Archivist has no credability so shut the f*** up

this letter has taken me all night to write. do not shoot me down and listen to my point first.
over the past three days i have been reading the official archivists mails and this is what i think. Iv put greigs words in bold.
he is a liar (to brians wig [b]NOT THE RUSHES. WE ONLY TRANSFERRED THEM RECENTLY SO IT WAS IMPOSSIBLE TO VIEW THEM BEFORE RECENTLY[/b]) he is sexist (to Holly2003 [b]Is it classy or elegant when girls swear like old washer women??[/b] ), he is a homophoabe (to john stuart [b]many things will come out before Anthology does. John Stuart being one of them[/b]).
he cherrypicks his answers ([b]would you agree with me that quoting the bible on this forum, and/or anywhere else, is decidedly disagreeable?)[/b] while at the same time he igonroes the main point of the question (John stuart - [b][i]thanks [/i][/b][b][i]for that. I wonder if GB will now apologise to you?[/i] I seem to recall from childhood it was Jesus who reported[/b]) and he aviods serious answers. he claims it is part of his job to ([b]dangle carrots.  This, you see, is also a small part of the job; to whet appetites in subtle ways. Get people talking about Queen product, and this certainly happens, especially if I put a spin on it, or make it controvercial in some way[/b]) but confessess there is very little in the archives anyway ([b]rare session recordings, alternate takes, discarded ideas, studio banter, unreleased interviews and footage, remixes and ext versions that were never issued (not that there's many),
[/b]so my bottome line is this he is a wind up merchant.
he has no credability his reputation is in tatters.
he is a liar who will not admit when he is caught out, and he is also lying about the archives.
he delights in slagging queenzones off and deliberately tries to sabbotage queenzone goodwill.
Someone else wrote more goodstuff has come outside him than from him and that includes a straight answer.

this is not in the wrong forum.
how more serious can it get?
this man is an unemployed lying chav who can only take the piss out of everyone and everything and you all let him off with it because you think he he is something special. and hes not.
See through him.

http://rapidshare.com/files/354147941/GB2008.mp3

We have just finished one round of huffing and puffing.  Do you want to start going round the mulberry bush again ?

Yes he could still be dangling a carrot but how can we be sure what he said won't come true ?  It will not cost us anything to give him the benefit of the doubt.

but hes the one thats been doing all the huffing and puffing and it costs him nothing to be civil. and its not up to him anyway if things get out or not. Thats how he keeps wiinning because he plays on peoples fears. Be nice to grieg or else. tell him to f*** off and that will stop me getting rare stuff.
who is the bigger fool. especially as there is little rare to get worried about.
[b](rare session recordings, alternate takes, discarded ideas, studio banter, unreleased interviews and footage, remixes and ext versions that were never issued (not that there's many),[/b]

He is a chav with no say.and i say its time he f***** off and stuck his carrot up his a***.

WilliamFraser the Greg brooks discussion died down, all this will do is fuel the fire. Your points are very valid and many other people feel the same way as you do, but posting this will only make him reply and upset you, causing you to reply, causing him to do THE CAPS…. Eventually making Greg make 3 new topics, which will make microwave post 3 new topics to parody Gregs…. And so on and so fourth.

so he gets freedom to write what he wants but i can't say he has no credability.
what happened to my freedom of speech.
Greig wont answer this cos he cant. he will ignore it or attack me. but he can attack me all he likes. i dont care thats called discrediting a witness. thats the point.
he can call me anything he likes. he can attack me all he can. he can attack the zone all he wants. but i still see whats going on. Yes I am a chav. but at least i admit it and so should he. he is the worst thing that has ever happened on here and people should not be afraid to call himm out.


[QUOTE]

 



[b]emrabt wrote: [/b]



WilliamFraser the Greg brooks discussion died down, all this will do is fuel the fire. Your points are very valid and many other people feel the same way as you do, but posting this will only make him reply and upset you, causing you to reply, causing him to do THE CAPS…. Eventually making Greg make 3 new topics, which will make microwave post 3 new topics to parody Gregs…. And so on and so fourth.

[/QUOTE]

Right, I’ll leave you to make a big attention grabbing scene with lots of swearing, now that will get your point across AND make you look better than Greg, because being hypocritcal is awesome.

OK. ive cut the swearing out. is that better.

[QUOTE]

[b]emrabt wrote: [/b]

Right, I’ll leave you to make a big attention grabbing scene with lots of swearing, now that will get your point across AND make you look better than Greg, because being hypocritcal is awesome.
[/QUOTE]

I posted something similar a few years ago only to receive an abusive e-mail from 'Greg'. It has always been my opinion that 'Queen' would be fairly horrified to know that one of their representatives was behaving such a way online. Also, being a member of a fairly successful band myself, I know that inner circle members have to be careful about what they say. Anybody working for my band posting what 'Greg' does online would probably be not looked on too well.Although, the honest answer I think is to believe what you want to about online identities and try not to get drawn into such discussions (although I am by posting this). The Queen Archivist may well be Greg Brooks. Who knows? If so, fair enough. I find some of his posts informative and some quite amusing. [/QUOTE]

It took you all night to write that letter?

Click. What else is on? Oooooh, the fishing channel! Much more interesting than this garbage.
[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]V.[/QUOTE] [/QUOTE]

Question: Why do people even bother to asterisk up their cuss words online? We all know what's behind those *'s
Fuck fuck fuckity fuck-fuck-fuck!

[QUOTE]

[b]inu-liger wrote: [/b]

Question: Why do people even bother to asterisk up their cuss words online? We all know what's behind those *'s
[b]Fuck fuck fuckity fuck-fuck-fuck!
[/b][/QUOTE]
hahahhahahaha !!! bravo !!!

So booooriiiiiiiing.
Get a life and leave the guy alone :(
Don't you like his threads ? Don't read them, it's THAT easy

**** ** ****** *** * ***** *** *** ***** ** ********.

[QUOTE]

[b]pittrek wrote: [/b]

So booooriiiiiiiing.
Get a life and leave the guy alone :(
Don't you like his threads ? Don't read them, it's THAT easy
[/QUOTE] I don't think it is [i][b]that[/b][/i] easy, but I do take your point.