I tried to add pre-Deacon bassists to wikipedia's Queen page, but some retard always removes them.
Any tips how to make them stay there ? :-) Or how to contact the retards removing them ? :-)
Thread
Posts in chronological order
It's probably John Deacon. He doesn't have much else to do these days.
I wouldn't bother; the whole article is terrible and needs to be re-written anyway.
You shouldn't talk to web-tards.
Oh wait...
Oh wait...
Why do you think that nice people of QZ know contacts of retards?
Wikipedia editors are bunch of idiots
These names are always being removed from this
list because they are not relevant
Serry... wrote:
Why do you think that nice people of QZ know contacts of retards?
1. Because we talk to Treasure Moment. Some have even clicked onto their MySpace page.
2. The recent rash of "Did Freddie ever..." threads
3. And you, sir, won't even hand out a couch for William Mahler to sleep on!!!
Would "they"accept the data if you provide the source of your information i.e. put a bibliograhic note to the names of the bass players ?
tcc wrote:
Would "they"accept the data if you provide the source of your information i.e. put a bibliograhic note to the names of the bass players ?
I hope so. I think that those guys really deserve to be in the Queen article. I will try to do it so when I have time for searching for "reliable sources"
LOL
Wikipedia has no sense of humour.
They kept removing my hyperlink on Brian May's article when I tried to link the "39th" in the bit "He was ranked 39th in Rolling Stone magazine's list of the '100 Greatest Guitarists of All Time'" to the wikipedia article on "'39"
They kept removing my hyperlink on Brian May's article when I tried to link the "39th" in the bit "He was ranked 39th in Rolling Stone magazine's list of the '100 Greatest Guitarists of All Time'" to the wikipedia article on "'39"