New Michael Jackson album with umfinished tracks will be released in May. According to the los angeles daily news : "The album will not contain the three unreleased songs Jackson recorded in 1983 with Queen singer Freddie Mercury". So il seems that the tracks will be featured on ANOTHER album (or never!!)... What do you think ?
Heavenite · Member since
Another album I would think! This is a good reason for them to delay the release of the Queen project unfortunately I would think. Another is the loss of another lead actor in the Freddie Mercury album. I reckon we will be waiting another 12 months.
musicland munich · Member since
According to the german radio station I`was listening today - it contains eight new songs from MJ. So the FM/MJ tracks will be released separately( maybe on a Queen Album ) or -n-e-v-e-r- I guess.
bucsateflon · Member since
A Queen album, those track are not Queen songs.Let alone three of them.
Max. one should be there.
Marknow · Member since
Freddie and Michael tracks are slated for release this coming Winter, or Fall if you are American.
Hangman_96 · Member since
The material which belongs to Queen seems to be the only material which is always:
a) delayed;
b) promised to be released next week, next month, next year, in ten years, blah blah blah;
c) unlikely to ever see the light of day.
End of.
brians wig · Member since
Lostman. That is probably the most cynical observation I've witnessed for a long time.
Obviously you are Queen fan of long standing... LOL ;-)
rocknrolllover · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]brians wig wrote:[/b]
Lostman. That is probably the most cynical observation I've witnessed for a long time.
Obviously you are Queen fan of long standing... LOL ;-)[/QUOTE]
This is the most painful truth which i've heard from him. but he is right.
Hangman_96 · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]brians wig wrote:[/b]
Lostman. That is probably the most cynical observation I've witnessed for a long time.
Obviously you are Queen fan of long standing... LOL ;-)[/QUOTE]
Just my point of view. Nothing more.
FreddieCat · Member since
The MJJ Estate lawsuits heaped upon them, particularly the Quincy Jone $10 million and IRS $700 million, might possibly slow QP down a bit. Proceed with caution!!
pestgrid · Member since
Cant have one without the other.....MJ first...x
inu-liger · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]FreddieCat wrote:[/b]
The MJJ Estate lawsuits heaped upon them, particularly the Quincy Jone $10 million and IRS $700 million, might possibly slow QP down a bit. Proceed with caution!![/QUOTE]
You'd think the Estate would jump at the opportunity to earn some extra cash sooner to help fund any potential future settlements in those lawsuits. Jeez.
FreddieCat · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]inu-liger wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]FreddieCat wrote:[/b]
The MJJ Estate lawsuits heaped upon them, particularly the Quincy Jone $10 million and IRS $700 million, might possibly slow QP down a bit. Proceed with caution!![/QUOTE]
You'd think the Estate would jump at the opportunity to earn some extra cash sooner to help fund any potential future settlements in those lawsuits. Jeez.[/QUOTE]
I dunno. $700 mil is alot of cash. Quincy Jones' is chump change compared to that whopping IRS lawsuit.
inu-liger · Member since
That's what I'm saying though. If they're facing a potential $700m loss, they should be funding that NOW.
Heavenite · Member since
Not necessarily. If you don't have it, you can't pay it out. Usually they do some sort of deal, at least that was the way the Tax Office in Australia where I used to work operated. Once the deal is done, I would have thought that the MJ estate could start again, chastened and a bit financially lighter, but ready for new revenues. Having said that, the release of the MJ album in May does seem to suggest it could be used to fund a tax liablity.
