Hyde Park 1976 - remaster

I just found this on youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvNLKQ7vd5I

what do you think about it?

Looks nice. Where can I get the whole thing ?

Now, I've seen them for sale before.. You know.. for 70 quid off an some unreliable website. As a burnt copy...

Yeah, we need some remasters from their earlier stuff. Y'know, back when they would play "White Queen" and "Liar" live.

Hello People
I know that I'm not  a profesional, after all the project, I realized that it loosed video quality (because the only effect to delete the logos only works  in virtualdub -avi- and my scarce know-how of formats, sorry), if it doesn't matter to you, i could upload it (torrent). it will be my first "upload" and my christmas gift .
you can take a look my restoration work:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xH45KmBlAC8
and if in spite of all you want it, i'll upload it

Sorry, my english is bad

Hey Carlos, how did you "stabilize" the video ?
I tried several VirtualDub filters but none of them worked so good as yours

[QUOTE]





[b]pittrek wrote: [/b]



Hey Carlos, how did you "stabilize" the video ?
I tried several VirtualDub filters but none of them worked so good as yours

[/QUOTE]
same question here, was it perhaps the deshaker "Guth" plugin?

Hello People

For the first part of the concert I used prodad mercalli  because the video was very inestable, in parts with damage tape, I removed it, but i saw, after the render,  the video turns to a little blur (maybe i don't use well) , so i decided use the filter  only for that part, the rest of the video i do by myself, manually.

To be honest. We will only see/hear a noticeable improvement when a lower generation tape pops up one day.

The one we've got is already pretty low generation.  The video quality is generally great.  The issue is the audio, which is taken from the video feed... it's a horrible mix, among other issues.  Therefore, chances are the major upgrade will only come if the show is officially released some day.

Hmm, I still think the video quality is below average. Very dark, blurry colours.

Ok, that means you don`t like it, no problem i did it for my own use, i know that is not good at all, but i said that i'm not a profesional remastering videos, i like edit videos, but i don`t consider myself good in this, also i said that i loosed quality, and explain why. i hope someone take my idea, with better quality results in a low generation tape.  So i keep it for my own use [img=/images/smiley/msn/wink_smile.gif][/img]

Grettings
Carlos

It has nothing to do with liking it or not. It's just that so little can be done about such a bad bootleg video. You may remaster it as much as you like, of course.

It looks nice. I think you did a great job. It would be great if you share it here in QZ.
I got the SnowProductions version so I think this would be an improvement, at least of the video editing. It's the best we can get until a low generation tape come to us, at least until Pittrek do the same that you did (video stabilization, replacement of damaged video, etc).

Carlos Rivera wrote: Hello People
I know that I'm not  a profesional, after all the project, I realized that it loosed video quality (because the only effect to delete the logos only works  in virtualdub -avi- and my scarce know-how of formats, sorry), if it doesn't matter to you, i could upload it (torrent). it will be my first "upload" and my christmas gift .
you can take a look my restoration work:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xH45KmBlAC8
and if in spite of all you want it, i'll upload it

Sorry, my english is bad

===============================================================================================
I believe that you did fine  work to make this concert a little bit better. Another would be the best quality audio and can show QPL how  work are not professionals but true fans of Queen

I would not mind to see your version of this concert