]List of shows that I´ve found OUTSIDE QZ:[/i]
[/QUOTE]
Congratulations, you found a lot of stuff that's commonly available... just not here.
Tell me, what exactly have you given back to the world of collecting that has given so much to you? I'm talking about tracking down new recordings that 99% of collectors haven't heard before, so re-sharing things here or in the hub doesn't count. So in other words, since the answer to that question is precisely "zero", the question is therefore revised to... what in your ungrateful and clearly mean-spirited mind warrants your lashing out against contributing members?
And on top of that, what in your mind is somehow convinced that lashing out against these kinds of people will actually spawn new recordings? Or are you one of those people who thinks new recordings magically fall out of the sky, i.e. not considering the process that gets the recording from the concert venue to you to point, click, and download ?
[QUOTE]
[b]YourValentine wrote: [/b]
Hello ryou_akipe
Please go to
[url=http://www.thequeenhub.tk/]http://www.thequeenhub.tk/[/url]
and click on [b]join
[/b]
Enter a nick name, password, country, city and email address and how many Gigabytes Queen stuff you can share. (you should share 2 Gigabytes)
Click on [b]submit
[/b]
It can take about 2 weeks until you get a confirmation email, please check your spam filter. If you have problems, please search for Masahiko, a Japanese user who is in the hub and can help you. Send him a private message. I hope that helps.
See you soon in the hub:)
[/QUOTE]
Hello YourValentine .Thank you for detailed explanation of HUB . The account of HUB is acquired like your explanation. Thank you really for this time.
[b]YourValentine wrote: [/b]
Hello ryou_akipe
Please go to
[url=http://www.thequeenhub.tk/]http://www.thequeenhub.tk/[/url]
and click on [b]join
[/b]
Enter a nick name, password, country, city and email address and how many Gigabytes Queen stuff you can share. (you should share 2 Gigabytes)
Click on [b]submit
[/b]
It can take about 2 weeks until you get a confirmation email, please check your spam filter. If you have problems, please search for Masahiko, a Japanese user who is in the hub and can help you. Send him a private message. I hope that helps.
See you soon in the hub:)
[/QUOTE]
Hello YourValentine .Thank you for detailed explanation of HUB . The account of HUB is acquired like your explanation. Thank you really for this time.
Turning, Turning,...and turning again ( Zappa )
Same old story over and over again.
My proposition is:
3 Upload sections:
[b]Videos, DVDs[/b] etc.
The upload MUST AT LEAST contain:
Venue, Date, LIneage if possible, video details, like Bitrate, PAL/NTSC, audio details like LPCM, AC3, etc.,
Tracklist.
Any comments are welcome but no MUST
[b]
Audio CDs[/b] etc.
flac only uploads ( yes SIr, its me who proposes that ) The upload MUST AT LEAST contain all the relevant details.Tracklist, Lineage, Bitrate...Any comments are welcome but no MUST.
A kind of [b]Lossy section[/b], can´t find a fitting name.
Here every MP3 fan can upload his stuff. MP3 only allowed, if there is no lossless copy upped yet.
Here you should also be able to find (obviously) lossy videos in MPG, MOV. or Ipod files etc.
These restrictions work very well on other trackers, but as long as the site owner seems to ignore these reduntant discussions like in this thread, it will be like Zappa said.
And Sir I-know-it-all:
Have you ever counted the years, how long this stupid discussion goes? It must be 6/7 years.
And last not least, can somebody answer me a few questions:
[i]I know this question doesn´t belong into this thread, but I feel like asking them right here[/i].
Did the famous Queenarchivist ever give answers to following questions.
(I don´t read the discussion forum very often for obvious reasons) :
In 2002 we expected a Box containing 4 single Boxsets. Is the latest Box release the poor result after 6 years?
Will there ever be a chance to BUY Hammersmith 75/79, Earls Court, Houston?
And:
There MUST be excellent copies from at least 3 shows, not completely circulated yet:
(maybe hoarded by some [i]I-know-it-all[/i])
Munich 78
Rainbow 31.3.1974
Rock in Rio complete 1985
I´m sure, there exists not only a proshot of 2 songs like on Jap. Jewels
Rainbow 31.3.1974 is also a proshot. All the preparations to do a proshot, were surely not done to take just 2 tracks.
I just bought a copy of Rio complete from Trancer, either it was a 20 gen copy from the master or the guy who stole the tape didn´t know how to copy correctly. In the last case there will be no chance for a good copy, in the first case: C´mon people: Get your asses going...like Freddie used to say, and give it to the Queen world.
Same old story over and over again.
My proposition is:
3 Upload sections:
[b]Videos, DVDs[/b] etc.
The upload MUST AT LEAST contain:
Venue, Date, LIneage if possible, video details, like Bitrate, PAL/NTSC, audio details like LPCM, AC3, etc.,
Tracklist.
Any comments are welcome but no MUST
[b]
Audio CDs[/b] etc.
flac only uploads ( yes SIr, its me who proposes that ) The upload MUST AT LEAST contain all the relevant details.Tracklist, Lineage, Bitrate...Any comments are welcome but no MUST.
A kind of [b]Lossy section[/b], can´t find a fitting name.
Here every MP3 fan can upload his stuff. MP3 only allowed, if there is no lossless copy upped yet.
Here you should also be able to find (obviously) lossy videos in MPG, MOV. or Ipod files etc.
These restrictions work very well on other trackers, but as long as the site owner seems to ignore these reduntant discussions like in this thread, it will be like Zappa said.
And Sir I-know-it-all:
Have you ever counted the years, how long this stupid discussion goes? It must be 6/7 years.
And last not least, can somebody answer me a few questions:
[i]I know this question doesn´t belong into this thread, but I feel like asking them right here[/i].
Did the famous Queenarchivist ever give answers to following questions.
(I don´t read the discussion forum very often for obvious reasons) :
In 2002 we expected a Box containing 4 single Boxsets. Is the latest Box release the poor result after 6 years?
Will there ever be a chance to BUY Hammersmith 75/79, Earls Court, Houston?
And:
There MUST be excellent copies from at least 3 shows, not completely circulated yet:
(maybe hoarded by some [i]I-know-it-all[/i])
Munich 78
Rainbow 31.3.1974
Rock in Rio complete 1985
I´m sure, there exists not only a proshot of 2 songs like on Jap. Jewels
Rainbow 31.3.1974 is also a proshot. All the preparations to do a proshot, were surely not done to take just 2 tracks.
I just bought a copy of Rio complete from Trancer, either it was a 20 gen copy from the master or the guy who stole the tape didn´t know how to copy correctly. In the last case there will be no chance for a good copy, in the first case: C´mon people: Get your asses going...like Freddie used to say, and give it to the Queen world.
[QUOTE]
[b]frank39 wrote: [/b]
And Sir I-know-it-all:
Have you ever counted the years, how long this stupid discussion goes? It must be 6/7 years.
[/QUOTE]
Why are you addressing me with such a condescending tone, as if I'm the only person who has initiated/engaged in such a discussion?
Sure, I get into the discussions, but I don't except anything to change here. At most, I often find certain people's replies and attitudes amusing or revealing in some way, but in the long run I really don't care that much...
[b]frank39 wrote: [/b]
And Sir I-know-it-all:
Have you ever counted the years, how long this stupid discussion goes? It must be 6/7 years.
[/QUOTE]
Why are you addressing me with such a condescending tone, as if I'm the only person who has initiated/engaged in such a discussion?
Sure, I get into the discussions, but I don't except anything to change here. At most, I often find certain people's replies and attitudes amusing or revealing in some way, but in the long run I really don't care that much...
I didn´t want to offend you, Sir.
If you felt like that, I say sorry. But still, your attidude is: " I know it all "
Anyway, lets stop it. I´d be much more interested in the answers to my questions.
If you know anything more about these three shows (all proshots), I´d be happy if you send me an email.
And last not least,
I can only advise everybody here on QZ, to have a look at the U2, Zappa, etc. fanpages.
And have a look at other torrent trackers. [b]In none of the popular trackers would it be possible to do such an upload like in this thread[/b]: [i]as requested by someone of you[/i]. [i]Queen Paris 1986. !!!!
[/i]What? Audio, DVD, MP3, MPG[i],? [/i]
And Barbara, your advise in this case is not really helpfull.
You seem o have a good contact to the QZ site owner, please ask him about this point.
Compared with Zappateers and others, this upload forum has become a kind of [i]Kindergarden[/i] meanwhile. ( right translation: Kindergaten>Kindergarden ??) Everybody can upload anything he wants. No infos. no tracklist, no lineage, no Bitrates, no audiocodecs, nothing.
I wonder how long this will go on.
If you felt like that, I say sorry. But still, your attidude is: " I know it all "
Anyway, lets stop it. I´d be much more interested in the answers to my questions.
If you know anything more about these three shows (all proshots), I´d be happy if you send me an email.
And last not least,
I can only advise everybody here on QZ, to have a look at the U2, Zappa, etc. fanpages.
And have a look at other torrent trackers. [b]In none of the popular trackers would it be possible to do such an upload like in this thread[/b]: [i]as requested by someone of you[/i]. [i]Queen Paris 1986. !!!!
[/i]What? Audio, DVD, MP3, MPG[i],? [/i]
And Barbara, your advise in this case is not really helpfull.
You seem o have a good contact to the QZ site owner, please ask him about this point.
Compared with Zappateers and others, this upload forum has become a kind of [i]Kindergarden[/i] meanwhile. ( right translation: Kindergaten>Kindergarden ??) Everybody can upload anything he wants. No infos. no tracklist, no lineage, no Bitrates, no audiocodecs, nothing.
I wonder how long this will go on.
[QUOTE]
[b]frank39 wrote: [/b]
I wonder how long this will go on.
[/QUOTE]
I guess forever
[b]frank39 wrote: [/b]
I wonder how long this will go on.
[/QUOTE]
I guess forever
[QUOTE]
[b]frank39 wrote: [/b]
I didn´t want to offend you, Sir.
If you felt like that, I say sorry. But still, your attidude is: " I know it all "
[/QUOTE]
And there should be nothing wrong with being openly knowledgeable on a subject. Let's suppose this was a topic about cooking. A chef posts his informed opinion on which spices should be used to perfect a certain dish, is refuted by someone with no expertise time and time again, and finally he resorts to some (admittedly fun) sarcasm. Instead of calling him a know-it-all at some point down the line, one should be wise enough to realize who's opinion is more credible from day one of the discussion. Myself, I'd be listening to the chef, not the person who gets his recipes from the boxes of microwavable dinners.
[b]frank39 wrote: [/b]
I didn´t want to offend you, Sir.
If you felt like that, I say sorry. But still, your attidude is: " I know it all "
[/QUOTE]
And there should be nothing wrong with being openly knowledgeable on a subject. Let's suppose this was a topic about cooking. A chef posts his informed opinion on which spices should be used to perfect a certain dish, is refuted by someone with no expertise time and time again, and finally he resorts to some (admittedly fun) sarcasm. Instead of calling him a know-it-all at some point down the line, one should be wise enough to realize who's opinion is more credible from day one of the discussion. Myself, I'd be listening to the chef, not the person who gets his recipes from the boxes of microwavable dinners.