jamster1111
Ok i sent it!
Thread
Posts in chronological order
victor fleitas
Thank You Very Very Much!!! :)
Projector Freddie
haha. had no idea it was you :)
pittrek
The 2 live tracks sound amazing
Queenman!!
Adam Baboolal wrote: GinjaNinja wrote: The De Lane Lea demos are transferred from Brian's acetate, so that's why there is surface noise present.
While that was where I believed they came from, my point about why the noise is still there, stands. In this day and age, there are some wonderful denoising tools available, however, they chose not to alter them. I find it interesting, is all :)
Anyhoo, had a listen to all the previews and they generally sound very nice. But, for whatever reason, I wasn't "feeling" ANATO. I think it sounds a little withdrawn - a little quieter and less full sounding. Overall, I like the extra separation of the instruments I can hear. But heck, I am listening on my computer speakers, so maybe a trip to my studio will grant me a better listen!
Adam.
====================
It's says again something about the QP mentality.
While that was where I believed they came from, my point about why the noise is still there, stands. In this day and age, there are some wonderful denoising tools available, however, they chose not to alter them. I find it interesting, is all :)
Anyhoo, had a listen to all the previews and they generally sound very nice. But, for whatever reason, I wasn't "feeling" ANATO. I think it sounds a little withdrawn - a little quieter and less full sounding. Overall, I like the extra separation of the instruments I can hear. But heck, I am listening on my computer speakers, so maybe a trip to my studio will grant me a better listen!
Adam.
====================
It's says again something about the QP mentality.
Rick
This is definitely the best version of YTMBA. The quality is simply outstanding.
victor fleitas
On 39, In the middle part, from 1:50, roger voice turns completly different, I guess they did a overdubb there... they should have used the hole part of roger´s overdubb on that part. the change on his voice is too noticeable... anyways, his voice wasnt on top-notch on that day... :P
Anyways, is Amazing! and YTMBA, is simply Stunning...
Anyways, is Amazing! and YTMBA, is simply Stunning...
Bo Rhap
Those tracks sound absolutely fantastic.
On the evidence of these tracks,i would buy the first five albums.As if i needed an excuse.Now i'll have to get the money.
On the evidence of these tracks,i would buy the first five albums.As if i needed an excuse.Now i'll have to get the money.
Hangman_96
Thank you very much for the tracks! They sound amazingly awesome!
ploughman
victor fleitas wrote: "On 39, In the middle part, from 1:50, roger voice turns completly different, I guess they did a overdubb there... they should have used the hole part of roger´s overdubb on that part. the change on his voice is too noticeable... anyways, his voice wasnt on top-notch on that day... :P
Anyways, is Amazing! and YTMBA, is simply Stunning...
I HIGHLY doubt that it is an overdub. Overdub means, that Roger should have done in the studio this year or previous year and I dont think he still has that high falsetto."
--------------------------------
More likely it is flown from a different concert (maybe somewhere during the Live Killers tour) where they have multitracks.
OR It is don with studio tricjery by copy pasteing his voice on that part from some second before, applying some clever editing and pitch sifting...hence it sounds a bit different.
I don't really remember many concerts where Roger nailed the whole middle part of 39. It's a damn hard thing to produce live. I think even the Live Killers thing is a studio overdub, since he didn't nail it on the live bootleg (Frankfurt 1979 was it) where the recording comes from.
Anyways, is Amazing! and YTMBA, is simply Stunning...
I HIGHLY doubt that it is an overdub. Overdub means, that Roger should have done in the studio this year or previous year and I dont think he still has that high falsetto."
--------------------------------
More likely it is flown from a different concert (maybe somewhere during the Live Killers tour) where they have multitracks.
OR It is don with studio tricjery by copy pasteing his voice on that part from some second before, applying some clever editing and pitch sifting...hence it sounds a bit different.
I don't really remember many concerts where Roger nailed the whole middle part of 39. It's a damn hard thing to produce live. I think even the Live Killers thing is a studio overdub, since he didn't nail it on the live bootleg (Frankfurt 1979 was it) where the recording comes from.
DaveyLane
victor fleitas wrote: Hi! Id love if you send me those tracks to me too!!
Thankyou verey very very much!!! :)
lord_victor_fleitas@hotmail.com
May I also hear those tracks too?
daveylane@hotmail.com
Thankyou verey very very much!!! :)
lord_victor_fleitas@hotmail.com
May I also hear those tracks too?
daveylane@hotmail.com
jondickens1
sbazb
ploughman wrote: victor fleitas wrote: "On 39, In the middle part, from 1:50, roger voice turns completly different, I guess they did a overdubb there... they should have used the hole part of roger´s overdubb on that part. the change on his voice is too noticeable... anyways, his voice wasnt on top-notch on that day... :P
Anyways, is Amazing! and YTMBA, is simply Stunning...
I HIGHLY doubt that it is an overdub. Overdub means, that Roger should have done in the studio this year or previous year and I dont think he still has that high falsetto."
--------------------------------
More likely it is flown from a different concert (maybe somewhere during the Live Killers tour) where they have multitracks.
OR It is don with studio tricjery by copy pasteing his voice on that part from some second before, applying some clever editing and pitch sifting...hence it sounds a bit different.
I don't really remember many concerts where Roger nailed the whole middle part of 39. It's a damn hard thing to produce live. I think even the Live Killers thing is a studio overdub, since he didn't nail it on the live bootleg (Frankfurt 1979 was it) where the recording comes from.
-----------------
I don't think Roger's harmony in '39 at Earls Court is "flown in" from another concert. To me it sounds like there just some subtle mixing going on - When Roger is hitting the high notes he should be, he is slightly higher in the mix. When he's not hitting them or drifting off pitch, Freddie is slightly higher in the mix - It kind of creates the illusion that he sung the whole part perfectly because the mix is deliberately quite fluid - Can't really explain properly, but basically you become accustomed to hearing Roger's part of the harmony drifting past now and again and therefore expect his high notes to always be in there somewhere, when sometimes they're not. Listen carefully and see if you can see what I mean...
Anyways, is Amazing! and YTMBA, is simply Stunning...
I HIGHLY doubt that it is an overdub. Overdub means, that Roger should have done in the studio this year or previous year and I dont think he still has that high falsetto."
--------------------------------
More likely it is flown from a different concert (maybe somewhere during the Live Killers tour) where they have multitracks.
OR It is don with studio tricjery by copy pasteing his voice on that part from some second before, applying some clever editing and pitch sifting...hence it sounds a bit different.
I don't really remember many concerts where Roger nailed the whole middle part of 39. It's a damn hard thing to produce live. I think even the Live Killers thing is a studio overdub, since he didn't nail it on the live bootleg (Frankfurt 1979 was it) where the recording comes from.
-----------------
I don't think Roger's harmony in '39 at Earls Court is "flown in" from another concert. To me it sounds like there just some subtle mixing going on - When Roger is hitting the high notes he should be, he is slightly higher in the mix. When he's not hitting them or drifting off pitch, Freddie is slightly higher in the mix - It kind of creates the illusion that he sung the whole part perfectly because the mix is deliberately quite fluid - Can't really explain properly, but basically you become accustomed to hearing Roger's part of the harmony drifting past now and again and therefore expect his high notes to always be in there somewhere, when sometimes they're not. Listen carefully and see if you can see what I mean...
pittrek
'39 COMES FROM A DIFFERENT NIGHT ! It's not coming from the FIRST night, it's coming from the SECOND night at Earls Court :-) It was discussed here already :-)
sbazb
Yes, I know it's from a different night :). I was responding to the people claiming that Roger's vocal has been digitally manipulated or "flown in" from another concert - I don't think that's the case, there is just some subtle mixing going on to make it seem like he hits all the notes, when he didn't in reality. If you listen carefully you can hear him tailing off and Freddie's voice becoming higher in the mix. I don't think he ever hit all the high notes live in that part of '39, but I'm prepared to be proven wrong...