Thanks for sharing. Would've been nice to have something more up-tempo like this on the album, the balance shifts a bit too much to the laid-back ballads IMO.
musicland munich · Member since
Thanks for the link. I am sure the basic idea for this track was good - but the final result has some poor/weak spots.
brians wig · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]musicland munich wrote:[/b]
Thanks for the link. I am sure the basic idea for this track was good - but the final result has some poor/weak spots.[/QUOTE]
Bit like the whole album then....
Vali · Member since
would´ve been nice having this one as the 2nd bonus track in The Lot´s FOE version, instead of (sigh) Murdock ...
Hitman · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]musicland munich wrote:[/b]
Thanks for the link. I am sure the basic idea for this track was good - but the final result has some poor/weak spots.[/QUOTE]
dear friend, negative comments without giving a "personal" list of reasons is a bit pointless, in my opinion. You basically say nothing, but you give a negative idea about something. Not very constructive.
inu-liger · Member since
Agreed ^
blueviolin · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]musicland munich wrote:[/b]
Thanks for the link. I am sure the basic idea for this track was good - but the final result has some poor/weak spots.[/QUOTE]
Agreed ^
princetom · Member since
although it's always good to hear something new from RT, i have to point out that this song is one of the weaker ones. it's quite repetitive and the "plings" twist my nerves. nevertheless there are some quite interesting parts in the middle of that very song which makes it listenable for one or two times. but it's nothing that sticks in your mind for very long, i guess.
i appreciate the gesture to offer something for free and would wish that something like this would happen again (w/ some demo-takes for example...).
btw. another proof that "the lot" isn't the "whole lot" :-)