Queenconcerts.com

"Bad trader alert - David R. Fuller! Breaks promises, lies, steals expensive recordings from people who trust him. BEWARE!!! I haven't come across such a betrayal since late 90's."

And you have a gall to say something like that?? Sorry but after everything what you've done you should be as quiet as a mouse.

*sigh*

WTF ?

[QUOTE] [b]pittrek wrote:[/b]
WTF ?[/QUOTE]
Indeed!

Only they know...

Mr Scully runs QueenConcerts.com. I'm assuming he posted that text regarding David Fuller on his Website. The OP is taking a jab at Mr Scully for posting that, who -without a doubt- will not care at all.

I like Hamburgers.

Especially when logging onto Queenconcerts.com.   Sometimes I go with Bacon but there will always be cheese.

[QUOTE]
And you have a gall to say something like that?? Sorry but after everything what you've done you should be as quiet as a mouse.[/QUOTE]
sorry for bumping old thread but can anyone describe shortly to others what do you mean by "after everything what you've done"? what that guy "has done"? maybe I've missed something.

i admire his queenconcerts.com very much (same as queenlive.ca - really great work and useful websites are these)

I'd suggest everybody ignore the speculative garbage about everybody else and just enjoy the websites and YouTube channels and releases for what they are, rather than contributing one more second to the irresponsible character trashing all around.

Well i think Martin his point is to harsh. Though i fully agree did dave the cross the thin red line it isn't fair to put his name on a website. Google will keep on finding his name this can have a very negative effect for dave his future job interviews or other applications. Though he did the wrong thing Martin isn't a judge nor should he act like one.
I personally think he wouldn't like a message on the internet saying that martin Scully is a child abuser. This is what happened to friend of mine. Though he could prove it wasn't true he lost his job as a police captain due to this sort of postings on the internet! In the end he was forced tomove to another region to have a quiet social and family life. Though it wasn't only he that moved to another place so did the false rumours. He hanged himself in the end to give his wife and daughters some rest...
I think public lynching isn't the right of one person. It's incorrect and unethical to put someone's name on your website in a bad way. And did Dave steal anything which belonged to
Martin ? If not scully sould be a greater man to remove his fuller his name from his website. Or give fuller the right defend scully his accusation openly on scully his website. Now dave hasn't any posibilty to defend hinself or explain the acusatation made tomhim by skala.

[QUOTE] [b]ghostwithasmile wrote:[/b]
Well i think Martin his point is to harsh. Though i fully agree did dave the cross the thin red line it isn't fair to put his name on a website. Google will keep on finding his name this can have a very negative effect for dave his future job interviews or other applications. Though he did the wrong thing Martin isn't a judge nor should he act like one.
I personally think he wouldn't like a message on the internet saying that martin Skala is a child abuser. This is what happened to friend of mine. Though he could prove it wasn't true he lost his job as a police captain due to this sort of postings on the internet! In the end he was forced tomove to another region to have a quiet social and family life. Though it wasn't only he that moved to another place so did the false rumours. He hanged himself in the end to give his wife and daughters some rest...
I think public lynching isn't the right of one person. It's incorrect and unethical to put someone's name on your website in a bad way. And did Dave steal anything which belonged to
Martin ? If not scully sould be a greater man to remove his fuller his name from his website. Or give fuller the right defend scully his accusation openly on scully his website. Now dave hasn't any posibilty to defend hinself or explain the acusatation made tomhim by skala. [/QUOTE]
That's not the problem. Martin Skala made friends with Peter Freestone who at that time lived in Prague(still lives?). He was given a tape with Hot Space demos in case that he would not deal for it with other collectors, but he stared to and it was certain that everything will leak soon. And then it happened. Peter was pissed off and said he'll not share his tapes with anyone excepting QP.

I don't think having DRF's name on a website may mar his chances at a job interview ... his actions may. It's good for his potential employers to know who he is. If DRF were innocent, he could sue for libel. He hasn't (AFAIK), so...

[QUOTE]

[b]pietrek1994 wrote: [/b] [QUOTE] [b]ghostwithasmile wrote:[/b]
Well i think Martin his point is to harsh. Though i fully agree did dave the cross the thin red line it isn't fair to put his name on a website. Google will keep on finding his name this can have a very negative effect for dave his future job interviews or other applications. Though he did the wrong thing Martin isn't a judge nor should he act like one.
I personally think he wouldn't like a message on the internet saying that martin Skala is a child abuser. This is what happened to friend of mine. Though he could prove it wasn't true he lost his job as a police captain due to this sort of postings on the internet! In the end he was forced tomove to another region to have a quiet social and family life. Though it wasn't only he that moved to another place so did the false rumours. He hanged himself in the end to give his wife and daughters some rest...
I think public lynching isn't the right of one person. It's incorrect and unethical to put someone's name on your website in a bad way. And did Dave steal anything which belonged to
Martin ? If not scully sould be a greater man to remove his fuller his name from his website. Or give fuller the right defend scully his accusation openly on scully his website. Now dave hasn't any posibilty to defend hinself or explain the acusatation made tomhim by skala. [/QUOTE]
That's not the problem. Martin Skala made friends with Peter Freestone who at that time lived in Prague(still lives?). He was given a tape with Hot Space demos in case that he would not deal for it with other collectors, but he stared to and it was certain that everything will leak soon. And then it happened. Peter was pissed off and said he'll not share his tapes with anyone excepting QP.[/QUOTE]
While I never heard of Martin being attached to the HS demo tape leaks, my understanding from a serious conversation I'd had last year was that there a "few people" (quote and unquote) who made copies of the tape and betrayed Peter's trust in the process, when they were strictly meant to be played FOR certain people (as in to be listened to, not copied). Same way the FM/MJ demos leaked!

[QUOTE] [b]pietrek1994 wrote:[/b]
That's not the problem. Martin Skala made friends with Peter Freestone who at that time lived in Prague(still lives?). He was given a tape with Hot Space demos in case that he would not deal for it with other collectors, but he stared to and it was certain that everything will leak soon. And then it happened. Peter was pissed off and said he'll not share his tapes with anyone excepting QP.[/QUOTE]
Assuming your user name is the year you were born - these things happened when you were barely out of diapers.

Either way, you should keep your mouth shut about things you know nothing about.

Let's face it, Martin Scully was never fond of anyone releasing anything outside the trading network. I remember him getting very upset over a number of leaks in the 2005-07 period, so I'm not surprised.

I don't like hoarders myself, but I don't think Martin OR DRF are important enough to get upset about. Both think they are tremendously important, and evidently Sebastian thinks so too, throwing around big words like 'libel'.
Tell me, Sebastian, do you honestly think anyone is going to waste money on a libel suit against Martin Scully, which at the *very least* would involve the jurisdiction of two countries (probably three, if DRF is not British)?

Bottom line: a few childish collectors are having a go at each other. Have the teacher break it up and send a stern note to their parents, because honestly, it's not worth any more attention than that.