nostradamus was a mythical figure
he never wote that twaddle in reality
he was persicuted physician who was defying the catholic church by his medical knoweldge dring the plague
the vatican killed him and then defamed or infamed him by putting his name to those so called prphecies
most of which are bullshit but some were based upon vatican plans of assination and the like
so no prophecy involved just pre planned murders etc[/QUOTE]
Wow. You are pretty obsessed with far-out conspiracy theories, aren't you?
thomasquinn 32989 · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]Heavenite wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]thomasquinn 32989 wrote:[/b]
First, you will need to learn how to read medieval French. Then, you will need to learn to decipher Michel de Nôtredam's handwriting, which, as I gather, is no small challenge. Then, you will have to dig through line after line of deliberately vague pseudo-poetry. Good luck.[/QUOTE]
Hmmm.....thanks Thomas! But it sounds like a bit too much hard work for something I don't necessarily believe in.[/QUOTE]
I can imagine. It's not something I'd like to spend my time on either. Having said that, deciphering mid-19th century handwriting is just as bad, but somehow, I still do that...
jones904 · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]thomasquinn 32989 wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]jones904 wrote:[/b]
nostradamus was a mythical figure
he never wote that twaddle in reality
he was persicuted physician who was defying the catholic church by his medical knoweldge dring the plague
the vatican killed him and then defamed or infamed him by putting his name to those so called prphecies
most of which are bullshit but some were based upon vatican plans of assination and the like
so no prophecy involved just pre planned murders etc[/QUOTE]
Wow. You are pretty obsessed with far-out conspiracy theories, aren't you?
[/QUOTE]
tut tut
The very idea of Nostradamus prophesying future world events is in itself the grandest of conspiracy theories
me m
giving you a sensible remedy for such a wild speculation is not conspiratorial in the least, it is only applying a logical reasoning based upon known historical situations and facts, even if the cause of it all was a catholic conspiracy of murder, which shouldn't be that hard to believe seeing as murder is something they have done far more than any other world power in human history .
The english and catholics spread small pox in the americas
with donations of blankets to the unwanted natives you know, and it is was not something new to them
That peski doctor micheal, was halting their plan of genicide, they had to see to him and quickly, as for the besmirching, that is something they specialize in, after all they like the scribes and pharisses before them make blasphemous shrines out of the tombs of the saints they murdered.
thomasquinn 32989 · Member since
You know nothing about history. If you did, you'd be aware of the fact that Europe was littered with books of prophecy in the time of Nostradamus, the 16th century (an age obsessed with the supernatural more than any era in documented history) - that is one of the reasons why the Catholic church didn't bother doing anything about Nostradamus: he wasn't doing anything out of the ordinary. It's a matter of pure coincidence that Nostradamus' works are still known today, mostly because his contemporaries believed he got one prophecy right (the one where he seemed to prophecy the death of Henry II of France; the fact that the king's wealthy widow believed this certainly did much for him). He was only once brought to trial, in 1561, simply because he hadn't asked permission from a bishop to publish his latest almanac, which meant, in practice, that he had simply not paid a standard fee for it.
Your bizarre theory that Nostradamus was trying to halt the SPANISH genocide of native Americans when he was in fact FRENCH and, like his contemporaries, knew practically nothing of America is entirely baseless and deranged.
