Anyone seen the e-fit pics? I was wondering why John Deacon's been keeping a low profile.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Have to admit, there is some resemblace
http://static.iltalehti.fi/ulkomaat/kuvatjuttujh141013_503_ul.jpg
http://static.iltalehti.fi/ulkomaat/kuvatjuttujh141013_503_ul.jpg
Thought exactly the same thing when I saw them on the front page this morning if I'm honest! Spooky..
Yep, me too, but he has a bald head now. Also, we all know who really did this dreadful thing, don't we?
Slicklslack clearly has no concept of anguish...
oh my god! saw the title of this post this morn and never read it. then went down the shop and saw the front pages. all the way home I was smiling coz I knew what someone had written. lol. ture its a dreadful thing though.you can see the pain on the parents faces. its heartbreaking.
horse feathers wrote:
Yep, me too, but he has a bald head now. Also, we all know who really did this dreadful thing, don't we?
no we don't. that's why there's a police investigation.
unless of course YOU know...in which case why don't you give Scotland Yard a call - i'm sure they'd more than welcome your input.
or alternatively (as your inference shows a complete disdain for libel laws) why don't you enlighten us with "who really did this dreadful thing" ?
scum like that don't even deserve to breath the same air as us! don't know how they can sleep at night. sad to think there are people like that around us.
Brenski, there is no police investigation, it was closed in 2008. Our police are getting involved because David Cameron asked them to get involved.
As for libel laws, they have tried to sue everyone else, without success, one more won't make a difference. Read up on the case, like I have for the past 6 years. I also know people who know them and by a pure coincidence had their daughter taken from an apartment in Portugal at the time, from a couple from Leicester by the Police, who thought their daughter was Madeleine. There's too many inconsistencies in their story and if they were not professional people, they would have had their two other children taken of them on their return home, like the Leicester city council wanted them to be.
As for libel laws, they have tried to sue everyone else, without success, one more won't make a difference. Read up on the case, like I have for the past 6 years. I also know people who know them and by a pure coincidence had their daughter taken from an apartment in Portugal at the time, from a couple from Leicester by the Police, who thought their daughter was Madeleine. There's too many inconsistencies in their story and if they were not professional people, they would have had their two other children taken of them on their return home, like the Leicester city council wanted them to be.
yes. but as you said:
horse feathers wrote:
Yep, me too, but he has a bald head now. Also, we all know who really did this dreadful thing, don't we?
i'd contest that you may have suspicions about things, and many of us have had some of those over the last six years....but YOU DON'T KNOW...none of us do
horse feathers wrote:
Yep, me too, but he has a bald head now. Also, we all know who really did this dreadful thing, don't we?
i'd contest that you may have suspicions about things, and many of us have had some of those over the last six years....but YOU DON'T KNOW...none of us do
ANAGRAMER wrote:
Slicklslack clearly has no concept of anguish...
ANAGRAMER wrote:
Slicklslack clearly has no concept of anguish...
What the fuck is that supposed to mean?
splicksplack wrote:
ANAGRAMER wrote:
Slicklslack clearly has no concept of anguish...
What the fuck is that supposed to mean?
Nothing funny about child abduction m8. Nothing.
..and who exactly is finding child abduction funny you dick head?
The humour was in the similarity between the e-fit photo and John Deacon, not the fact that a little girl was snatched.
Adopting the moral high ground by adopting the most tenuous link to an issue is a very questionable practice.
if you don't already, I'd suggest you read the Daily Mail every day. You'll love it.
The humour was in the similarity between the e-fit photo and John Deacon, not the fact that a little girl was snatched.
Adopting the moral high ground by adopting the most tenuous link to an issue is a very questionable practice.
if you don't already, I'd suggest you read the Daily Mail every day. You'll love it.
Who is Madeleine McCann ?