STADIUM ROCK - 1982.10.24 Nishinomiya (Osaka) (Flac, rapidshare)
23 postsPage 2 of 2
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Queenrockyou · Member since
[QUOTE]
[b]riccardo wrote: [/b]
Thanks a lot Olivier.
I have only a little request: I'm looking for the artwork of the 2 disc version of "Stadium Rock". Do you have it? I tried on SirGH site but the scan isn't good.[/QUOTE]
Unfortunately not, I only have the 4CD edition.
Regards,
Olivier,
Belgium.
TimBHM · Member since
[QUOTE]
[b]Sir GH wrote: [/b]
It could just be two different rips... couldn't it?
[/QUOTE]
Shouldn't two rips of identical discs be identical? (assuming both rips produced no errors) Isn't it more likely that my 2 disc copy comes from the 2 disc re-issue from 2005?
The Real Wizard · Member since
[QUOTE]
[b]TimBHM wrote: [/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]Sir GH wrote: [/b]
It could just be two different rips... couldn't it?
[/QUOTE]
Shouldn't two rips of identical discs be identical? (assuming both rips produced no errors) Isn't it more likely that my 2 disc copy comes from the 2 disc re-issue from 2005?
[/QUOTE]
Different software can use different methods for ripping. Some programs will take 99.99% of the track, sometimes resulting in SBEs. That's why EAC is the standard for a good rip.
riccardo · Member since
[QUOTE]
[b]ruth.olivier wrote: [/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]riccardo wrote: [/b]
Thanks a lot Olivier.
I have only a little request: I'm looking for the artwork of the 2 disc version of "Stadium Rock". Do you have it? I tried on SirGH site but the scan isn't good.
[/QUOTE]
Unfortunately not, I only have the 4CD edition.
Regards,
Olivier,
Belgium.
[/QUOTE]
Ok Olivier. I'll download this big version :-)
Thanks.
TimBHM · Member since
[QUOTE]
[b]Sir GH wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]TimBHM wrote: [/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]Sir GH wrote: [/b]
It could just be two different rips... couldn't it?
[/QUOTE]
Shouldn't two rips of identical discs be identical? (assuming both rips produced no errors) Isn't it more likely that my 2 disc copy comes from the 2 disc re-issue from 2005?
[/QUOTE]
Different software can use different methods for ripping. Some programs will take 99.99% of the track, sometimes resulting in SBEs. That's why EAC is the standard for a good rip.
[/QUOTE]
Interesting... and another gap in my knowledge gets plugged. How depressing to find that all rips are not made equal (I had naively assumed that this was not the case) this makes the job of canonically identifying end-product recordings an even bigger nightmare than I had thought... [img=/images/smiley/msn/cry_smile.gif][/img]
Anyway, I went back and checked my documentation and the lineage I have for my existing copy is actually
so I guess it's no surprise - anything could have happened to the recording between the silvers and EAC... pooh.
Queenrockyou · Member since
[QUOTE]
[b]TimBHM wrote: [/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]Sir GH wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]TimBHM wrote: [/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]Sir GH wrote: [/b]
It could just be two different rips... couldn't it?
[/QUOTE]
Shouldn't two rips of identical discs be identical? (assuming both rips produced no errors) Isn't it more likely that my 2 disc copy comes from the 2 disc re-issue from 2005?
[/QUOTE]
Different software can use different methods for ripping. Some programs will take 99.99% of the track, sometimes resulting in SBEs. That's why EAC is the standard for a good rip.
[/QUOTE]
Interesting... and another gap in my knowledge gets plugged. How depressing to find that all rips are not made equal (I had naively assumed that this was not the case) this makes the job of canonically identifying end-product recordings an even bigger nightmare than I had thought... [img=/images/smiley/msn/cry_smile.gif][/img]
Anyway, I went back and checked my documentation and the lineage I have for my existing copy is actually
so I guess it's no surprise - anything could have happened to the recording between the silvers and EAC... pooh.
[/QUOTE]
Indeed, your files were in fact extracted from another CD, hence the CDR(x) ! Not directly from the source, but from the CD source, then from (an)other CD on which it has been copied to... so most probanly that gives some differences in the ffps.
It doesn't necessarily mean that something wrong was done to the files, just copied to CD several times but this doesn't affect the sound. Anyway, it can only be safer to get something directly from the source. That's why I prefer sharing direct rips, so that everybody has the same version in its collection, the most perfect one ! I am always unhappy to trade something from a bootleg but without a lineage or that having been copied several times before arriving to me...
