Queen crest Queenzone

New Wembley DVD opinions?

48 posts Page 4 of 4
Thread

Posts in chronological order

· Member since
@brianswig

I understand what you are sayinng about the film quality/type, i did not know the wording for it

I posted on another thread but i will repeat myself here, i was very impressed and i like the rawness of freddies voice in places and the very close up shots of Roger!!
· Member since
I prefer the film quality, from my point of view is a lot better than the videotape, Wembley Friday look like an amateur multicam made by fans nowdays, and is a shame because is a very good gig. But Montreal looks like if the gig was recorded just yesterday, If they only record Wembley like Montreal... Gavin Taylor is a great director but his cameras were shit...
Queen made Wembley his emblem (but from my point of view, Budapest is a more important gig) so a good quality of the gig is important.
Well, in 1986 Queen made the greatest and biggest gigs in Europe, and maybe in the world, and they were a very rich band, the could film properly, in 35 mm film, their biggest gigs (Wembley, Slane, Knebworth, Mannheim...) But they didn't
Thanks to God we have Budapest!
· Member since
I'm going to buy this when it gets released in the US, but going off Youtube--I can say that this Friday concert trumps the second night by MILES! Everybody sounds more relaxed, Freddie's having a ball throughout the show (and sounds good), and the stage banter during the acoustic section is funny!

What I love about this concert is that it's also very "legit." Unlike the second night, Freddie's vocals aren't freaking overdubbed on half the songs! The only differences I can hear between this, and the bootleg, is that there's some minor pitch/note correction on a few songs--but nothing was overdubbed. The only true overdubs are some of Brian's guitar solos--that's it.
I always knew I was a star And now, the rest of the world seems to agree with me-Freddie Mercury