Donna, don't worry about not having read THE book, you will find it in your local charity shop before long. There is already a very good website out there, QueenConcerts. Great site. Congrats to whoever owns it.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
I agree with the previous poster. QueenConcerts.com makes Greg's book obsolete.
Maybe Mr. Scully should "compile" his info into the Ultimate Queen Concerts reference in printed form? :P
Nah, I know he's too busy to do that. I just meant to acknowledge the site's quality.
Maybe Mr. Scully should "compile" his info into the Ultimate Queen Concerts reference in printed form? :P
Nah, I know he's too busy to do that. I just meant to acknowledge the site's quality.
The thing which is really a shock horror is the fact that Greg doesn't respond anymore. I'm afraid he has scored an own goal with this topic.
He is scheduled to come back in 3 months' time.
emrabt wrote: Sebastian wrote: I don't see why you guys waste your time replying to this oaf.
THE FONZ Wrote:
can't someone ban him? He adds nothing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>..
What are you talking about, adds nothing?
Where else on Queenzone can I use my useless knowledge of law and trivial pursuit court cases?
=====
I believe he was refering to Greg Brooks rather than you.
THE FONZ Wrote:
can't someone ban him? He adds nothing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>..
What are you talking about, adds nothing?
Where else on Queenzone can I use my useless knowledge of law and trivial pursuit court cases?
=====
I believe he was refering to Greg Brooks rather than you.
ThomasQuinn wrote: emrabt wrote: Sebastian wrote: I don't see why you guys waste your time replying to this oaf.
THE FONZ Wrote:
can't someone ban him? He adds nothing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>..
What are you talking about, adds nothing?
Where else on Queenzone can I use my useless knowledge of law and trivial pursuit court cases?
=====
I believe he was refering to Greg Brooks rather than you.
//////////////////////////////////
Thomas, I guess he got it. He´s just saying he couldn´t use his knowledge of law in case the archivist was banned. So, yes, GB adds something.
THE FONZ Wrote:
can't someone ban him? He adds nothing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>..
What are you talking about, adds nothing?
Where else on Queenzone can I use my useless knowledge of law and trivial pursuit court cases?
=====
I believe he was refering to Greg Brooks rather than you.
//////////////////////////////////
Thomas, I guess he got it. He´s just saying he couldn´t use his knowledge of law in case the archivist was banned. So, yes, GB adds something.
I think the Queen archivist believes his three monthly tirades are some clever type of viral marketing.
[insert soothing harp music here]
This thread is absolutely ridiculous.
Well, the poster who started it is absolutely ridiculous, so there you have it.
It's shame that John Stuart has to put up with his behavior.
Gregsynth wrote: It's shame that John Stuart has to put up with his behavior.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed.