not EVERYTHING needs to be in fucking surround sound!
[/QUOTE]
No need to tell it to US :-)
Personally I ALWAYS listen to a stereo PCM track on a music DVD (if it has one).
I still think that a 5.1 mix is necessary to Star Wars, not to a rock concert recording
[/QUOTE]
This also has to do with an individual's appreciation for music. I myself enjoy better sound.
steven 35638 · Member since
[QUOTE]
[b]Steven wrote: [/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]pittrek wrote: [/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]Michael Allred wrote: [/b]
not EVERYTHING needs to be in fucking surround sound!
[/QUOTE]
No need to tell it to US :-)
Personally I ALWAYS listen to a stereo PCM track on a music DVD (if it has one).
I still think that a 5.1 mix is necessary to Star Wars, not to a rock concert recording
[/QUOTE]
This also has to do with an individual's appreciation for music. I myself enjoy better sound and can hear the incredible difference.
[/QUOTE]
The Real Wizard · Member since
[QUOTE]
[b]Steven wrote: [/b]
This also has to do with an individual's appreciation for music. I myself enjoy better sound and can hear the incredible difference.
[/QUOTE]
Fair enough. Most of us do have an appreciation for quality on some level. But if you had to choose between a mono DVD of a 1970s concert or no DVD, which would you choose.. ?!
Rick · Member since
A raw version will be released when Brian has kicked the bucket.
on my way up · Member since
Not releasing Hammy '79 is just an incredible blunder...
And don't tell me they can't because they haven't got the multitrack. Thin Lizzy didn't have a multitrack for their Live and dangerous DVD release and they even made a surround mix! ( they first postponed the release too but when they found the search didn't lead anywhere they did what they could with the stereotapes, with great result)
