[QUOTE] [b]plumrach wrote:[/b]
Another Roger (re) wrote
I heard someone say in the news that Mick Jagger is the best singer and frontman in history of rock. I have to state the obvious: What a load of bullshit!
______________________________________
Agreed[/QUOTE]
..
'
Mick Jagger does'nt sing, he shouts.
Wow..... contributors on a Queen fan site think Freddie is better than Mick.
Who'd have thought?
[QUOTE] [b]mooghead wrote:[/b]
Wow..... contributors on a Queen fan site think Freddie is better than Mick.
Who'd have thought?[/QUOTE]
Go out there and ask anyone, anytime. Mick sure has got charisma and charm. But musicality and vocals are not his main stregths. He shines in more sexy-free-controvertial concepts. Like this unbeliveble performance http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mrBYfAtEAps
How can ANYONE say Jagger is a better singer than Freddie?? I mean thats not just opinion. From a technical mathematical proveable point of view Freddie is technically the better singer. There is just no debate.
[QUOTE] [b]BelfastQueenFan wrote:[/b]
How can ANYONE say Jagger is a better singer than Freddie?? I mean thats not just opinion. From a technical mathematical proveable point of view Freddie is technically the better singer. There is just no debate.[/QUOTE]
Jagger is not a singer. He is a performer who sings, an actor and a really charismatisc provocateur of some kind.
