Obviously you're an expert on what is in someone else's collection.[/QUOTE]
Isn't that what we're to accept from you et al? That you're experts on what was in Fuller's collection outside of Fanthology? We're you particularly close? Serious question: was there any truly uncirculated or previously unknown tracks in Fanthology that ended up for sale for sale on Dave's list? Wouldn't that be a better way to lay out a case that everybody could trust enough to make ethical decisions on what to avoid from him? At the time of the blowup I recall there may have been one of the initial leaks that was alleged to be uncirculated, but that everything else in Fanthology had been circulated in some way to greater or lesser degrees. Is that the case?[/QUOTE]
Can we please keep the Sharing of Music section clear of quarrelling from you who do not know anything about music downloads except queen music at youtube ?
All those questions that you were asking - why don't you go and ask DF himself because you only believe his side of the story ?
pidge123 · Member since
Please please please can all you ego's out there trying to score points off each other give it a rest and just get back to the music, genuine fans are asking simple questions about shares and not getting answers, are we just too small to be included in this forum.Its quite sad really.(bet i get slagged off)
The Real Wizard · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]pidge123 wrote:[/b]
Please please please can all you ego's out there trying to score points off each other give it a rest and just get back to the music, genuine fans are asking simple questions about shares and not getting answers, are we just too small to be included in this forum.Its quite sad really.(bet i get slagged off)[/QUOTE]
You'd better not get slagged off, as it's a very fair question. But amongst all the ignorance that's popped onto this forum as of late, the genuine questions are getting lost in the mix.
There is no exact date or venue of this recording. All we know is it's from the second half of 1967.
pidge123 · Member since
thanks for the reply. it is a shame that when great new stuff does come out it seems more important to slag someone off than understand exactly what we are getting. as long as a few sensible heads remain we will get the answers in the end. thanks.
The Real Wizard · Member since
Perhaps if more people were vocal against the rampant ignorance on this website there would be an increase in the overall quality of discourse here.
Without moderation it's the only option.
brians wig · Member since
[QUOTE]
[QUOTE] [b]Freddie`s my Hero wrote:[/b]
Stuart think that he`s god but he`s not god He lied that he has Hangman but this he hasn`t He`s loser! [/QUOTE] --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you know he hasn't got Hangman. Just because it's not in the Queen archives (or so we've been told!), doesn't mean that an acetate of it doesn't exist and doesn't reside in John Stuart's archive. There are lots of multitracks missing for known Queen songs (NOTW in particular), so it's hardly unfeasible to presume that QPL don't hold the multitracks for this.
Of course, if one acetate exists, there may be another and I wouldn't be surprised if Brian holds one in his personal archive along with the only known acetate of the De Lane Lea demo sessions (or are you going to disclaim that only one acetate of that exists....?)[/QUOTE]
The Real Wizard · Member since
Logic and facts obviously aren't feasible options in these threads.
