SweetCaroline wrote:
I'm posting this for Black Velvet/icy because she's such a huge Adam Lambert fan:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLnbnwM5764&feature=youtu.be
Hee! Hee!
Black Velvet wrote:taptap wrote:
Black Velvet wrote:taptap wrote:
Black Velvet wrote:(snipping irrelevant cray crap)If you both don't want others to post in this forum, you should add that to the lengthy rules you have set up here.(snipping irrelevant cray crap)
Post a link to this lengthy list of rules please, or else I call bullshit (which will fit in well with the rest of the irrelevant cray crap from your post that I clipped). And remember, it's got to be my list, not the mods.
I'll wait.
Forget it already?...here you go...
http://www.queenzone.com/forums/1379657/trolling-and-fighting-in-the-adam-threads.aspx
Enjoy the scent of bullshit. As your usual though you can't reply to all that is replied to you.
What the hell? How is a post on trolls the same as rules? If you'll look under several other sub-forums you will find at least three threads that contain exactly the same info and thoughts on trolls (at least one by Inu and one by Barb). None of them are rules, not even Barb's, which basically says trolls are stupid, best not to feed them, just like my post did. Neither of which is a rule. Duh. Unless you can c/p specific rules here, I say you're full of shit.
Still waiting (I suspect it will be a loooong wait because duh I never posted a single rule on QZ, much less a lengthy list).
In your trolling thread, you posted if anyone replied to a troll at Barb's and Richards discretion a ban will follow. I've read plenty of this board before deciding to post again. Never have I read Barb or Richard even coming close to posting that, let alone anyone else. So that is one of your bullshit rules that came out of nowhere. So very few posts under your belt, yet you think you know how to run this site. You aren't a mod.
Cray/crazy/being happier...all that from someone who threatened to forward my posts on to a legal commission. That you think someone is here with no proof at all. That I was being blamed for a ban, which I said had nothing to do with me.
Do take note though, I'm not having a go at the ones who will go to shows this summer. I hope everyone from the band itself to the fans have a great time
SweetCaroline wrote:
FreddieCat wrote:
Just listened to the iHeartRadio youtube again. It really was a beautiful performance. At this moment in time I believe QAL is a solid unit. Hopefully they can remain and grow together in music and in spirit throughout the tour. The tour show(s) should be an exciting experience for all fans, old and new.
Nice post! Thanks for getting this thread back on topic! Have you been able to watch the whole show they did in Kiev, Ukraine in 2012? That outdoor square where they performed before 250,000 people was so magnificent and I feel so sad that the same place has been torn apart by the protesters in that country. That night with Elton John performing earlier and then Queen/Adam was magical:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIXaT5vbJOA
I am definitely not an Adam Lambert fan and think some of the videos of his live tours presented by AL fans on this forum are unfit for the human ear. I do however feel that he is a good fit for Queen projects and fans will be delighted by the total QAL product. This should be a successful tour.
taptap wrote:
Black Velvet wrote:taptap wrote:
Black Velvet wrote:taptap wrote:
Black Velvet wrote:(snipping irrelevant cray crap)If you both don't want others to post in this forum, you should add that to the lengthy rules you have set up here.(snipping irrelevant cray crap)
Post a link to this lengthy list of rules please, or else I call bullshit (which will fit in well with the rest of the irrelevant cray crap from your post that I clipped). And remember, it's got to be my list, not the mods.
I'll wait.
Forget it already?...here you go...
http://www.queenzone.com/forums/1379657/trolling-and-fighting-in-the-adam-threads.aspx
Enjoy the scent of bullshit. As your usual though you can't reply to all that is replied to you.
What the hell? How is a post on trolls the same as rules? If you'll look under several other sub-forums you will find at least three threads that contain exactly the same info and thoughts on trolls (at least one by Inu and one by Barb). None of them are rules, not even Barb's, which basically says trolls are stupid, best not to feed them, just like my post did. Neither of which is a rule. Duh. Unless you can c/p specific rules here, I say you're full of shit.
Still waiting (I suspect it will be a loooong wait because duh I never posted a single rule on QZ, much less a lengthy list).
In your trolling thread, you posted if anyone replied to a troll at Barb's and Richards discretion a ban will follow. I've read plenty of this board before deciding to post again. Never have I read Barb or Richard even coming close to posting that, let alone anyone else. So that is one of your bullshit rules that came out of nowhere. So very few posts under your belt, yet you think you know how to run this site. You aren't a mod.
Cray/crazy/being happier...all that from someone who threatened to forward my posts on to a legal commission. That you think someone is here with no proof at all. That I was being blamed for a ban, which I said had nothing to do with me.
Do take note though, I'm not having a go at the ones who will go to shows this summer. I hope everyone from the band itself to the fans have a great time
First of all these words: 'if anyone replied to a troll at Barb's and Richards discretion a ban will follow', make no sense. Second of all, I didn't write them.
Here are the words from my post:
'If you decide to feed the trolls, you risk getting deleted or IP banned at the QZ mods' discretion.'
Anyone with an IQ above 50 knows that 'a ban will follow' (your words) means something completely different from 'you risk getting deleted or IP banned' (my words). and no one with an IQ above 50 could interpret my words as a rule.
Here's another member's post voicing a similar opinion::
QZ should become a better place these days. The "Glambert" fanatics aren`t the only "problem"...weird people(requiring mental treatments),trolls(slap in the face/IP-Ban), advertisings for sports gear in a discussion board( IP-Ban) ! This site is in need of some more serious moderation.
This poster's opinion is that trolls should get a 'slap on the face/IP-Ban', and same goes for sport gear adverts. Is this Member posting a rule? No, it's clearly an opinion.
Okay, so now you've misquoted one sentence from a post of mine that is clearly not a rule, but just an opinion in a members post - like every other opinion in every other member's post. I'm still waiting for the lengthy list of rules you say I've posted. You know, a list that looks something like this:
1. You may not...
2. You may...
You know, actual rules, not your bizarre interpretation of what a rule is.
SweetCaroline wrote:
The first time I saw Adam performing live was at the 2009 American Idol Summer Tour and then I saw him in his solo Glam Nation Tour 3 times in 2010. All I can say about it was that each time his charisma, stage presence and voice was electrifying and mesmerizing. I am anxiously waiting to see if I feel the same way about his live performances with Brian, Roger, Rufus, Spike and Neal in June and July! If I feel this way about Adam I can see what it must have been like for the people who were lucky enough to see the original Queen band performing live with the ultimate charismatic and mesmerizing frontman, Freddie Mercury!
SweetCaroline wrote:
The first time I saw Adam performing live was at the 2009 American Idol Summer Tour and then I saw him in his solo Glam Nation Tour 3 times in 2010. All I can say about it was that each time his charisma, stage presence and voice was electrifying and mesmerizing. I am anxiously waiting to see if I feel the same way about his live performances with Brian, Roger, Rufus, Spike and Neal in June and July! If I feel this way about Adam I can see what it must have been like for the people who were lucky enough to see the original Queen band performing live with the ultimate charismatic and mesmerizing frontman, Freddie Mercury!
Black Velvet wrote:taptap wrote:
Black Velvet wrote:taptap wrote:
Black Velvet wrote:taptap wrote:
Black Velvet wrote:(snipping irrelevant cray crap)If you both don't want others to post in this forum, you should add that to the lengthy rules you have set up here.(snipping irrelevant cray crap)
Post a link to this lengthy list of rules please, or else I call bullshit (which will fit in well with the rest of the irrelevant cray crap from your post that I clipped). And remember, it's got to be my list, not the mods.
I'll wait.
Forget it already?...here you go...
http://www.queenzone.com/forums/1379657/trolling-and-fighting-in-the-adam-threads.aspx
Enjoy the scent of bullshit. As your usual though you can't reply to all that is replied to you.
What the hell? How is a post on trolls the same as rules? If you'll look under several other sub-forums you will find at least three threads that contain exactly the same info and thoughts on trolls (at least one by Inu and one by Barb). None of them are rules, not even Barb's, which basically says trolls are stupid, best not to feed them, just like my post did. Neither of which is a rule. Duh. Unless you can c/p specific rules here, I say you're full of shit.
Still waiting (I suspect it will be a loooong wait because duh I never posted a single rule on QZ, much less a lengthy list).
In your trolling thread, you posted if anyone replied to a troll at Barb's and Richards discretion a ban will follow. I've read plenty of this board before deciding to post again. Never have I read Barb or Richard even coming close to posting that, let alone anyone else. So that is one of your bullshit rules that came out of nowhere. So very few posts under your belt, yet you think you know how to run this site. You aren't a mod.
Cray/crazy/being happier...all that from someone who threatened to forward my posts on to a legal commission. That you think someone is here with no proof at all. That I was being blamed for a ban, which I said had nothing to do with me.
Do take note though, I'm not having a go at the ones who will go to shows this summer. I hope everyone from the band itself to the fans have a great time
First of all these words: 'if anyone replied to a troll at Barb's and Richards discretion a ban will follow', make no sense. Second of all, I didn't write them.
Here are the words from my post:
'If you decide to feed the trolls, you risk getting deleted or IP banned at the QZ mods' discretion.'
Anyone with an IQ above 50 knows that 'a ban will follow' (your words) means something completely different from 'you risk getting deleted or IP banned' (my words). and no one with an IQ above 50 could interpret my words as a rule.
Here's another member's post voicing a similar opinion::
QZ should become a better place these days. The "Glambert" fanatics aren`t the only "problem"...weird people(requiring mental treatments),trolls(slap in the face/IP-Ban), advertisings for sports gear in a discussion board( IP-Ban) ! This site is in need of some more serious moderation.
This poster's opinion is that trolls should get a 'slap on the face/IP-Ban', and same goes for sport gear adverts. Is this Member posting a rule? No, it's clearly an opinion.
Okay, so now you've misquoted one sentence from a post of mine that is clearly not a rule, but just an opinion in a members post - like every other opinion in every other member's post. I'm still waiting for the lengthy list of rules you say I've posted. You know, a list that looks something like this:
1. You may not...
2. You may...
You know, actual rules, not your bizarre interpretation of what a rule is.
Are Glamberts that sensitive that you had to lay all that out in that thread? Or is it just you and sweetcaroline? This here, and threatening legal action on QOL?
You then turn around and say I'm cray/crazy.
You just want total control, and some people booted...and I know full well you won't stop at anything to get it.
SweetCaroline wrote:
Buzz off, Buzzkill! I wasn't talking to you!
taptap wrote:
Black Velvet wrote:taptap wrote:
Black Velvet wrote:taptap wrote:
Black Velvet wrote:taptap wrote:
Black Velvet wrote:(snipping irrelevant cray crap)If you both don't want others to post in this forum, you should add that to the lengthy rules you have set up here.(snipping irrelevant cray crap)
Post a link to this lengthy list of rules please, or else I call bullshit (which will fit in well with the rest of the irrelevant cray crap from your post that I clipped). And remember, it's got to be my list, not the mods.
I'll wait.
Forget it already?...here you go...
http://www.queenzone.com/forums/1379657/trolling-and-fighting-in-the-adam-threads.aspx
Enjoy the scent of bullshit. As your usual though you can't reply to all that is replied to you.
What the hell? How is a post on trolls the same as rules? If you'll look under several other sub-forums you will find at least three threads that contain exactly the same info and thoughts on trolls (at least one by Inu and one by Barb). None of them are rules, not even Barb's, which basically says trolls are stupid, best not to feed them, just like my post did. Neither of which is a rule. Duh. Unless you can c/p specific rules here, I say you're full of shit.
Still waiting (I suspect it will be a loooong wait because duh I never posted a single rule on QZ, much less a lengthy list).
In your trolling thread, you posted if anyone replied to a troll at Barb's and Richards discretion a ban will follow. I've read plenty of this board before deciding to post again. Never have I read Barb or Richard even coming close to posting that, let alone anyone else. So that is one of your bullshit rules that came out of nowhere. So very few posts under your belt, yet you think you know how to run this site. You aren't a mod.
Cray/crazy/being happier...all that from someone who threatened to forward my posts on to a legal commission. That you think someone is here with no proof at all. That I was being blamed for a ban, which I said had nothing to do with me.
Do take note though, I'm not having a go at the ones who will go to shows this summer. I hope everyone from the band itself to the fans have a great time
First of all these words: 'if anyone replied to a troll at Barb's and Richards discretion a ban will follow', make no sense. Second of all, I didn't write them.
Here are the words from my post:
'If you decide to feed the trolls, you risk getting deleted or IP banned at the QZ mods' discretion.'
Anyone with an IQ above 50 knows that 'a ban will follow' (your words) means something completely different from 'you risk getting deleted or IP banned' (my words). and no one with an IQ above 50 could interpret my words as a rule.
Here's another member's post voicing a similar opinion::
QZ should become a better place these days. The "Glambert" fanatics aren`t the only "problem"...weird people(requiring mental treatments),trolls(slap in the face/IP-Ban), advertisings for sports gear in a discussion board( IP-Ban) ! This site is in need of some more serious moderation.
This poster's opinion is that trolls should get a 'slap on the face/IP-Ban', and same goes for sport gear adverts. Is this Member posting a rule? No, it's clearly an opinion.
Okay, so now you've misquoted one sentence from a post of mine that is clearly not a rule, but just an opinion in a members post - like every other opinion in every other member's post. I'm still waiting for the lengthy list of rules you say I've posted. You know, a list that looks something like this:
1. You may not...
2. You may...
You know, actual rules, not your bizarre interpretation of what a rule is.
Are Glamberts that sensitive that you had to lay all that out in that thread? Or is it just you and sweetcaroline? This here, and threatening legal action on QOL?
You then turn around and say I'm cray/crazy.
You just want total control, and some people booted...and I know full well you won't stop at anything to get it.
I laid it all out to show that you're full of shit and willing to lie to make your unfounded accusations. And now that I have, I'm done with you.
SweetCaroline wrote:
Buzz off, Buzzkill! I wasn't talking to you!
FreddieCat wrote:
SweetCaroline wrote:
Buzz off, Buzzkill! I wasn't talking to you!
That wasn't sweet, Caroline.
SweetCaroline wrote:
FreddieCat wrote:
SweetCaroline wrote:
Buzz off, Buzzkill! I wasn't talking to you!
That wasn't sweet, Caroline.
I know! It wasn't meant to be! Good play on words! I'm kind of sick of all the negative stuff! I'm a very positive person and even when things are dark, I try to look at the bright side.