Freddie Mercury's HIV Diagnosis – Some Insight – 1985 to 1987

apart from the inaccuracies/dispute in your statement. please STOP shouting

[QUOTE] [b]brENsKi wrote:[/b]

apart from the inaccuracies/dispute in your statement. please STOP shouting[/QUOTE]


Hiv is the diagnosis (not scientifically proven to cause aids by the way)
Aids the symptom
azt causes cancer, which destroys the immune system
california by law banned azt from being disposed into the states water supply because it causes cancer they stated that as the reason
all verifiable facts.

AIDS is NOT the symptom. AIDS is what has happened to the immune system - it's a SYNDROME
that is used to define the "collection of one or more symptoms" that manifest once the syndrome
has taken hold...ie
the sarcomas,secondary viruses, broken bones, blindness etc etc

[QUOTE] [b]brENsKi wrote:[/b]

AIDS is NOT the symptom. AIDS is what has happened to the immune system - it's a SYNDROME
that is used to define the "collection of one or more symptoms" that manifest once the syndrome
has taken hold...ie
the sarcomas,secondary viruses, broken bones, blindness etc etc

[/QUOTE]

AIDS HAS ALWAYS EXISTED
It is a condition
of the immune system
the junk science that is not scientificly backed up by real scientific evendence,
claims the depletion of the immune systemACRONYM A.I.D.S is aquired by HIV INFECTION
This is scenitifically unproven to be the case to this day

infact all the data that is scientific and known
based upon the facts ,
shows that THIS IMMUNE DEFICIENCY
IS Aquired AFTER
the drug programme of so called AIDS drugs is given

Before then the person labelled HIV + does not display the horrfic full blown immune deficiency symptons and they live healthy lives but are tormented by a label of a virus that is not
responsible for a disease, hnce they live but are in torment of lies

those whotook the aids medicine at first almost certainly died and very quickly from variuos diseases caused by having their immune systems destroyed

most of diseases they died from are also designated side effects of the drugs
the side effects are now given after the drug companies were forced to admit aids drugs cause many many deadly side effects
one of which is cancer in various forms. this infromation was released and became known, hence the california banning on azt into their water supply because it is proven to cause CANCER

hiv is a fraudulent label also as the hiv test cannot be sceintifically backed up by it's so called experts, who refuse to lie under oath in a court of law, for the sake of this money making genocide.

Hello,

I think this topic proves that the stigma around HIV/AIDS still remains even after three decades of the first cases in the US. I wonder if people would do the same 'research' and would comment the same amount if Freddie died from Hepatitis or Cancer. Probably not.

By the way, those sharing pictures of Freddie trying to identify 'HIV symptoms' are laughable. HIV can not be diagnosed by symptoms, bumps on the face, or marks in an arm. HIV is diagnosed by specific tests.

Anyone can look healthier than all of us together and be infected with HIV. Likewise, anyone can look sicker than all of us and be HIV negative.

Please leave Freddie's memory in peace.

not wanting to dredge over the passed dozens of posts - i don't think anyone was trying to diagnose hiv as the appearance of lumps and bumps. rather, i think that they were saying that at whatever point he had sarcomas then he was definitely HIV+ at that time, and that it was indisputable at that point in time

welcome to the debate

"i don't think anyone was trying to diagnose hiv as the appearance of lumps and bumps"

I think you're wrong. See below an example:
[i]
Gregsynth wrote: I have to give Bob credit for displaying this picture on his site--this may help solve mysteries:

http://www.queenlive.ca/queen/live%20pics/86-08-09_Knebworth_14.jpg

[b]On Freddie's left cheek, there's a small collection of little red bumps[/b] (it's right in-between the light reflecting on his face). These are not Kaposi's Sarcoma, but what appear to be shingles/herpes blisters. [b]I read that it's common to get this type of rash during the HIV[/b] stage after the latent stage (when the symptoms start to appear--but not yet at the severe stage).
[/i]
I wonder what would Freddie say if he read these comments.

He would say to himself,My God I was so wrong,there are still millions of people in mourn and loving me just this much even after 21 years,how I thought nobody would care if I died someday!!!and you know,and to us he would just say my curious fans!and then smile and pass,he was such a kind man,he was not that type to get angry at his fans,after all ,he knew well what loving a person so much means,you care for everything,simply everything!

I think he'd be repulsed.

Thank you so very much for a very informative post. I wish I knew how to find your other posts on this forum. Take good care. What a loss this world experienced through Freddie Mercury's passing. I was the cool punker chick during this time. pop music wasn't even in my thoughts. But now, I realize I missed some great stuff. I still liked David Bowie, Bob Marley, Michael Jackson, and for fun Rick James. Motorhead, Prince, and that's about it. The rest punk.

That is a great article,well researched! I remember the Simon Bates radio 1 interview in early 1985,it was cancelled and put back a week or two because Freddie had been really ill.He looked great,but changed quite a bit by the Magic tour.I guess it must have been confirmed around early 87,as it all went a bit quiet on the Queen front until The Miracle was announced with no tour.

Very good work indeed.

and regardless of what is established, proven about blisters, sarcomas, HIV and AIDs...there's only one indisputable fact that we ALL know about the whole saga

Freddie remains dead

Remains are always dead. Duh.