[QUOTE]
[b]brians wig wrote: [/b] [b]TyphoonTip wrote: [/b]
[b]On other audiophile forums you'll similarly find geek audiophiles also in complete disagreement as to the merits of these remasters when compared to the 1st presses.
[/b]------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ [/QUOTE]
I'd be interested in links to these forums please, so I can join and read the comments myself.
Thanks.
_________
There are plenty to choose from, but this one I frequent the most. But be warned, there are some pretty intense individuals on this site! ...However once you sift through the wankery, you can learn a lot. Geeks are a great resource in small doses. I've been introduced to some great music thanks to some brilliant posters.
[url=http://www.stevehoffman.tv/forums/]http://www.stevehoffman.tv/forums/[/url]
The 1994 EMI remasters are still definitive. A lot of work was put into these and brian and roger were heavily involved as well. They sound much more dynamic than the new remasters. The new ones may sound a bit brighter but they have lost a whole lot of involvement.
[QUOTE]
[b]Toozeup wrote: [/b] The 1994 EMI remasters are still definitive. A lot of work was put into these and brian and roger were heavily involved as well. They sound much more dynamic than the new remasters. The new ones may sound a bit brighter but they have lost a whole lot of involvement.[/QUOTE]
Well that's interesting because I've so far never heard a good word about them!
[b]TyphoonTip wrote:
There are plenty to choose from, but this one I frequent the most. But be warned, there are some pretty intense individuals on this site! ...However once you sift through the wankery, you can learn a lot. Geeks are a great resource in small doses. I've been introduced to some great music thanks to some brilliant posters.
http://www.stevehoffman.tv/forums/
[/b] [/QUOTE]
Ah!
Steve Hoffman.
The man I WISH had done the Queen remasters last year....
