Micrówave
Go hug a tree, Grateful Fan.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
catqueen
[QUOTE] [b]catqueen wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]Micrówave wrote:[/b]
I was refering to Bob, catqueen.[QUOTE]And for the record, my step-brother was stabbed in the heart 15 years ago and nearly died.[/QUOTE] Hey, maybe Bob can make fun of your step-brother. Give me a break about the Step-Brother. That's BS and you know it. If you were so into defending your brother's attacker's rights, where were you??? What have you done to reach out to the poor jailed victim who's rights are being violated in prison?[/QUOTE]
You're actually the one who is insulting him. Like i said, it was 15 years ago, do you REALLY think he is still in jail? My bro wasn't actually killed, it was attempted. And you can feck off from insulting him thanks. I'm pretty much willing to bet Bob would not be insulting him, Bob has a decent level of human care and emotion. And its not BS, do you want me to post bloody pictures of his wound? And i wasn't there, because i was 10 years old. Legally, i would have had no say. And logically, a 10 year old has very little original thought or mature insight into complex situations.[/QUOTE]
AND i live in a different country from him now.
[QUOTE] [b]Micrówave wrote:[/b]
I was refering to Bob, catqueen.[QUOTE]And for the record, my step-brother was stabbed in the heart 15 years ago and nearly died.[/QUOTE] Hey, maybe Bob can make fun of your step-brother. Give me a break about the Step-Brother. That's BS and you know it. If you were so into defending your brother's attacker's rights, where were you??? What have you done to reach out to the poor jailed victim who's rights are being violated in prison?[/QUOTE]
You're actually the one who is insulting him. Like i said, it was 15 years ago, do you REALLY think he is still in jail? My bro wasn't actually killed, it was attempted. And you can feck off from insulting him thanks. I'm pretty much willing to bet Bob would not be insulting him, Bob has a decent level of human care and emotion. And its not BS, do you want me to post bloody pictures of his wound? And i wasn't there, because i was 10 years old. Legally, i would have had no say. And logically, a 10 year old has very little original thought or mature insight into complex situations.[/QUOTE]
AND i live in a different country from him now.
The Real Wizard
[QUOTE] [b]GratefulFan wrote:[/b]
Happy 9th birthday Microwave![/QUOTE]
This is just a staggering new low, even for him.
A mentality of age nine is about correct. He wants the attention, and we sure are giving it to him.
Things like facts, critical thought and rational discourse are beyond his basic skill set. Leave him at the playground and let him play in peace.
Happy 9th birthday Microwave![/QUOTE]
This is just a staggering new low, even for him.
A mentality of age nine is about correct. He wants the attention, and we sure are giving it to him.
Things like facts, critical thought and rational discourse are beyond his basic skill set. Leave him at the playground and let him play in peace.
Micrówave
Sorry, catqueen.
Allow me to explain, if you're even interested. One of those knuckleheads started a thread about peeing on Marines, I'm sure you remember. When I defended the Marines by simply stating (1) not all marines are like that and (2) peeing on corpses is not the end of the world, they responded with a series of insults including towards a family member of mine.
In fact, they have a history of ganging up on people in here... seen it a few times.
So their stance really means nothing. I clearly stated my argument. If you don't like it, sorry to hear that. I don't want everyone thinking like me.
That's Bob.
Allow me to explain, if you're even interested. One of those knuckleheads started a thread about peeing on Marines, I'm sure you remember. When I defended the Marines by simply stating (1) not all marines are like that and (2) peeing on corpses is not the end of the world, they responded with a series of insults including towards a family member of mine.
In fact, they have a history of ganging up on people in here... seen it a few times.
So their stance really means nothing. I clearly stated my argument. If you don't like it, sorry to hear that. I don't want everyone thinking like me.
That's Bob.
Micrówave
@ The Real Hippo
I thought you weren't acknowledging me, Bob. Piss off. You should change your Queenzone name and use Hippo.
I thought you weren't acknowledging me, Bob. Piss off. You should change your Queenzone name and use Hippo.
The Real Wizard
If you change your name to "Town Bigot" ... you're on !
GratefulFan
[QUOTE]
[b]catqueen wrote: [/b] I'm not bloody canadian![/QUOTE]
There is no such thing as bloody Canadians. We're total pacifists. We don't even have band-aids here. Sometimes we get tiny scratches from hugging trees, but we feel obligated to hug the trees before we give them the death penalty. This is sadly necessary to build the national fence upon which we all sit.
[b]catqueen wrote: [/b] I'm not bloody canadian![/QUOTE]
There is no such thing as bloody Canadians. We're total pacifists. We don't even have band-aids here. Sometimes we get tiny scratches from hugging trees, but we feel obligated to hug the trees before we give them the death penalty. This is sadly necessary to build the national fence upon which we all sit.
Micrówave
Canadians aren't a race, Bob. They can't play hockey very well either.
catqueen
[QUOTE] [b]GratefulFan wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]catqueen wrote: [/b] I'm not bloody canadian![/QUOTE] There is no such thing as bloody Canadians. We're total pacifists. We don't even have band-aids here. Sometimes we get tiny scratches from hugging trees, but we feel obligated to hug the trees before we give them the death penalty. This is sadly necessary to build the national fence upon which we all sit.[/QUOTE]
hahahahahhahahahahahahha thanks so much GratefulFan, you really made my evening! :)
[QUOTE] [b]catqueen wrote: [/b] I'm not bloody canadian![/QUOTE] There is no such thing as bloody Canadians. We're total pacifists. We don't even have band-aids here. Sometimes we get tiny scratches from hugging trees, but we feel obligated to hug the trees before we give them the death penalty. This is sadly necessary to build the national fence upon which we all sit.[/QUOTE]
hahahahahhahahahahahahha thanks so much GratefulFan, you really made my evening! :)
catqueen
[QUOTE] [b]Micrówave wrote:[/b]
Sorry, catqueen.
Allow me to explain, if you're even interested. One of those knuckleheads started a thread about peeing on Marines, I'm sure you remember. When I defended the Marines by simply stating (1) not all marines are like that and (2) peeing on corpses is not the end of the world, they responded with a series of insults including towards a family member of mine.
In fact, they have a history of ganging up on people in here... seen it a few times.
So their stance really means nothing. I clearly stated my argument. If you don't like it, sorry to hear that. I don't want everyone thinking like me.
That's Bob.[/QUOTE]
Yes, i am interested as to why you think its bullshit that my bro was stabbed. And that isn't what you had said in that thread, you pretty much defended them for peeing on corpses and really sounded like you think people who thought this was wrong and shouldnt happen were anti-american and ignorant, cos your dad fought in vietnam and the anti-peeing on corpse ppl hadnt fought there (i guess u didnt either, but ur dad did?) I don't 'like' or agree with your ideas about capital punishment, BUT that is not why i have a problem with this thread. My problem is with the lack of respect you have for other people and their opinions. I think we need both sides of an argument, even if its just for the sake of having a 'devil's advocate' to suggest new ways of thinking, BUT we always need respect. And i understand that you didn't mean to insult my bro, but the fact that somebody else offended you online does not give you the right to slap me in the face and tell me that my bro's pain was bull.
Sorry, catqueen.
Allow me to explain, if you're even interested. One of those knuckleheads started a thread about peeing on Marines, I'm sure you remember. When I defended the Marines by simply stating (1) not all marines are like that and (2) peeing on corpses is not the end of the world, they responded with a series of insults including towards a family member of mine.
In fact, they have a history of ganging up on people in here... seen it a few times.
So their stance really means nothing. I clearly stated my argument. If you don't like it, sorry to hear that. I don't want everyone thinking like me.
That's Bob.[/QUOTE]
Yes, i am interested as to why you think its bullshit that my bro was stabbed. And that isn't what you had said in that thread, you pretty much defended them for peeing on corpses and really sounded like you think people who thought this was wrong and shouldnt happen were anti-american and ignorant, cos your dad fought in vietnam and the anti-peeing on corpse ppl hadnt fought there (i guess u didnt either, but ur dad did?) I don't 'like' or agree with your ideas about capital punishment, BUT that is not why i have a problem with this thread. My problem is with the lack of respect you have for other people and their opinions. I think we need both sides of an argument, even if its just for the sake of having a 'devil's advocate' to suggest new ways of thinking, BUT we always need respect. And i understand that you didn't mean to insult my bro, but the fact that somebody else offended you online does not give you the right to slap me in the face and tell me that my bro's pain was bull.
Micrówave
No, disrespect intended. I meant your brothers stabbing (in this context) is BS. You yourself stated he didn't die and his assailant is not a Death Row inmate... so that point had no bearing here.
But as for your problem with me and being insulting, here was the first "insult" in this thread. I didn't see you chastise Bob, but you go on having a problem with me for firing back.
[QUOTE]
[b]The Real Wizard wrote: [/b] "You're not allowed to change your opinion on anything in light of new evidence"
Binary thinking at its best.
There aren't too many people who'd want to see the world's most prominent human rights organization shut down. Most of them are dictators.
In an elite club you are. You should be proud.[/QUOTE]
But as for your problem with me and being insulting, here was the first "insult" in this thread. I didn't see you chastise Bob, but you go on having a problem with me for firing back.
[QUOTE]
[b]The Real Wizard wrote: [/b] "You're not allowed to change your opinion on anything in light of new evidence"
Binary thinking at its best.
There aren't too many people who'd want to see the world's most prominent human rights organization shut down. Most of them are dictators.
In an elite club you are. You should be proud.[/QUOTE]
catqueen
[QUOTE] [b]Micrówave wrote:[/b]
No, disrespect intended. I meant your brothers stabbing (in this context) is BS. You yourself stated he didn't die and his assailant is not a Death Row inmate... so that point had no bearing here.But as for your problem with me and being insulting, here was the first "insult" in this thread. I didn't see you chastise Bob, but you go on having a problem with me for firing back.[QUOTE] [b]The Real Wizard wrote: [/b] "You're not allowed to change your opinion on anything in light of new evidence"Binary thinking at its best.There aren't too many people who'd want to see the world's most prominent human rights organization shut down. Most of them are dictators.In an elite club you are. You should be proud.[/QUOTE][/QUOTE]
Bob wasn't insulting me and i figured you're a big boy who can stand up for himself lol. And no, he didn't die, but he almost did, was in intensive care for a long time, and very nearly did die. And it has significantly affected his life. I wasn't intending to say that i know how a murder victim's family feels, i clearly don't, but the guy who stabbed him did WANT to kill him, it was just chance that help arrived quickly enough to save him. If help hadn't arrived, he would be dead. And it was an attempted murder, so i do know the intensity of waking up and hearing that someone you love might die because someone else tried to kill them. So because of that, it does have personal relevance to me. And even if he had died, yes i'd be angry, yes i'd want to rip the man's guts out (i did, even though he DIDN'T die), but that doesn't mean that that is the right thing to do. My motives would be purely based on revenge, not on the best thing for society, and that is a completely wrong motive for supporting killing. What i was trying to say by bringing it up, is that I have got some level of personal experience in the area, or at least it is somewhat close to home for me. And i also know someone who was murdered, even though i wasn't particularly close to her or anything. And the person who killed her was never convicted, even though pretty much the whole town knows who it was. And horrible as it is, and much as my instinct wants him to suffer, all humans have basic rights including the right to physical safety.
And its definately more relevant then bickering over who invented the telephone. It is relevant because YOUR argument at one point was regarding people not caring about victims. I was just pointing out that my anti-capital punishment stance is despite the fact that it has directly affected me, even though he didn't actually die.
No, disrespect intended. I meant your brothers stabbing (in this context) is BS. You yourself stated he didn't die and his assailant is not a Death Row inmate... so that point had no bearing here.But as for your problem with me and being insulting, here was the first "insult" in this thread. I didn't see you chastise Bob, but you go on having a problem with me for firing back.[QUOTE] [b]The Real Wizard wrote: [/b] "You're not allowed to change your opinion on anything in light of new evidence"Binary thinking at its best.There aren't too many people who'd want to see the world's most prominent human rights organization shut down. Most of them are dictators.In an elite club you are. You should be proud.[/QUOTE][/QUOTE]
Bob wasn't insulting me and i figured you're a big boy who can stand up for himself lol. And no, he didn't die, but he almost did, was in intensive care for a long time, and very nearly did die. And it has significantly affected his life. I wasn't intending to say that i know how a murder victim's family feels, i clearly don't, but the guy who stabbed him did WANT to kill him, it was just chance that help arrived quickly enough to save him. If help hadn't arrived, he would be dead. And it was an attempted murder, so i do know the intensity of waking up and hearing that someone you love might die because someone else tried to kill them. So because of that, it does have personal relevance to me. And even if he had died, yes i'd be angry, yes i'd want to rip the man's guts out (i did, even though he DIDN'T die), but that doesn't mean that that is the right thing to do. My motives would be purely based on revenge, not on the best thing for society, and that is a completely wrong motive for supporting killing. What i was trying to say by bringing it up, is that I have got some level of personal experience in the area, or at least it is somewhat close to home for me. And i also know someone who was murdered, even though i wasn't particularly close to her or anything. And the person who killed her was never convicted, even though pretty much the whole town knows who it was. And horrible as it is, and much as my instinct wants him to suffer, all humans have basic rights including the right to physical safety.
And its definately more relevant then bickering over who invented the telephone. It is relevant because YOUR argument at one point was regarding people not caring about victims. I was just pointing out that my anti-capital punishment stance is despite the fact that it has directly affected me, even though he didn't actually die.
catqueen
And quick question - if the person killed was, say, a child abuser, and the child grew up and later killed the person who abused them, do you think the child should be executed? It was still murder, still unjustifiable.
If the murderer killed someone who had been domestically violating them for years and years and years and years, until one day they snapped and poisoned them, should they be executed?
If the murderer had a mental health issue, should he be executed?
If someone was killed in a drug war, should the murderer be executed? Even though it was hit and miss which one would have been killed if it was a gang situation?
If the murderer killed someone who had been domestically violating them for years and years and years and years, until one day they snapped and poisoned them, should they be executed?
If the murderer had a mental health issue, should he be executed?
If someone was killed in a drug war, should the murderer be executed? Even though it was hit and miss which one would have been killed if it was a gang situation?
The Real Wizard
[QUOTE] [b]Micrówave wrote:[/b]
Canadians aren't a race, Bob. They can't play hockey very well either.[/QUOTE]
It's true. We bribed Obama so that we'd win the Olympic gold in 2010.
Stupid Obama. Just think, if women weren't allowed to vote like Ann Coulter suggests, we'd have McCain and Palin running the show. They would have told those tree-hugging Canadians to hit the road.
Canadians aren't a race, Bob. They can't play hockey very well either.[/QUOTE]
It's true. We bribed Obama so that we'd win the Olympic gold in 2010.
Stupid Obama. Just think, if women weren't allowed to vote like Ann Coulter suggests, we'd have McCain and Palin running the show. They would have told those tree-hugging Canadians to hit the road.
GratefulFan
[QUOTE]
[b]catqueen wrote: [/b] [QUOTE] [b]GratefulFan wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]catqueen wrote: [/b] I'm not bloody canadian![/QUOTE] There is no such thing as bloody Canadians. We're total pacifists. We don't even have band-aids here. Sometimes we get tiny scratches from hugging trees, but we feel obligated to hug the trees before we give them the death penalty. This is sadly necessary to build the national fence upon which we all sit.[/QUOTE]
hahahahahhahahahahahahha thanks so much GratefulFan, you really made my evening! :)[/QUOTE]
Could we say I 'enhanced' your evening? 'Made' is a bit too much like 'Invented'. As a Canadian I'm not comfortable with claiming I invented your evening.
[b]catqueen wrote: [/b] [QUOTE] [b]GratefulFan wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]catqueen wrote: [/b] I'm not bloody canadian![/QUOTE] There is no such thing as bloody Canadians. We're total pacifists. We don't even have band-aids here. Sometimes we get tiny scratches from hugging trees, but we feel obligated to hug the trees before we give them the death penalty. This is sadly necessary to build the national fence upon which we all sit.[/QUOTE]
hahahahahhahahahahahahha thanks so much GratefulFan, you really made my evening! :)[/QUOTE]
Could we say I 'enhanced' your evening? 'Made' is a bit too much like 'Invented'. As a Canadian I'm not comfortable with claiming I invented your evening.