Good decent boxsets. Your opinion

[QUOTE]

[b]The Real Wizard wrote: [/b] The entire January 1969 Let It Be sessions exist to the public, but no Beatles fans were short-sighted enough to assume that the collectors who found and spread the tapes must have been the in-house engineer and janitor. They know better than to make conclusions about things they don't know about.

It's not "sucking up" that collectors seek. Some acknowledgement of the basic process would be nice instead of giving the credit to someone who did nothing to actually obtain the material.

Learn to say thanks for things you had no part in acquiring. All you had to do was point and click. Why is this so hard to understand?[/QUOTE]

Many people do says thanks, so that argument is the usual smokescreen for ego trips and hubris. You, personally never tire of asking for compliments, gratitude etc, while claiming the complete opposite. (And on that point, why should anyone show endless gratitude to you for sharing something that's worthless to you? You have stated, over and over, that these things leak out only when the trading community has completely used them to their maximum benefit and when their trading value is zero. If your ego demands that we see you as selfless, share something that's really valuable to you.) But at the end of the day, share or don't share, it makes little odds to me, just stop pretending you are only doing this for everyone's benefit because the first and last people collectors look after is themselves.

Is there no low to which you will not sink, Holly? Are you going to hijack this topic too, just to spew your bile at Bob?

Except that it was the "Real Wizard" who pulled the topic in this direction, not Holly. 'Hijacking' to you has been pretty consistently any consequence you don't like.

[QUOTE]

[b]thomasquinn 32989 wrote: [/b] Is there no low to which you will not sink, Holly? Are you going to hijack this topic too, just to spew your bile at Bob?[/QUOTE]

Hijack? I'm responding to BOB's COMMENTS which are nothing to do with the actual topic (boxsets). lol

Bob's not above spewing bile. I guess your mutual lovefest precludes you from seeing that. After all you are, according to Bob, "the best historian this forurm or any forum could ever have" (swoon) lol

You are completely fucking deluded if you see anything in that post to merit your ad-hominem. I'm not surprised, though. The pair of you are the definite postergirls for selectively blind self-righteousness.

[QUOTE]

[b]thomasquinn 32989 wrote: [/b] You are completely fucking deluded if you see anything in that post to merit your ad-hominem. I'm not surprised, though. The pair of you are the definite postergirls for selectively blind self-righteousness.[/QUOTE]

Settle down Thomas. You made an ass of yourself again. Admit it.

ps I'm still waiting for an apology on that WTC thread where you called me a racist. You made an ass of yourself there too and then ran away with your tail between your legs. Are you going to grow a set of balls and admit you were wrong or continue as you are like an immature troll?

You need to learn to read. I didn't say you are a racist - I said you submit to racist sentiments. I'm not surprised either that this distinction is beyond your comprehension.

[QUOTE]

[b]thomasquinn 32989 wrote: [/b] You need to learn to read. I didn't say you are a racist - I said you submit to racist sentiments. I'm not surprised either that this distinction is beyond your comprehension.[/QUOTE]

An intellectually fraudulent answer from you. No surprise there. Here's what you said.

"You really don't understand any of this, do you?  As you might've noticed, if you ever noticed anything other than your own [b]narrow-minded prejudice[/b], I followed this thread when it was still new, back in 2010, so I know pretty well what it is about.  But apparently [b]you are such a bigot[/b] that you believe nobody has any right to even criticize the leaders of the Catholic church, but it's ok to violate the religious freedom of Muslims wholesale. [b]I support equal treatment for everyone, regardless of race, gender, religious views, etc. You clearly don't." 
  [/b] 
  Still awaiting an apology ...

Oh, and your lovely, nice 'wouldn't hurt a fly' mate Bob agreed with this bile. Before running off like you to hide.

I would have highlighted the bit about the Catholic Church too. That was twisted and unfair in its own way given the complete absence of any such view one way or the other in your posts. Something that didn't exist was used to leverage other points that had no basis and I thought it genuinely rotten all around.

Double post.