A Thread

tero! 48531 wrote:

Wow. I would never have guessed that there's was a poster as pathetic as this on Queenzone.

Imagine that somebody has spent an hour and a half posting rubbish just to get the same amount of posts as the real rrocknrolllover, just to make it more difficult to spot the difference between the real one and the fake.

I guess (s)he doesn't need the privilege of posting on a public message board, if he's happy to write 53 consecutive pages of garbage all on his own...

Two years ago, the same story took place on QZ.

Chief Mouse wrote:

Lostman wrote:

http://www.queenzone.com/forums/1352099/bannable-offense-by-inu.aspx

Woah! Someone really has time on their hands :-)

EXCEPT THAT IS *NOT* ME. And that can be easily proven if YourValentine or Richard Orchard will take some time to quickly cross check the IP logs and verify that in public!

I have had just about ENOUGH with this trolling, bullying and harassment directed towards me. I am going to make some VERY serious legal inquiries soon if these actions do not cease immediately. And I am NOT bluffing!!

I never even targeted that at you. Frankly I've got no idea who is this.
That I targeted at fake rocknrollllover who made thousand posts in this thread http://www.queenzone.com/forums/1352099/bannable-offense-by-inu.aspx

My apologies Chief. However my anger right now is more directed at that topic and the contents therein, and given that the real rnr troll sent me some harassing PM's just earlier, I wanted to make it very clear I had nothing to do with this.

That's ok, I can understand your anger very well. I don't think that's you. Just doesn't look like it to me.

Cheers Chief

Chief Mouse wrote:

I never even targeted that at you. Frankly I've got no idea who is this.
That I targeted at fake rocknrollllover who made thousand posts in this thread http://www.queenzone.com/forums/1352099/bannable-offense-by-inu.aspx

Hah..there are enough assholes on the planet like him.

inu-liger wrote:

My apologies Chief. However my anger right now is more directed at that topic and the contents therein, and given that the real rnr troll sent me some harassing PM's just earlier, I wanted to make it very clear I had nothing to do with this.

Are you angry at me? The 1000+ posts of "it's true" were not of my doing.

My original post contains 4 direct quotes from you - How can you be angry at that?

I'm certainly annoyed by the fact that you would deliberately try and cause a public stir by using quotes against me, never mind that you totally did not even use any context to explain the quotes or where they came from. Never mind that at worst, they would be far more likely to merit a *warning* from the admins - you are absolutely forgetting that I have been on this board since 2000, I have pulled stunts and said things that should have never been said that honestly on certain occasions (particularly in the first few years I was here) SHOULD have merited suspensions or a permaban.
And I have been if anything more helpful, though usually behind the scenes, in the last few years getting involved with various projects and contributions from which this site's users have definitely benefitted.
SOMETHING which definitely cannot be attributed to nor said of rockandrolllover, whose sole purpose is to annoy people and harass the QPL reps while pretending to be a Russian with poor English skills.

So PLEASE explain in logical terms how your flawed attempt at a topic there will realistically convince the admins to place a ban on me. Take into consideration that YV has also pubicly remarked on at least one occasion that she noticed that if anything I actually have *improved* over the years!

(Read = You have no realistic hope of getting me banned with that logic of yours)

inu-liger wrote:

I'm certainly annoyed by the fact that you would deliberately try and cause a public stir by using quotes against me, never mind that you totally did not even use any context to explain the quotes or where they came from. Never mind that at worst, they would be far more likely to merit a *warning* from the admins - you are absolutely forgetting that I have been on this board since 2000, I have pulled stunts and said things that should have never been said that honestly on certain occasions (particularly in the first few years I was here) SHOULD have merited suspensions or a permaban.
And I have been if anything more helpful, though usually behind the scenes, in the last few years getting involved with various projects and contributions from which this site's users have definitely benefitted.
SOMETHING which definitely cannot be attributed to nor said of rockandrolllover, whose sole purpose is to annoy people and harass the QPL reps while pretending to be a Russian with poor English skills.

So PLEASE explain in logical terms how your flawed attempt at a topic there will realistically convince the admins to place a ban on me. Take into consideration that YV has also pubicly remarked on at least one occasion that she noticed that if anything I actually have *improved* over the years!

(Read = You have no realistic hope of getting me banned with that logic of yours)

I was not hoping you get banned. I merely object at your lobbying to have rnr-3L-over banned while your behavior is less than stellar.

rnr-3L-over may not be a model QZ poster, but I do not believe that his "sole purpose is to annoy people and harass the QPL reps". Perhaps he is just an overzealous "Rainbow" promoter.

IMO, rnr-3L-over receives more crap on QZ than he dishes out.

Panchgani wrote:

I was not hoping you get banned. I merely object at your lobbying to have rnr-3L-over banned while your behavior is less than stellar.

Is that so? Tell me exactly why, if I'm such a not-so-stellar character, I have been able to maintain my membership on this board then for over 13 years? Again, especially after incidents FAR worse that could have capped my tenure here well under 3-5 years ;-)

rnr-3L-over may not be a model QZ poster, but I do not believe that his "sole purpose is to annoy people and harass the QPL reps". Perhaps he is just an overzealous "Rainbow" promoter.

The Rainbow shows have not been the sole focus of his overzealousness. He had harassed myself, GT and I think Gregsynth too (not too sure with him!) when we initially announced the eventual release of the EC '77 remastered audience recording, demanding that we released it immediately or soon enough anyways, and ignored our explanations that the remastering-restoration work alone was the reason that we were following a set timeline and that we were not going to put out a half-assed release.

I think there were occasions where GT (and Greg Brooks?) publicly asked rnr to stop harassing them and that they were going to ignore his e-mails, if my memory serves me correctly.

IMO, rnr-3L-over receives more crap on QZ than he dishes out.

I'm not sure at this point why you have a continuing tendency to stand up for the wrong folks, but anyways, rnr certainly deserves a lot of the flak he gets. He has refused to comply with requests from numerous users to stop the trolling and act like a civilized being, and insists he is not a troll.
How exactly can you NOT get seriously annoyed with a pathological character like that?? But then again.... Nah I'd rather not revisit that route....

I like chips.

rocknrollllover wrote:

Somebody should troll the fuck out of Anton, if only there was some obvious way to do that...........cough

Funny

Lostman wrote:

I think it doesn't need to be made any more clear to everyone that there are actually two rnrlover's posting on here, does it??

yeah. and just when you thought it couldn't get ANY worse...it somehow got TWICE as bad

brENsKi wrote:

Lostman wrote:

I think it doesn't need to be made any more clear to everyone that there are actually two rnrlover's posting on here, does it??

yeah. and just when you thought it couldn't get ANY worse...it somehow got TWICE as bad

Perhaps.