popy wrote:earwig wrote:
P.S. What I mean is that there wouldn't be any point in having the promo videos or concerts that were shot on video - e.g. Bo Rap and Wembley 86 - on Blu-ray as you wouldn't gain any extra quality...
Made a long post. Queenzone deleted it when i pressed "post message".
To sum things up: yes it would gain quality, because Blu-Ray it's not an HD format, it's a MASS STORAGE DEVICE.
If done properly, even videos like Greatest Video Hits (or any other shot on tape) would gain quality comparing it to the DVD. Why? Because Blu-ray has more space to store things. Video bit-rate would be as high as a Blu-Ray can take, and quality would be as close as possible to the original video-tapes.
Also, audio quality would be in lossless format.
Don't forget that Blu-Ray is a mass storage device, like cassete-tapes, CD's, laser-liscs, video-CD's, hard-drives, DVD's, USB flash drive, etc...
Very interesting debate! :-)
I totally get the mass storage thing: I could burn my old VHS camcorder recordings to DVD (or indeed Blu-Ray) but I still wouldn't gain any quality - even if I authored at the highest bit rate.
If Earls Court 77 was shot (and I assume it was) on PAL 2" QUAD, then even on the maximum bit rate filling a 50GB Blu-ray it will still only look like PAL 2" QUAD!!! (we could get into upscaling but lets leave that for now!)
I agree with the audio though; I have the 2 DVD-Audios of ANATO & The Game and they sound great on 24 bit 96kHz :-)
BUT... if several concerts were put together on one single 50GN Blu-ray then yes: that would be great!!