Skip to content
Queen crest Queenzone.org

Organ in Father To Son ???

17 posts
Thread

Posts in chronological order

Search forum

Sign in to watch

Watching a topic is how you opt in to reply pushes.

I just read from somewhere that Queen used an organ in Father To Son (and even in The Loser In The End).
True or false???

I listened to those tracks and tried to hear organ playing but I didn't notice.


What do you think?
I haven't heard it for a while, but there might be. Who knows. They've used 'em in the 70s. They arn't synths, so it's okay in Queen's book.
"Please buy my upcoming album... I need the money"
I only hear an organ in "Liar".
It's probably the Red Special you are hearing.

I hear no organ in any Queen song in the 70s....
They did use an organ on those tracks but it's a little further back in the mix. You can hear it a little more in Loser in the End though.
Liar has organ, so does Now I'm Here and so do Wedding March and Under Pressure in the 80's. No more Queen tracks feature organ.

Father to Son is a combination of piano and guitars playing unison. Loser in the End has a phased distorted guitar. I know I did claim earlier that it was an organ, but I was wrong.
John hated Hot Space. Frederick's favourite singer was not Paul Rodgers. Roger didn't compose 'Innuendo.' 'Bohemian Rhapsody' hasn't got 180 vocal overdubs.
No sinths were used until The Game album.

All you hear are multi-layered harmonies from the Red Special. Nothing else.


Jazz 78 wrote:

They did use an organ on those tracks but it's a little further back in the mix. You can hear it a little more in Loser in the End though.

Can you prove it was an organ?  Maybe it was a piano with the "Red Special" treatment.





> No sinths were used until The Game album.

An organ's not a synth.

> All you hear are multi-layered harmonies from the Red Special. Nothing else.

Not 'all you hear'. A lot of the 'synth-like' effects come from other instruments: piano, bass, drums, organ, harpsichord, stylophone, different guitars, percussion, reversed stuff, e-drums, etc. The Red Special generated a lot of the no-synth effects, but not all of them.
John hated Hot Space. Frederick's favourite singer was not Paul Rodgers. Roger didn't compose 'Innuendo.' 'Bohemian Rhapsody' hasn't got 180 vocal overdubs.


Sebastian wrote:

> No sinths were used until The Game album.

An organ's not a synth.

> All you hear are multi-layered harmonies from the Red Special. Nothing else.

Not 'all you hear'. A lot of the 'synth-like' effects come from other instruments: piano, bass, drums, organ, harpsichord, stylophone, different guitars, percussion, reversed stuff, e-drums, etc. The Red Special generated a lot of the no-synth effects, but not all of them.

absolutely, as said before queen used combinations of genuine instruments to produced "compounded" sounds...kinda what synthesisers did.
liar is a great example of use of organ, and Fairy fella is a good example of harpischord...there are others - but not lots.

although if we want to be extremely literal queen did break their own rule by using a "synthesiser" before The Game. the "vocal orchestrations of woodwind/brass" on ANATO are i believ the "old trick" of using a comb like a kazoo... sythesis is the reproduction of soemthing using non-original or faked means.....these sounds were synthesised.



go deo na hÉireann The best QZ epoch: BG17-00 (Before Gerry 1996-2013)
If so, guitar pedals would also be synths, as would prepared pianos, EQ'd basses, compressed vocals, etc.

So no: in terms of using keyboard electronic synthesisers, the band only started in 1979. Before that, they used a variety of instruments, none of which was actually a synthesiser (maybe a stylophone could be a grey area there). Organs aren't synths, harpsichords aren't synths, e-pianos aren't synths, jangle pianos aren't synths.
John hated Hot Space. Frederick's favourite singer was not Paul Rodgers. Roger didn't compose 'Innuendo.' 'Bohemian Rhapsody' hasn't got 180 vocal overdubs.
i agree you are right, but the point i was making was that the "ANATO vocal orchestrations" were not genuine. they were synthesised...albeit by very basic child-like means, but synthesised just the same.
if you made a "duck quack" on record by any means other than using a recording of a duck, then it's synthesised.

usually a guitar pedal still produces a sound that you can recognise as being played on a guitar, in much the same way as keyboard (synths) sound like keyboards no matter what when reproducing guitar sounds.

guitars a usually played to make new guitar sounds, not impersonate other instruments - that's what synths are for. there are exceptions - Boston used a couple of " tricks" with a Vox and a Rockman on "third stage", so i suppose i contradict myself a little - guitars can be used as synths

oh fuck knows, i confuse myself now
go deo na hÉireann The best QZ epoch: BG17-00 (Before Gerry 1996-2013)
The difference between a synthesiser and another instrument is not whether they emulate other instruments or not (think about the 'sitarised' guitar in Jealousy or the 'clarinet' in Good Company) but the way they work.

Queen were adamant to clear up that none of their effects (up until 'Races', that is) had been created through Moog's, but instead using other means (prepared piano, harpsichord, e-piano, organ, guitar choirs, compressed vocals, vocal onomatopoeias, reversed rolls, flanged cymbals, etc.) which were more 'human' and relied more on craftsmanship than on pressing keys and manipulating waves.

For 'News' and 'Jazz' they didn't specify whether they'd used synths or not, and for 'The Game' they credited the OBX. The rest is history.
John hated Hot Space. Frederick's favourite singer was not Paul Rodgers. Roger didn't compose 'Innuendo.' 'Bohemian Rhapsody' hasn't got 180 vocal overdubs.
"On the first day Pim & Niek created a heavenly occupation. Pim & Niek blessed it and named it 'Loosch'." (Genesis 1:1)

Sign in to reply