greaserkat wrote:brENsKi wrote:greaserkat wrote:brENsKi wrote:
@GreatfulFan
I know exactly what you mean. still feel the same about Vinatieri's FG against the Rams. Years of mediocrity and sh*t erased with one kick as time expired. fantastic
Thanks to the ref's fucked up call in the Raiders-Pats game
no. the ref explained it wrong at the time, but got the reversal decision spot on :-)
you're not a bitter silver n black are you?
Hell no, Red and Gold all the way!! And Brady's arm was not moving forward when the ball came out
that's NOT how the tuck rule works. it's impossible to know the intent of the quarterback, therefore once the arm has gone forward (which it had) the Oakland commentary says it went forward - but they say he pumps...
listen @ 2:41 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pDQAmuZ8t94
at 3:06 he corrects himself to say he was looking to throw
again...guesswork
as i said...you can never know the intent of the quaterback
therefore tuck rule favours the passer
most significant thing about the whole thing....while the ref is looking at the replay monitor 3:29 - you can clearly hear Phil Collins' In the Air Tonight...was this some kind of prophecy?